UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Transition Period
From To
|
Commission file number:
000-30421
HANMI FINANCIAL
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-4788120
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
3660 Wilshire Boulevard,
Penthouse Suite ALos Angeles, California
|
|
90010
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(213) 382-2200
(Registrants Telephone
Number, Including Area Code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock, $.001 Par
Value
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Market
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form
10-K or any
amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
Accelerated Filer þ
|
Accelerated
Filer o
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer o
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the
common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was
approximately $793,388,000. For purposes of the foregoing
calculation only, in addition to affiliated companies, all
directors and officers of the Registrant have been deemed
affiliates.
Number of shares of common stock of the Registrant outstanding
as of February 14, 2007 was 49,193,917 shares.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Herein: Registrants Definitive Proxy
Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed within 120 days of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, is incorporated by reference into
Part III of this report.
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff
Comments
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market for
Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial
Data
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Changes In and
Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Other
Information
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Executive
Compensation
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits, Financial
Statement Schedules
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2006
and 2005
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity and
Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
EXHIBIT 10.4 |
EXHIBIT 23 |
EXHIBIT 31.1 |
EXHIBIT 31.2 |
EXHIBIT 32.1 |
EXHIBIT 32.2 |
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Some of the statements under
Item 1. Business,
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
elsewhere in this
Form 10-K
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as may,
will, should, could,
expects, plans, intends,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
potential, or continue, or the negative
of such terms and other comparable terminology. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements. These
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements to differ from those
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statement. For a
discussion of some of the factors that might cause such a
difference, see Item 1A. Risk Factors,
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Interest Rate Risk Management and
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after
the date on which such statements were made, except as required
by law.
PART I
General
Hanmi Financial Corporation (Hanmi Financial,
we or us) is a Delaware corporation
incorporated on March 14, 2000 pursuant to a Plan of
Reorganization and Agreement of Merger to be the holding company
for Hanmi Bank (the Bank). Hanmi Financial became
the holding company for the Bank in June 2000 and is subject to
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
(BHCA). Hanmi Financial also elected financial
holding company status under the BHCA in 2000. Our principal
office is located at 3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse
Suite A, Los Angeles, California 90010, and our telephone
number is
(213) 382-2200.
Hanmi Bank, our primary subsidiary, was incorporated under the
laws of the State of California on August 24, 1981 and was
licensed by the California Department of Financial Institutions
(DFI) on December 15, 1982. The Banks
deposit accounts are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance
Act (FDI Act) up to applicable limits thereof, and
the Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System. The
Banks headquarters is located at 3660 Wilshire Boulevard,
Penthouse Suite A, Los Angeles, California 90010.
Hanmi Bank is a community bank conducting general business
banking, with its primary market encompassing the
Korean-American
community as well as other communities in the multi-ethnic
population of Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego,
San Francisco and Santa Clara counties. The
Banks full-service offices are located in business areas
where many of the businesses are run by immigrants and other
minority groups. The Banks client base reflects the
multi-ethnic composition of these communities. At
December 31, 2006, the Bank had 22 full-service branch
offices in California and nine loan production offices in
California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Texas, Virginia and
Washington.
Our revenues are derived primarily from interest on our loan and
securities portfolios and service charges on deposit accounts. A
summary of revenues for the periods indicated follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest and Fees on Loans
|
|
$
|
239,075
|
|
|
|
80.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
180,845
|
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,999
|
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
Interest on Investments
|
|
|
19,710
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
18,507
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
17,372
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
Other Interest Income
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
|
|
17,134
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
15,782
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
14,441
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
Other Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
18,470
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
11,770
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
295,793
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
231,323
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
161,765
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Business
Acquisitions
In 2004, Hanmi Financial completed the acquisition of Pacific
Union Bank (PUB), Los Angeles, California, and PUB
was merged with Hanmi Bank.
Effective January 3, 2007, Hanmi Financial acquired two
full-service insurance agencies, Chun-Ha Insurance Services,
Inc. (Chun-Ha) and All World Insurance Services,
Inc. (AWI), Garden Grove, California, as
wholly-owned subsidiaries. The acquisition is not expected to
have a significant effect on our financial position or results
of operations.
Market
Area
Hanmi Bank historically has provided its banking services
through its branch network, located primarily in the Koreatown
area of Los Angeles, to a wide variety of small- to medium-sized
businesses. In recent years, it has expanded its service areas
through de novo branching to Orange County, Santa Clara and
San Diego and through acquisition to San Francisco and
Seattle. Throughout the Banks service area, competition is
intense for both loans and deposits. While the market for
banking services is dominated by a few nationwide banks with
many offices operating over a wide geographic area, savings
banks, thrift and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage
companies, insurance companies and other lending institutions,
the Banks primary competitors are relatively smaller
community banks that focus their marketing efforts on
Korean-American
businesses in the Banks service areas. Substantially all
of our assets are located in, and substantially all of our
revenues are derived from clients located within, the State of
California.
In 2005 and 2006, the Bank opened loan production offices in
Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver and Annandale. These offices
will expand our geographic coverage by providing commercial and
industrial, real estate and Small Business Administration
(SBA) loans. The Bank also has loan production
offices in Los Angeles, California; the San Jose,
California metropolitan area; and the Seattle, Washington
metropolitan area. We plan to continue to expand our business
services by opening additional loan production offices in
selected locations throughout the United States. The Bank is a
preferred SBA lender in the following SBA districts: California
(Los Angeles, Santa Ana, San Diego, Fresno,
San Francisco and Sacramento), Portland, Seattle,
Anchorage, Denver, Texas (Dallas and Houston), Illinois,
Georgia, Florida, Virginia, Washington, D.C., Maryland, New
Jersey and New York.
Lending
Activities
Hanmi Bank originates loans for its own portfolio and for sale
in the secondary market. Lending activities include commercial
loans, SBA guaranteed loans, loans secured by real estate
(commercial mortgage loans, real estate construction loans and
residential mortgage loans) and consumer loans.
Commercial
Loans
Hanmi Bank offers commercial loans for intermediate and
short-term credit. Commercial loans may be unsecured, partially
secured or fully secured. The majority of the origination of
commercial loans is in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, and loan
maturities are normally 12 to 60 months. Hanmi Bank
requires a credit underwriting before considering any extension
of credit. The Bank finances primarily small and middle market
businesses in a wide spectrum of industries. Commercial and
industrial loans consist of credit lines for operating needs,
loans for equipment purchases and working capital, and various
other business purposes. As compared to consumer lending,
commercial lending entails significant additional risks. These
loans typically involve larger loan balances, are generally
dependent on the businesss cash flow and may be subject to
adverse conditions in the general economy or in a specific
industry. Short-term business loans generally are intended to
finance current operations and typically provide for periodic
principal payments, with interest payable monthly. Term loans
normally provide for floating interest rates, with monthly
payments of both principal and interest.
In general, it is the intent of Hanmi Bank to take collateral
whenever possible, regardless of the loan purpose(s). Collateral
may include liens on inventory, accounts receivable, fixtures
and equipment, leasehold improvements and real estate. When real
estate is the primary collateral, the Bank obtains formal
appraisals in
2
accordance with applicable regulations to support the value of
the real estate collateral. Typically, Hanmi Bank requires all
principals of a business to be co-obligors on all loan
instruments and all significant stockholders of corporations to
execute a specific debt guaranty. All borrowers must demonstrate
the ability to service and repay not only their obligations to
Hanmi Bank debt, but also all outstanding business debt, without
liquidating the collateral, based on historical earnings or
reliable projections.
SBA
Guaranteed Loans
Hanmi Bank originates loans qualifying for guarantees issued by
the United States SBA, an independent agency of the Federal
government. The SBA guarantees on such loans currently range
from 75 percent to 85 percent of the principal and
accrued interest. Under certain circumstances, the guarantee of
principal and interest may be less than 75 percent. In
general, the guaranteed percentage is less than 75 percent
for loans over $1.3 million. Hanmi Bank typically requires
that SBA loans be secured by business assets and by a first or
second deed of trust on any available real property. When the
loan is secured by a first deed of trust on real property, the
Bank obtains appraisals in accordance with applicable
regulations. SBA loans have terms ranging from five to twenty
years depending on the use of the proceeds. To qualify for a SBA
loan, a borrower must demonstrate the capacity to service and
repay the loan, without liquidating the collateral, on the basis
of historical earnings or reliable projections.
Hanmi Bank generally sells to unrelated third parties a
substantial amount of the guaranteed portion of the SBA
guaranteed loans that it originates. During the fourth quarter
of 2006, the Bank began selling the unguaranteed portion of SBA
loans. When Hanmi Bank sells a SBA loan, it may be obligated to
repurchase the loan (for a period of 90 days after the
sale) if the loan fails to comply with certain representations
and warranties given by the Bank. The Bank is also obligated to
repurchase the loan (before 120 days past due) if the loan
is past due. Hanmi Bank retains the obligation to service the
SBA loans, for which it receives servicing fees. The unsold
portions of the SBA loans that remain owned by Hanmi Bank are
included in Loans Receivable on the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition. As of December 31, 2006, Hanmi Bank
had $171.6 million in SBA loans in its portfolio, and was
servicing $236.0 million of SBA loans sold to investors.
Loans
Secured by Real Estate
Real estate lending involves risks associated with the potential
decline in the value of the underlying real estate collateral
and the cash flow from income-producing properties. Declines in
real estate values and cash flows can be caused by a number of
factors, including adversity in general economic conditions,
rising interest rates, changes in tax and other laws and
regulations affecting the holding of real estate, environmental
conditions, governmental and other use restrictions, development
of competitive properties and increasing vacancy rates. When
real estate values decline, Hanmi Banks real estate
dependence increases the risk of loss both in Hanmi Banks
loan portfolio and any holdings of other real estate owned as a
result of foreclosures on loans.
Commercial
Mortgage Loans
Hanmi Bank offers commercial real estate loans. These loans are
generally collateralized by first deeds of trust. For these
commercial mortgage loans, the Bank obtains formal appraisals in
accordance with applicable regulations to support the value of
the real estate collateral. All appraisal reports on commercial
mortgage loans are reviewed by an appraisal review officer. The
review generally covers an examination of the appraisers
assumptions and methods that were used to derive a value for the
property, as well as compliance with the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice (the USPAP). Hanmi
Bank also considers the cash flow from the business. The
majority of the properties securing these loans are located in
Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
Hanmi Banks commercial real estate loans are principally
secured by investor-owned commercial buildings and
owner-occupied commercial and industrial buildings. Generally,
these types of loans are made for a period of up to seven years,
with monthly payments based upon a portion of the principal plus
accrued interest, and with a
loan-to-value
ratio of 65 percent or less, using an adjustable rate
indexed to the prime rate appearing in the West Coast edition of
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ Prime Rate) or
Hanmi Banks prime rate (Bank Prime Rate), as
adjusted from time to time. Hanmi Bank also offers fixed-rate
commercial real estate loans, including hybrid-fixed
3
rate loans that are fixed for one to five years and convert to
adjustable rate loans for the remaining term. Amortization
schedules for commercial real estate loans generally do not
exceed 25 years.
Payments on loans secured by investor-owned and owner-occupied
properties are often dependent upon successful operation or
management of the properties. Repayment of such loans may be
subject to a greater extent to the risk of adverse conditions in
the real estate market or the economy. The Bank seeks to
minimize these risks in a variety of ways, including limiting
the size of such loans and strictly scrutinizing the property
securing the loan. The Bank seeks to manage these risks in a
variety of ways, including vacancy and interest rate hike
sensitivity analysis at the time of loan origination and
quarterly risk assessment of the total commercial real estate
secured loan portfolio that includes most recent industry
trends. When possible, the Bank also obtains corporate or
individual guarantees from financially capable parties.
Representatives of the Bank visit all of the properties securing
the Banks real estate loans before the loans are approved.
The Bank requires title insurance insuring the status of its
lien on all of the real estate secured loans when a first or
second trust deed on the real estate is taken as collateral. The
Bank also requires the borrower to maintain fire insurance,
extended coverage casualty insurance and, if the property is in
a flood zone, flood insurance, in an amount equal to the
outstanding loan balance, subject to applicable laws that may
limit the amount of hazard insurance a lender can require to
replace such improvements. We cannot assure that these
procedures will protect against losses on loans secured by real
property.
Real Estate
Construction Loans
Hanmi Bank finances the construction of multifamily, low-income
housing, commercial and industrial properties within its market
area. The future condition of the local economy could negatively
affect the collateral values of such loans. The Banks
construction loans typically have the following characteristics:
|
|
|
|
|
maturities of two years or less;
|
|
|
|
a floating rate of interest based on the Bank Prime Rate or a
nationally recognized index such as the WSJ Prime Rate;
|
|
|
|
minimum cash equity of 35 percent of project cost;
|
|
|
|
reserve of anticipated interest costs during construction or
advance of fees;
|
|
|
|
first lien position on the underlying real estate;
|
|
|
|
loan-to-value
ratios generally not exceeding 65 percent; and
|
|
|
|
recourse against the borrower or a guarantor in the event of
default.
|
Hanmi Bank does, on a
case-by-case
basis, commit to making permanent loans on the property with
loan conditions that command strong project stability and debt
service coverage. Construction loans involve additional risks
compared to loans secured by existing improved real property.
These include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the uncertain value of the project prior to completion;
|
|
|
|
the inherent uncertainty in estimating construction costs, which
are often beyond the borrowers control;
|
|
|
|
construction delays and cost overruns;
|
|
|
|
possible difficulties encountered in connection with municipal
or other governmental regulations during construction; and
|
|
|
|
the difficulty in accurately evaluating the market value of the
completed project.
|
As a result of these uncertainties, construction lending often
involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment
dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project
rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay
principal and interest. If Hanmi Bank is forced to foreclose on
a project prior to or at completion due to a default, there can
be no assurance that Hanmi Bank will be able to recover all of
the unpaid balance of, or accrued interest on, the loans as well
as the related foreclosure and holding costs. In addition, Hanmi
Bank may be required to fund additional amounts to complete a
project and may have to hold the property for an indeterminable
period of time. Hanmi Bank has underwriting procedures designed
to identify what it believes to be acceptable
4
levels of risk in construction lending. Among other things,
qualified and bonded third parties are engaged to provide
progress reports and recommendations for construction
disbursements. No assurance can be given that these procedures
will prevent losses arising from the risks described above.
Residential
Mortgage Loans
Hanmi Bank originates fixed-rate and variable-rate mortgage
loans secured by one- to four-family properties with
amortization schedules of 15 to 30 years and maturities of
up to 30 years. The loan fees charged, interest rates and
other provisions of the Banks residential loans are
determined by an analysis of the Banks cost of funds, cost
of origination, cost of servicing, risk factors and portfolio
needs. The Bank may sell some of the mortgage loans that it
originates to secondary market participants. The typical
turn-around time from origination to sale is between 30 and
90 days. The interest rate and the price of the loan are
typically agreed to prior to the loan origination.
Consumer
Loans
Consumer loans are extended for a variety of purposes. Most are
for the purchase of automobiles. Other consumer loans include
secured and unsecured personal loans, home improvement loans,
home equity lines of credit (HELOCs),
overdraft protection loans, unsecured lines of credit and credit
cards. Management assesses the borrowers creditworthiness
and ability to repay the debt through a review of credit history
and ratings, verification of employment and other income, review
of
debt-to-income
ratios and other measures of repayment ability. Although
creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary importance, the
underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of
the collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount. Most of
Hanmi Banks loans to individuals are repayable on an
installment basis.
Any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not
provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan
balance, because the collateral is more likely to suffer damage,
loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not
warrant further collection efforts against the borrower beyond
obtaining a deficiency judgment. In addition, the collection of
loans to individuals is dependent on the borrowers
continuing financial stability, and thus is more likely to be
adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal
bankruptcy. Furthermore, various Federal and state laws,
including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, often limit the amount
that the lender can recover on loans to individuals. Loans to
individuals may also give rise to claims and defenses by a
consumer borrower against the lender on these loans, and a
borrower may be able to assert against any assignee of the note
these claims and defenses that the borrower has against the
seller of the underlying collateral.
Off-Balance
Sheet Commitments
As part of its service to its small- to medium-sized business
customers, Hanmi Bank from time to time issues formal
commitments and lines of credit. These commitments can be either
secured or unsecured. They may be in the form of revolving lines
of credit for seasonal working capital needs or may take the
form of commercial letters of credit or standby letters of
credit. Commercial letters of credit facilitate import trade.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
Hanmi Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third
party.
Lending
Procedures and Loan Limits
Loan applications may be approved by the Board of
Directors Loan Committee, or by Hanmi Banks
management or lending officers to the extent of their lending
authority. Individual lending authority is granted to the Chief
Credit Officer, the Deputy Chief Credit Officer and the Senior
Credit Officer. In early 2006, the Bank granted lending
authority to certain additional officers including Branch
Managers and the line managers to whom they report. Loans for
which direct and indirect borrower liability exceeds an
individuals lending authority are referred to Hanmi
Banks Management Credit Committee and, for those in excess
of the Management Credit Committees approval limits, to
the Board of Directors Loan Committee.
At December 31, 2006, Hanmi Banks authorized legal
lending limits for loans to one borrower were $56.5 million
for unsecured loans plus an additional $37.6 million for
specific secured loans. Legal lending limits are calculated in
conformance with California law, which prohibits a bank from
lending to any one individual or entity or its related interests
an aggregate amount that exceeds 15 percent of primary
capital plus the allowance for
5
loan losses on an unsecured basis, plus an additional
10 percent on a secured basis. Hanmi Banks primary
capital plus allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2006
totaled $376.4 million.
Hanmi Bank seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan
portfolio by adhering to certain underwriting practices. The
review of each loan application includes analysis of the
applicants experience, prior credit history, income level,
cash flow, financial condition, tax returns, cash flow
projections, and the value of any collateral to secure the loan,
based upon reports of independent appraisers
and/or
audits of accounts receivable or inventory pledged as security.
In the case of real estate loans over a specified amount, the
review of collateral value includes an appraisal report prepared
by an independent Bank-approved appraiser. All appraisal reports
on commercial real property secured loans are reviewed by an
Appraisal Review Officer. The review generally covers an
examination of the appraisers assumptions and methods that
were used to derive a value for the property, as well as
compliance with the USPAP.
Allowance
for Loan Losses, Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items and
Provision for Credit Losses
Hanmi Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level
considered by management to be adequate to cover the inherent
risks of loss associated with its loan portfolio under
prevailing economic conditions. In addition, the Bank maintains
an allowance for off-balance sheet items associated with
unfunded commitments and letters of credit, which is included in
Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition.
Hanmi Bank follows the Interagency Policy Statement on
the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and analyzes
the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. In addition,
as an integral part of the quarterly credit review process of
the Bank, the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
off-balance sheet items are reviewed for adequacy. The DFI
and/or the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
FRB) require the Bank to recognize additions to the
allowance for loan losses based upon their assessment of the
information available to them at the time of their examinations.
Deposits
We raise funds primarily through Hanmi Banks network of
branches. The Bank attracts deposits by offering a wide variety
of transaction and term accounts and personalized customer
service. Accounts offered include business and personal checking
accounts, savings accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal
(NOW) accounts, money market accounts and
certificates of deposit.
Website
We maintain an Internet website at www.hanmi.com. We make
available free of charge on the website our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable
after we file such reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC or the Commission). None
of the information on or hyperlinked from our website is
incorporated into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, we had 589 full-time
equivalent employees. Our employees are not represented by a
union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
Insurance
We maintain financial institution bond and commercial insurance
at levels deemed adequate by management to protect Hanmi
Financial from certain damages.
Competition
The banking and financial services industry in California
generally, and in Hanmi Banks market areas specifically,
are highly competitive. The increasingly competitive environment
faced by banks is a result primarily of changes in laws and
regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems,
new competitors in the
6
market, and the accelerating pace of consolidation among
financial service providers. We compete for loans, deposits and
customers with other commercial banks, savings institutions,
securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, real
estate investment trusts, insurance companies, finance
companies, money market funds, credit unions and other non-bank
financial service providers. Some of these competitors are
larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access
to capital markets, including foreign-ownership,
and/or offer
a broader range of financial services.
Among the advantages that the major banks have over Hanmi Bank
is their ability to finance extensive advertising campaigns and
to allocate their investment assets to regions of highest yield
and demand. Many of the major commercial banks operating in
Hanmi Banks service areas offer specific services (for
instance, trust services) that are not offered directly by Hanmi
Bank. By virtue of their greater total capitalization, these
banks also have substantially higher lending limits than Hanmi
Bank does.
The recent trend has been for other institutions, including
brokerage firms, credit card companies and retail
establishments, to offer banking services to consumers,
including money market funds with check access and cash advances
on credit card accounts. In addition, other entities (both
public and private) seeking to raise capital through the
issuance and sale of debt or equity securities compete with
banks in the acquisition of deposits.
Hanmi Banks major competitors are relatively smaller
community banks that focus their marketing efforts on
Korean-American
businesses in Hanmi Banks service areas. Amongst these
banks, Hanmi Bank is the largest, with a loan portfolio that is
67.3 percent larger than its nearest competitors loan
portfolio, and a deposit portfolio that is 68.1 percent
larger than its nearest competitors deposit portfolio.
These banks compete for loans primarily through the interest
rates and fees they charge and the convenience and quality of
service they provide to borrowers. The principal bases of
competition for deposits are the interest rate paid, convenience
and service.
In order to compete with other financial institutions in its
service area, Hanmi Bank relies principally upon local
promotional activity, including advertising in the local media,
personal contacts, direct mail and specialized services. The
Banks promotional activities emphasize the advantages of
dealing with a locally owned and headquartered institution
attuned to the particular needs of the community.
Economic
Conditions, Government Policies, Legislation and
Regulation
Our profitability, like that of most financial institutions, is
primarily dependent on interest rate differentials. In general,
the difference between the interest rates paid by us on
interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other
borrowings, and the interest rates received by us on our
interest-earning assets, such as loans extended to our customers
and securities held in our investment portfolio, will comprise
the major portion of our earnings. These rates are highly
sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, such as
inflation, recession and unemployment, and the impact that
future changes in domestic and foreign economic conditions might
have on us cannot be predicted.
Our business is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal
policies of the federal government and the policies of
regulatory agencies, particularly the FRB. The FRB implements
national monetary policies (with objectives such as curbing
inflation and combating recession) through its open-market
operations in U.S. Government securities, by adjusting the
required level of reserves for depository institutions subject
to its reserve requirements, and by varying the target federal
funds and discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository
institutions. The actions of the FRB in these areas influence
the growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and also
affect interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The nature and impact on
us of any future changes in monetary and fiscal policies cannot
be predicted.
From time to time, federal and state legislation is enacted
which may have the effect of materially increasing the cost of
doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or
affecting the competitive balance between banks and other
financial services providers, such as recent federal legislation
permitting affiliations among commercial banks, insurance
companies and securities firms. We cannot predict whether or
when any potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted,
the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have
on our financial condition or results of operations. In
addition, the outcome of any investigations initiated by state
authorities or litigation raising issues may result in necessary
changes in our operations, additional regulation and increased
compliance costs.
7
Supervision
and Regulation
General
We are extensively regulated under both Federal and certain
state laws. Regulation and supervision by the federal and state
banking agencies is intended primarily for the protection of
depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF)
administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC), and not for the benefit of stockholders. Set
forth below is a summary description of the key laws and
regulations that relate to our operations. These descriptions
are qualified in their entirety by reference to the applicable
laws and regulations.
Hanmi
Financial
As a financial holding company, we are subject to regulation and
examination by the FRB under the BHCA. We are required to file
with the FRB periodic reports and such additional information as
the FRB may require.
The FRB may require us to terminate an activity or terminate
control of, liquidate or divest certain subsidiaries, affiliates
or investments if the FRB believes the activity or the control
of the subsidiary or affiliate constitutes a significant risk to
the financial safety, soundness or stability of our banking
subsidiary. The FRB also has the authority to regulate
provisions of certain bank holding company debt, including the
authority to impose interest ceilings and reserve requirements
on such debt. Under certain circumstances, we must file written
notice and obtain FRB approval prior to purchasing or redeeming
our equity securities. Further, we are required by the FRB to
maintain certain levels of capital. See Capital
Standards.
We are required to obtain prior FRB approval for the acquisition
of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of any class
of voting securities or substantially all of the assets of any
bank or bank holding company. Prior FRB approval is also
required for the merger or consolidation of a bank holding
company with another bank holding company. Similar state banking
agency approvals may also be required. Certain competitive,
management, financial and other factors are considered by the
bank regulatory agencies in granting these approvals.
We are prohibited by the BHCA, except in certain statutorily
prescribed instances, from acquiring direct or indirect
ownership or control of more than five percent of the
outstanding voting shares of any company that is not a bank or
bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in
activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling
banks, or furnishing services to subsidiaries. However, subject
to prior notice or FRB approval, we may engage in any, or
acquire shares of companies engaged in, those non-banking
activities that the FRB deems to be so closely related to
banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper
incident thereto. We may make acquisitions and engage in these
non-banking and certain other activities without prior FRB
approval pursuant to our election as a financial holding company.
FRB regulations require that each bank holding company serve as
a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary
bank(s) and commit resources as necessary to support each
subsidiary bank. A bank holding companys failure to meet
its obligations to serve as a source of strength to its
subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the FRB to be
an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of FRB
regulations or both. The FRBs bank holding company rating
system emphasizes risk management and evaluation of the
potential impact of non-depository entities on safety and
soundness.
We are also a bank holding company within the meaning of the
California Financial Code. As such, Hanmi Financial and our
subsidiary are subject to examination by, and may be required to
file reports with, the DFI.
Financial
Holding Status
In order to elect or retain financial holding company status,
our depository institution subsidiary must be well-capitalized,
well-managed, and, except in limited circumstances, in
satisfactory compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act
(CRA). Failure to sustain compliance with these
requirements or correct any non-compliance within a fixed time
period could lead to divestiture of subsidiary banks or require
us to conform all of our activities to those permissible for a
bank holding company. We elected financial holding company
status in 2000.
As a bank holding company that has elected to be a financial
holding company, we may affiliate with securities firms and
insurance companies and engage in other activities, without
prior FRB notice or approval, that are
8
determined to be financial in nature or are incidental or
complementary to activities that are financial in nature.
Financial in nature activities include:
|
|
|
|
|
lending, exchanging, transferring, investing for others, or
safeguarding financial assets other than money or securities;
|
|
|
|
providing any device or other instrumentality for transferring
money or other financial assets;
|
|
|
|
arranging, effecting or facilitating financial transactions for
the account of third parties;
|
|
|
|
securities underwriting;
|
|
|
|
dealing and market making;
|
|
|
|
sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies;
|
|
|
|
insurance underwriting and agency sales;
|
|
|
|
merchant banking investments; and
|
|
|
|
activities that the FRB, in consultation with the Secretary of
the Treasury, determines from time to time to be so closely
related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a
proper incident thereto.
|
The
Bank
As a California chartered bank that is a member of the Federal
Reserve, we are subject to primary supervision, periodic
examination and regulation by the DFI and the FRB through the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, as well as certain
regulations promulgated by the FDIC. If, as a result of an
examination of the Bank, the FRB or DFI determines that the
financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings
prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of our
banking operations are unsatisfactory or that the Bank is
violating or has violated any law or regulation, various
remedies are available to the FRB, including the power to
require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting
from any violation or practice; enter into informal non-public
or formal public memoranda of understanding or written
agreements with the Bank to take corrective action; issue an
administrative order that can be judicially enforced; enjoin
unsafe or unsound practices; direct an increase in
capital; restrict our growth; assess civil monetary penalties;
and remove officers and directors. Ultimately, the DFI could
take possession and close and liquidate the Bank.
The DFI also possesses broad powers to take corrective and other
supervisory actions to resolve the problems of California
state-chartered banks. These enforcement powers include cease
and desist orders, the imposition of fines, the ability to take
possession of a bank and the ability to close and liquidate a
bank.
Changes, such as the following, in Federal or state banking laws
or the regulations, policies or guidance of the Federal or state
banking agencies could have a material adverse impact on us, the
Bank and our operations:
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2006, the Federal banking agencies issued final
guidance to reinforce sound risk management practices for bank
holding companies and banks in commercial real estate
(CRE) loans which establishes CRE concentration
thresholds as criteria for examiners to identify CRE
concentration that may warrant further analysis. The
implementation of these guidelines could result in increased
reserves and capital costs for banks with CRE
concentration. As of December 31, 2006, the
Banks CRE portfolio would not meet the definition of CRE
concentration as set forth in the guidelines.
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the Federal banking agencies issued final
guidance on alternative residential mortgage products that allow
borrowers to defer repayment of principal and sometimes
interest, including interest-only mortgage loans,
and payment option adjustable rate mortgages where a
borrower has flexible payment options, including payments that
have the potential for negative amortization. While
acknowledging that innovations in mortgage lending can benefit
some consumers, the final guidance states that management should
(1) assess a borrowers ability to repay the loan,
including any principal balances added through negative
amortization, at the fully indexed rate that would apply after
the introductory period, (2) recognize that certain
nontraditional mortgages are untested in a stressed environment
and warrant strong risk management standards as well as
appropriate capital and loan loss reserves, and (3) ensure
that
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
borrowers have sufficient information to clearly understand loan
terms and associated risks prior to making a product or payment
choice. The Bank believes its products and disclosures are in
conformance with the requirements of the guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of
2006, the SEC and the FRB have released, as Regulation R,
joint proposed rules expected to be finalized by midyear to
implement exceptions provided for in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
for bank securities activities which banks may conduct without
registering with the SEC as securities brokers or moving such
activities to a broker-dealer affiliate. The proposed
Regulation R push out rules exceptions would
allow a bank, subject to certain conditions, to continue to
conduct securities transactions for customers as part of the
banks trust and fiduciary, custodial and deposit
sweep functions, and to refer customers to a
securities broker-dealer pursuant to a networking arrangement
with the broker-dealer. The proposed rules, if adopted, are not
expected to have a material effect on the current securities
activities which the Bank now conducts for customers.
|
Because California permits commercial banks chartered by the
state to engage in any activity permissible for national banks,
the Bank may form subsidiaries to engage in the many so-called
closely related to banking or
non-banking activities commonly conducted by
national banks in operating subsidiaries, and may conduct
certain financial activities in a subsidiary to the
same extent as may a national bank. However, in order to form a
financial subsidiary, the Bank must be
well-capitalized, well-managed and in
satisfactory compliance with the CRA. Further, the Bank must
exclude from its assets and equity all equity investments,
including retained earnings, in a financial subsidiary. The
assets of the subsidiary may not be consolidated with the
Banks assets. The Bank must also have policies and
procedures to assess financial subsidiary risk and protect the
Bank from such risks and potential liabilities and would be
subject to the same capital deduction, risk management and
affiliate transaction rules as applicable to national banks.
Generally, a financial subsidiary is permitted to engage in
activities that are financial in nature or
incidental thereto, even though they are not permissible for the
national bank to conduct directly within the Bank. The
definition of financial in nature includes, among
other items, underwriting, dealing in or making a market in
securities, including, for example, distributing shares of
mutual funds. The subsidiary may not, however, under present
law, engage as principal in underwriting insurance (other than
credit life insurance), issue annuities or engage in real estate
brokerage or in merchant banking activities. Chun-Ha and AWI are
financial subsidiaries of Hanmi Financial.
Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) System
The Bank is a member of the FHLB of San Francisco. Among
other benefits, each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank
for its members within its assigned region. Each FHLB is
financed primarily from the sale of consolidated obligations of
the FHLB system. Each FHLB makes available loans or advances to
its members in compliance with the policies and procedures
established by the Board of Directors of the individual FHLB. As
a FHLB member, we are required to own a certain amount of
capital stock in the FHLB. At December 31, 2006, we were in
compliance with the stock requirements.
Interstate
Banking and Branching
Subject to certain size limitations under the Riegle-Neal
Interstate Banking Act, bank holding companies and banks have
the ability to acquire and merge with banks in other states;
and, subject to certain state restrictions, banks may also
acquire or establish new branches outside their home states.
Interstate branches are subject to certain laws of the states in
which they are located. Competition may increase further as
banks branch across state lines and enter new markets.
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addressed accounting oversight
and corporate governance matters, and, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
required executive certification of financial presentations;
|
|
|
|
increased requirements for board audit committees and their
members;
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
enhanced disclosure of controls and procedures and internal
control over financial reporting;
|
|
|
|
enhanced controls on, and reporting of, insider trading; and
|
|
|
|
increased penalties for financial crimes and forfeiture of
executive bonuses in certain circumstances.
|
The legislation and its implementing regulations have resulted
in increased costs of compliance, including certain outside
professional costs. To date, these costs have not had a material
impact on our operations.
Dividends
and Other Transfers of Funds
Dividends from the Bank constitute the principal source of
income to Hanmi Financial, which is a legal entity separate and
distinct from the Bank. A FRB policy statement on the payment of
cash dividends states that a bank holding company should pay
cash dividends only to the extent that the holding
companys net income for the past year is sufficient to
cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention
that is consistent with the holding companys capital
needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB
also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a company
experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay
dividends. Furthermore, under the Federal prompt corrective
action regulations, the FRB may prohibit a bank holding company
from paying any dividends if the holding companys bank
subsidiary is classified as undercapitalized. See
Capital Standards below.
The Bank is subject to various statutory and regulatory
restrictions on its ability to pay dividends. Under such
restrictions, the amount available for payment of dividends to
Hanmi Financial by the Bank totaled $131.0 million at
December 31, 2006. In addition, the Banks regulators
have the authority to prohibit the Bank from paying dividends,
depending upon the Banks financial condition, if such
payment is deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
Capital
Standards
The Federal banking agencies have adopted risk-based minimum
capital guidelines for bank holding companies and banks that are
intended to provide a measure of capital that reflects the
degree of risk associated with a banking organizations
operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet
as assets and transactions which are recorded as off balance
sheet items. Under these guidelines, nominal dollar amounts of
assets and credit equivalent amounts of off balance sheet items
are multiplied by one of several risk adjustment percentages,
which range from zero percent for assets with low credit risk,
such as certain U.S. Treasury securities, to
100 percent for assets with relatively high credit risk,
such as business loans.
Under the capital guidelines, a banking organizations
total capital is divided into tiers. Tier I
capital consists of (1) common equity,
(2) qualifying non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
(3) a limited amount of qualifying cumulative perpetual
preferred stock and (4) minority interests in the equity
accounts of consolidated subsidiaries (including trust-preferred
securities), less goodwill and certain other intangible assets.
Qualifying Tier I capital may consist of trust-preferred
securities, subject to the FRBs final rule adopted
March 4, 2005, which changed the criteria and quantitative
limits for inclusion of restricted core capital elements in
Tier I capital. Tier II capital consists
of hybrid capital instruments, perpetual debt, mandatory
convertible debt securities, a limited amount of subordinated
debt, preferred stock and trust-preferred securities that do not
qualify as Tier I capital, a limited amount of the
allowance for loan and lease losses and a limited amount of
unrealized holding gains on equity securities.
Tier III capital consists of qualifying
unsecured subordinated debt. The sum of Tier II and
Tier III capital may not exceed the amount of Tier I
capital.
The risk-based capital guidelines require a minimum ratio of
qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted assets of
8.0 percent and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to
risk-adjusted assets of 4.0 percent. In addition to the
risk-based guidelines, Federal banking regulators require
banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of
Tier 1 capital to total assets, referred to as the leverage
ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the
five categories used by regulators to rate banking
organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital
to total assets must be 3.0 percent.
11
As of December 31, 2006, the regulatory capital guidelines
and the actual capital ratios for Hanmi Financial and the Bank
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual as of
|
|
|
|
Requirement
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Adequately
|
|
|
Well
|
|
|
Hanmi
|
|
|
Hanmi
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.28
|
%
|
|
|
12.55
|
%
|
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital
Ratio
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.31
|
%
|
|
|
11.58
|
%
|
Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.85
|
%
|
|
|
10.08
|
%
|
The current risk-based capital guidelines are based upon the
1988 capital accord of the International Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision. A new international accord, referred to as
Basel II, which emphasizes internal assessment of credit,
market and operational risk, supervisory assessment and market
discipline in determining minimum capital requirements,
currently becomes mandatory outside the U.S. in 2008. In
October 2006, the U.S. federal banking agencies issued a
notice of proposed rulemaking for comment to implement
Basel II for U.S. banks with certain differences from
the international Basel II framework and which would not be
fully in effect for U.S. banks until 2012. Further, the
U.S. banking agencies propose to retain the minimum
leverage requirement and prompt corrective action regulatory
standards. In December 2006, the federal banking agencies issued
another notice of proposed rulemaking for comment, referred to
as Basel IA, which proposed alternative capital requirements for
smaller U.S. banks that may be negatively impacted
competitively by certain provisions of Basel II. Additional
guidance on Basel II issued in February 2007 stated
the agencies expectation that to determine the extent to
which banks should hold capital in excess of regulatory minimum
levels, examiners would examine the combined implications of a
banks compliance with qualification requirements for
regulatory risk-based capital standards, the quality and results
of the banks internal capital adequacy assessment process,
and the examiners assessment of the banks risk
profile and capital position. At this time, the impact that
proposed changes in capital requirements may have on the cost
and availability of different types of credit and the compliance
cost of implementing Basel II or Basel IA, as applicable,
are uncertain.
The federal banking agencies possess broad power under the FDI
Act to take prompt corrective action to resolve the
problems of insured depository institutions that fall within any
undercapitalized category. In addition, the federal banking
agencies have adopted non-capital safety and soundness standards
relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems and
internal audit systems, (ii) loan documentation,
(iii) credit underwriting, (iv) asset quality and
growth, (v) earnings, (vi) risk management, and
(vii) compensation and benefits.
Premiums
for Deposit Insurance
Through the DIF, the FDIC insures our customer deposits up to
prescribed limits for each depositor. The amount of FDIC
assessments paid by each DIF member institution is based on its
relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital
ratios and other factors. Specifically, the assessment rate is
based on the institutions capitalization risk category and
supervisory subgroup category. An institutions
capitalization risk category is based on the FDICs
determination of whether the institution is well capitalized,
adequately capitalized or less than adequately capitalized. An
institutions supervisory subgroup category is based on the
FDICs assessment of the financial condition of the
institution and the probability that FDIC intervention or other
corrective action will be required.
The assessment rate currently ranges from zero to 27 cents per
$100 of domestic deposits. The FDIC may increase or decrease the
assessment rate schedule on a semi-annual basis. Due principally
to continued growth in deposits, the BIF is nearing its minimum
ratio of 1.25 percent of insured deposits as mandated by
law. The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2006
(FDIRA) provided, among other things, for changes in
the formula and factors to be considered by the FDIC in
calculating the FDIC reserve ratio, assessments and dividends,
and a one-time aggregate assessment credit for depository
institutions in existence on December 31, 1996 (or their
successors) which paid assessments to recapitalize the insurance
funds after the banking crises of the late 1980s and early
1990s. The FDIC issued final regulations, effective
January 1, 2007, implementing the provisions of FDIRA and,
in February 2007, issued for comment guidelines, including
business line concentrations and risk of failure and
12
severity of loss in the event of failure to be used by the FDIC
for possibly raising premiums by up to 0.50 basis points for
large banks with $10 billion or more in assets.
The FDIC may terminate a depository institutions deposit
insurance upon a finding by the FDIC that the institutions
financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution
has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices that pose a risk to
the DIF or they may prejudice the interests of the banks
depositors. The termination of deposit insurance for the Bank
also result in the revocation of the Banks charter by the
DFI.
All FDIC-insured depository institutions must also pay an annual
assessment to provide funds for the payment of interest on bonds
issued by the Financing Corporation, a Federal corporation
chartered under the authority of the Federal Housing Finance
Board. The bonds, commonly referred to as FICO bonds, were
issued to capitalize the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance
Corporation. The FICO assessment rate for the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2006 was 1.24 basis points for each $100 of
assessable deposits. The FICO assessments are adjusted quarterly
to reflect changes in the assessment bases of the FDICs
insurance funds and do not vary depending on a depository
institutions capitalization or supervisory evaluations.
Extensions
of Credit to Insiders and Transactions with
Affiliates
The Federal Reserve Act and FRB Regulation O place
limitations and conditions on loans or extensions of credit to:
|
|
|
|
|
a banks or bank holding companys executive officers,
directors and principal shareholders (i.e., in most cases, those
persons who own, control or have power to vote more than
10 percent of any class of voting securities);
|
|
|
|
any company controlled by any such executive officer, director
or shareholder; or
|
|
|
|
any political or campaign committee controlled by such executive
officer, director or principal shareholder.
|
Loans and leases extended to any of the above persons must
comply with the
loan-to-one-borrower
limits, require prior full board approval when aggregate
extensions of credit to the person exceed specified amounts,
must be made on substantially the same terms (including interest
rates and collateral) as, and follow credit-underwriting
procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing at
the time for comparable transactions with non-insiders, and must
not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present
other unfavorable features. In addition, Regulation O
provides that the aggregate limit on extensions of credit to all
insiders of a bank as a group cannot exceed the banks
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Regulation O
also prohibits a bank from paying an overdraft on an account of
an executive officer or director, except pursuant to a written
pre-authorized interest-bearing extension of credit plan that
specifies a method of repayment or a written pre-authorized
transfer of funds from another account of the officer or
director at the bank.
The Bank also is subject to certain restrictions imposed by
Federal Reserve Act Sections 23A and 23B and FRB
Regulation W on any extensions of credit to, or the
issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of, any
affiliates, the purchase of, or investments in, stock or other
securities thereof, the taking of such securities as collateral
for loans, and the purchase of assets of any affiliates. Such
restrictions prevent any affiliates from borrowing from the Bank
unless the loans are secured by marketable obligations of
designated amounts. Further, such secured loans and investments
to or in any affiliate are limited, individually, to
10.0 percent of our capital and surplus (as defined by
Federal regulations), and such secured loans and investments are
limited, in the aggregate, to 20.0 percent of our capital
and surplus. Some of the entities included in the definition of
an affiliate are parent companies, sister banks, sponsored and
advised companies, investment companies whereby the Banks
affiliate serves as investment advisor, and financial
subsidiaries of the Bank. Additional restrictions on
transactions with affiliates may be imposed on us under the
prompt corrective action provisions of Federal law and the
supervisory authority of the Federal and state banking agencies.
13
USA
PATRIOT Act
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and its implementing regulations
significantly expanded the anti-money laundering and financial
transparency laws. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial
institutions are required to establish and maintain anti-money
laundering programs, which include:
|
|
|
|
|
the establishment of a customer identification program;
|
|
|
|
the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls;
|
|
|
|
the designation of a compliance officer;
|
|
|
|
an ongoing employee training program; and
|
|
|
|
an independent audit function to test the programs.
|
The Bank has adopted comprehensive policies and procedures to
address the requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act. Material
deficiencies in anti-money laundering compliance can result in
public enforcement actions by the banking agencies, including
the imposition of civil money penalties and supervisory
restrictions on growth and expansion. Such enforcement actions
could have serious reputation consequences for Hanmi Financial
and the Bank.
Consumer
Laws
Examination and enforcement by the bank regulatory agencies for
non-compliance with consumer protection laws and their
implementing regulations have become more intense in nature. The
Bank is subject to many Federal consumer protection statutes and
regulations, some of which are discussed below.
The Home Ownership and Equal Protection Act of 1994
(HOEPA) requires extra disclosures and consumer
protections to borrowers for certain lending practices. The term
predatory lending, much like the terms safety
and soundness and unfair and deceptive
practices, is far-reaching and covers a potentially broad
range of behavior. As such, it does not lend itself to a concise
or a comprehensive definition. Typically, predatory lending
involves at least one, and perhaps all three, of the following
elements:
|
|
|
|
|
making unaffordable loans based on the assets of the borrower
rather than on the borrowers ability to repay an
obligation (asset-based lending);
|
|
|
|
inducing a borrower to refinance a loan repeatedly in order to
charge high points and fees each time the loan is refinanced
(loan flipping); and/or
|
|
|
|
engaging in fraud or deception to conceal the true nature of the
loan obligation from an unsuspecting or unsophisticated borrower.
|
Regulatory and banking agency guidelines aimed at curbing
predatory lending significantly widen the pool of high cost home
secured loans covered by HOEPA. In addition, the regulations bar
certain refinances within a year with another loan subject to
HOEPA by the same lender or loan servicer. Lenders also will be
presumed to have violated the law which says loans
should not be made to people unable to repay them
unless they document that the borrower has the ability to repay.
Lenders that violate the rules face cancellation of loans and
penalties equal to the finance charges paid. We do not expect
these rules and potential state action in this area to have a
material impact on our financial condition or results of
operation.
Privacy policies are required by Federal banking regulations
that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions
to disclose non-public information about consumers to
non-affiliated third parties. Pursuant to those rules, financial
institutions must provide:
|
|
|
|
|
initial notices to customers about their privacy policies,
describing the conditions under which they may disclose
non-public personal information to non-affiliated third parties
and affiliates;
|
|
|
|
annual notices of their privacy policies to current customers;
and
|
|
|
|
a reasonable method for customers to opt out of
disclosures to non-affiliated third parties.
|
14
These privacy protections affect how consumer information is
transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed
to outside vendors.
In addition, state laws may impose more restrictive limitations
on the ability of financial institution to disclose such
information. California has adopted such a privacy law that
among other things generally provides that customers must
opt in before information may be disclosed to
certain non-affiliated third parties.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACT Act),
requires financial firms to help deter identity theft, including
developing appropriate fraud response programs, and gives
consumers more control of their credit data. It also
reauthorizes a Federal ban on state laws that interfere with
corporate credit granting and marketing practices. In connection
with FACT Act, financial institution regulatory agencies
proposed rules that would prohibit an institution from using
certain information about a consumer it received from an
affiliate to make a solicitation to the consumer, unless the
consumer has been notified and given a chance to opt out of such
solicitations. A consumers election to opt out would be
applicable for at least five years.
The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check
21) facilitates check truncation and electronic check
exchange by authorizing a new negotiable instrument called a
substitute check, which is the legal equivalent of
an original check. Check 21 does not require banks to create
substitute checks or accept checks electronically; however, it
does require banks to accept a legally equivalent substitute
check in place of an original. In addition to its issuance of
regulations governing substitute checks, the Federal Reserve has
issued final rules governing the treatment of remotely created
checks (sometimes referred to as demand drafts) and
electronic check conversion transactions (involving checks that
are converted to electronic transactions by merchants and other
payees).
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) generally
prohibits discrimination in any credit transaction, whether for
consumer or business purposes, on the basis of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (except in
limited circumstances), receipt of income from public assistance
programs, or good faith exercise of any rights under the
Consumer Credit Protection Act.
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) is designed to
ensure that credit terms are disclosed in a meaningful way so
that consumers may compare credit terms more readily and
knowledgeably. As a result of the TILA, all creditors must use
the same credit terminology to express rates and payments,
including the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the
amount financed, the total of payments and the payment schedule,
among other things.
The Fair Housing Act (FH Act) regulates many
practices, including making it unlawful for any lender to
discriminate in its housing-related lending activities against
any person because of race, color, religion, national origin,
sex, handicap or familial status. A number of lending practices
have been found by the courts to be, or may be considered,
illegal under the FH Act, including some that are not
specifically mentioned in the FH Act itself.
The CRA is intended to encourage insured depository
institutions, while operating safely and soundly, to help meet
the credit needs of their communities. The CRA specifically
directs the Federal regulatory agencies, in examining insured
depository institutions, to assess a banks record of
helping meet the credit needs of its entire community, including
low-and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and
sound banking practices. The CRA further requires the agencies
to take a financial institutions record of meeting its
community credit needs into account when evaluating applications
for, among other things, domestic branches, mergers or
acquisitions, or holding company formations. The agencies use
the CRA assessment factors in order to provide a rating to the
financial institution. The ratings range from a high of
outstanding to a low of substantial
non-compliance. In its last examination for CRA
compliance, as of August 30, 2004, the Bank was rated
Satisfactory.
The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) grew out of
public concern over credit shortages in certain urban
neighborhoods and provides public information that will help
show whether financial institutions are serving the housing
credit needs of the neighborhoods and communities in which they
are located. The HMDA also includes a fair lending
aspect that requires the collection and disclosure of data about
applicant and borrower characteristics as a way of identifying
possible discriminatory lending patterns and enforcing
anti-discrimination statutes. The Federal Reserve Board amended
regulations issued under HMDA to require the reporting for 2004
of certain pricing data with respect to higher priced mortgage
loans. The expanded 2004 HMDA data is being reviewed by Federal
banking agencies and others from a fair lending perspective. We
do not expect that the HMDA data reported by the Bank for 2005
will raise material issues regarding the Banks compliance
with the fair lending laws.
15
The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)
requires lenders to provide borrowers with disclosures regarding
the nature and cost of real estate settlements. Also, RESPA
prohibits certain abusive practices, such as kickbacks, and
places limitations on the amount of escrow accounts. Penalties
under the above laws may include fines, reimbursements and other
penalties.
The National Flood Insurance Act (NFIA) requires
homes in flood-prone areas with mortgages from a federally
regulated lender to have flood insurance. Hurricane Katrina
focused awareness on this requirement. Lenders are required to
provide notice to borrowers of special flood hazard areas and
require such coverage before making, increasing, extending or
renewing such loans. Financial institutions that demonstrate a
pattern and practice of lax compliance are subject to the
issuance of cease and desist orders and the imposition of per
loan civil money penalties, up to a maximum fine, which
currently is $125,000. Fine payments are remitted to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for deposit into the National Flood
Mitigation Fund.
Due to heightened regulatory concern related to compliance with
HOEPA, privacy laws and regulations, FACT, Check 21, ECOA,
TILA, FH Act, CRA, HMDA, RESPA and NFIA generally, the Bank may
incur additional compliance costs or be required to expend
additional funds for CRA investments.
Regulation
of Subsidiaries
Non-bank subsidiaries are subject to additional or separate
regulation and supervision by other state, Federal and
self-regulatory bodies. Chun-Ha and AWI are subject to the
licensing and supervisory authority of the California
Commissioner of Insurance.
In addition to other factors set forth herein, below is a
discussion of certain factors that may affect our financial
operations and should be considered in evaluating us:
Our Southern California business focus and economic
conditions in Southern California could adversely affect our
operations. The Banks operations are
located primarily in Los Angeles and Orange counties. Because of
this geographic concentration, our results depend largely upon
economic conditions in these areas. Deterioration in economic
conditions in the Banks market area, or a significant
natural or man-made disaster in these market areas, could have a
material adverse effect on the quality of the Banks loan
portfolio, the demand for its products and services and on its
overall financial condition and results of operations.
Our concentrations in commercial real estate loans located
primarily in Southern California could have adverse effects on
credit quality. Approximately
33.5 percent of the Banks loan portfolio consists of
commercial real estate and construction loans, primarily in
Southern California. As a result of this concentration, a
deterioration of the Southern California commercial real estate
market could have adverse consequences for the Bank. Among the
factors that could contribute to such a decline are general
economic conditions in Southern California, interest rates and
local market construction and sales activity.
Our earnings are affected by changing interest
rates. Changes in interest rates affect the
level of loans, deposits and investments, the credit profile of
existing loans, the rates received on loans and securities and
the rates paid on deposits and borrowings. Significant
fluctuations in interest rates may have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to government regulations that could limit
or restrict our activities, which in turn could adversely affect
our operations. The financial services
industry is subject to extensive Federal and state supervision
and regulation. Significant new laws, changes in existing laws,
or repeals of existing laws may cause our results to differ
materially. Further, Federal monetary policy, particularly as
implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly
affects credit conditions and a material change in these
conditions could have a material adverse affect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Competition may adversely affect our
performance. The banking and financial
services businesses in our market areas are highly competitive.
We face competition in attracting deposits, in making loans and
attracting and retaining employees. The increasingly competitive
environment is a result of changes in regulation, changes in
16
technology and product delivery systems, new competitors in the
market, and the pace of consolidation among financial services
providers. Our results in the future may differ depending upon
the nature and level of competition.
If a significant number of borrowers, guarantors or
related parties fail to perform as required by the terms of
their loans, we could sustain losses. A
significant source of risk arises from the possibility that
losses will be sustained because borrowers, guarantors or
related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms
of their loans. We have adopted underwriting and credit
monitoring procedures and credit policies, including the
establishment and review of the allowance for loan losses, that
management believes are appropriate to limit this risk by
assessing the likelihood of non-performance, tracking loan
performance and diversifying our credit portfolio. These
policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected
losses that could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Hanmi Financials principal office is located at 3660
Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A, Los Angeles,
California. The office is leased pursuant to a five-year term,
which expires on November 30, 2008.
The following table sets forth information about our offices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/
|
Office
|
|
Type of Office
|
|
Address
|
|
City/State
|
|
Leased
|
|
Corporate Headquarters
|
|
Headquarters(1)
|
|
3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse
Suite A
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Cerritos Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
11754 East Artesia Boulevard
|
|
Artesia, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Downtown Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
950 South Los Angeles Street
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Fashion District Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
726 East 12th Street,
Suite 211
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Garden Grove Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
9820 Garden Grove Boulevard
|
|
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
Owned
|
Gardena Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
2001 West Redondo Beach
Boulevard
|
|
Gardena, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Irvine Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
14474 Culver Drive, Suite D
|
|
Irvine, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Koreatown Galleria Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
3250 West Olympic Boulevard,
Suite 200
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Koreatown Plaza Branch
|
|
Branch(2)
|
|
928 South Western Avenue,
Suite 260
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Mid-Olympic Branch
|
|
Branch(3)
|
|
3099 West Olympic Boulevard
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Owned
|
Olympic Branch
|
|
Branch(4)
|
|
3737 West Olympic Boulevard
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Owned
|
Rowland Heights Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
18720 East Colima Road
|
|
Rowland Heights, CA
|
|
Leased
|
San Diego Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
4637 Convoy Street, Suite 101
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
Leased
|
San Francisco Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
1491 Webster Street
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Silicon Valley Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
2765 El Camino Real
|
|
Santa Clara, CA
|
|
Leased
|
South Cerritos Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
11900 South Street, Suite 109
|
|
Cerritos, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Torrance Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
2370 Crenshaw Boulevard, Suite H
|
|
Torrance, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Van Nuys Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
14427 Sherman Way
|
|
Van Nuys, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Vermont Branch
|
|
Branch(5)
|
|
933 South Vermont Avenue
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Owned
|
West Garden Grove Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
9122 Garden Grove Boulevard
|
|
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
Owned
|
West Torrance Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
21838 Hawthorne Boulevard
|
|
Torrance, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Western Branch
|
|
Branch
|
|
120 South Western Avenue
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Wilshire Branch
|
|
Main
Branch(6)
|
|
3660 Wilshire Boulevard,
Suite 103
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Commercial Loan Department
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3660 Wilshire Boulevard,
Suite 1050
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
SBA Loan Department
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3327 Wilshire Boulevard
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Atlanta LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3585 Peachtree Industrial
Boulevard, Suite 144
|
|
Duluth, GA
|
|
Leased
|
Chicago LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
6200 North Hiawatha, Suite 235
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
Leased
|
Dallas LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
2711 LBJ Freeway, Suite 114
|
|
Farmers Branch, TX
|
|
Leased
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/
|
Office
|
|
Type of Office
|
|
Address
|
|
City/State
|
|
Leased
|
|
Denver LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3033 South Parker Road,
Suite 340
|
|
Aurora, CO
|
|
Leased
|
Northern California LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
39899 Balentine Drive,
Suite 200
|
|
Newark, CA
|
|
Leased
|
Northwest Region LPO No. 1
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
33110 Pacific Highway South,
Suite 4
|
|
Federal Way, WA
|
|
Leased
|
Northwest Region LPO No. 2
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
3500 108th Avenue Northeast,
Suite 280
|
|
Bellevue, WA
|
|
Leased
|
Virginia LPO
|
|
Loan
Office(1)
|
|
7535 Little River Turnpike,
Suite 200B
|
|
Annandale, VA
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deposits are not accepted at this facility. |
|
(2) |
|
Residential Mortgage Center is also located at this
facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Auto Loan Center and Consumer Loan Center are also
located at this facility. |
|
(4) |
|
Training Facility is also located at this facility. |
|
(5) |
|
Administrative offices are also located at this facility. |
|
(6) |
|
International Finance Department is also located at this
facility. |
Hanmi Financial and Hanmi Bank consider their present facilities
to be sufficient for their current operations.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
From time to time, Hanmi Financial and Hanmi Bank are parties to
litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business, such
as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and
servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of
Hanmi Financial and Hanmi Bank. In the opinion of management,
the resolution of any such issues would not have a material
adverse impact on the financial condition, results of
operations, or liquidity of Hanmi Financial or Hanmi Bank.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
During the fourth quarter of 2006, no matters were submitted to
stockholders for a vote.
18
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Information
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low trading prices of Hanmi Financials common
stock for the last two years as reported by NASDAQ under the
symbol HAFC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Cash Dividend
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.88
|
|
|
$
|
18.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
18.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.46
|
|
|
$
|
17.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.95
|
|
|
$
|
17.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06 per share
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.42
|
|
|
$
|
16.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.05 per share
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.72
|
|
|
$
|
16.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.05 per share
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
17.90
|
|
|
$
|
14.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05 per share
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.19
|
|
|
$
|
15.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.05 per share
|
|
Hanmi Financial had 344 registered stockholders of record as of
February 14, 2007.
Dividends
The amount and timing of dividends will be determined by Hanmi
Financials Board of Directors and substantially depend
upon the earnings and financial condition of Hanmi Financial.
The ability of Hanmi Financial to obtain funds for the payment
of dividends and for other cash requirements is largely
dependent on the amount of dividends that may be declared by
Hanmi Bank.
The power of the board of directors of a state chartered bank,
such as Hanmi Bank, to declare a cash dividend is limited by
statutory and regulatory restrictions that restrict the amount
available for cash dividends depending upon the earnings,
financial condition and cash needs of the bank, as well as
general business conditions. See Item 1.
Business Dividends and Other Transfers of
Funds.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
The following table summarizes information as of
December 31, 2006 relating to equity compensation plans of
Hanmi Financial pursuant to which grants of options, restricted
stock awards or other rights to acquire shares may be granted
from time to time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved
By Security Holders
|
|
|
1,755,813
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
2,206,092
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not
Approved By Security Holders
|
|
|
678,502(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Compensation
Plans
|
|
|
2,434,315
|
|
|
$
|
14.79
|
|
|
|
2,206,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Composed of: a) stock options granted to Chief Executive
Officer to purchase 350,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $17.165 per share with vesting in equal annual
installments of 16.66%, subject to accelerated vesting upon
certain corporate transactions, and expiring no later than
November 3, 2014; and b) remaining stock warrants
issued to affiliates of Castle Creek Financial LLC (for services
rendered in connection with the placement of Hanmi
Financials equity securities) to purchase a total of
328,502 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$9.50 per share. |
19
Performance
Graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing stockholder return on Hanmi
Financials common stock valued on the market price of
common stock with the cumulative total returns for companies on
an indexed basis of a $100 investment in Hanmi Financial common
stock, the NASDAQ
Composite®
(U.S.) Index and the Standard and Poors (S&P) 500
Financials Index. The performance graph shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference to any general statement incorporating
by reference this Annual Report into any filing under the
Security Act of 1933 or under the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that we specifically incorporate this information by
reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such
Acts.
COMPARISON
OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN ON $100 INVESTMENT
AMONG HANMI FINANCIAL, NASDAQ COMPOSITE
®
(U.S.) INDEX AND S&P 500 FINANCIALS INDEX COMPARATIVE
RETURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
Index
|
|
|
|
Symbol
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
|
HAFC
|
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
125.24
|
|
|
|
|
148.62
|
|
|
|
|
270.18
|
|
|
|
|
268.53
|
|
|
|
|
338.74
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
|
^IXIC
|
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
68.47
|
|
|
|
|
102.71
|
|
|
|
|
111.53
|
|
|
|
|
113.06
|
|
|
|
|
123.82
|
|
S&P 500 Financials
|
|
|
|
S5FINL
|
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
83.58
|
|
|
|
|
106.92
|
|
|
|
|
115.72
|
|
|
|
|
120.03
|
|
|
|
|
139.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table presents selected historical financial
information, including per share information as adjusted for the
stock dividends and stock splits declared by us. This selected
historical financial data should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
appearing elsewhere in this Report and the information contained
in Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The selected historical financial data as of and for each of
the years in the five years ended December 31, 2006 is
derived from our audited financial statements. In the opinion of
management, the information
20
presented reflects all adjustments, including normal and
recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation
of the results of such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF
INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
260,189
|
|
|
$
|
200,941
|
|
|
$
|
135,554
|
|
|
$
|
77,417
|
|
|
$
|
69,316
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
106,429
|
|
|
|
62,111
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
20,796
|
|
|
|
21,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Before
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
153,760
|
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
102,937
|
|
|
|
56,621
|
|
|
|
47,971
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
|
|
5,680
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
35,604
|
|
|
|
30,382
|
|
|
|
26,211
|
|
|
|
20,022
|
|
|
|
21,204
|
|
Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
75,954
|
|
|
|
69,133
|
|
|
|
66,566
|
|
|
|
39,325
|
|
|
|
38,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision for Income
Taxes
|
|
|
106,237
|
|
|
|
94,684
|
|
|
|
59,675
|
|
|
|
31,638
|
|
|
|
26,042
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
40,588
|
|
|
|
36,455
|
|
|
|
22,975
|
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
|
|
9,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
$
|
19,213
|
|
|
$
|
17,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
|
$
|
163,477
|
|
|
$
|
127,164
|
|
|
$
|
62,595
|
|
|
$
|
122,772
|
|
Total Investment Securities
|
|
|
391,579
|
|
|
|
443,912
|
|
|
|
418,973
|
|
|
|
414,616
|
|
|
|
279,548
|
|
Loans Receivable,
Net(1)
|
|
|
2,837,390
|
|
|
|
2,469,080
|
|
|
|
2,234,842
|
|
|
|
1,248,399
|
|
|
|
975,154
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
|
3,414,252
|
|
|
|
3,104,188
|
|
|
|
1,787,139
|
|
|
|
1,457,313
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
2,944,715
|
|
|
|
2,826,114
|
|
|
|
2,528,807
|
|
|
|
1,445,835
|
|
|
|
1,283,979
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
3,238,126
|
|
|
|
2,987,475
|
|
|
|
2,704,278
|
|
|
|
1,647,672
|
|
|
|
1,332,845
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
426,777
|
|
|
|
399,910
|
|
|
|
139,467
|
|
|
|
124,468
|
|
Tangible Equity
|
|
|
273,159
|
|
|
|
209,028
|
|
|
|
178,791
|
|
|
|
137,424
|
|
|
|
122,304
|
|
Average Net Loans
|
|
|
2,721,229
|
|
|
|
2,359,439
|
|
|
|
1,912,534
|
|
|
|
1,103,765
|
|
|
|
882,625
|
|
Average Investment Securities
|
|
|
414,672
|
|
|
|
418,750
|
|
|
|
425,537
|
|
|
|
379,635
|
|
|
|
244,675
|
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
3,214,761
|
|
|
|
2,871,564
|
|
|
|
2,387,412
|
|
|
|
1,538,820
|
|
|
|
1,222,050
|
|
Average Total Assets
|
|
|
3,602,181
|
|
|
|
3,249,190
|
|
|
|
2,670,701
|
|
|
|
1,623,214
|
|
|
|
1,308,885
|
|
Average Deposits
|
|
|
2,881,448
|
|
|
|
2,632,254
|
|
|
|
2,129,724
|
|
|
|
1,416,564
|
|
|
|
1,164,562
|
|
Average Borrowings
|
|
|
221,347
|
|
|
|
165,482
|
|
|
|
223,780
|
|
|
|
63,138
|
|
|
|
21,847
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing
Liabilities
|
|
|
2,367,389
|
|
|
|
2,046,227
|
|
|
|
1,687,688
|
|
|
|
1,057,249
|
|
|
|
854,858
|
|
Average Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
458,227
|
|
|
|
417,813
|
|
|
|
293,313
|
|
|
|
132,369
|
|
|
|
112,927
|
|
Average Tangible Equity
|
|
|
242,362
|
|
|
|
198,527
|
|
|
|
143,262
|
|
|
|
130,252
|
|
|
|
110,762
|
|
PER SHARE DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
Earnings Per Share
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Book Value Per
Share(2)
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
$
|
8.77
|
|
|
$
|
8.11
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
Tangible Book Value Per
Share(3)
|
|
$
|
5.57
|
|
|
$
|
4.30
|
|
|
$
|
3.62
|
|
|
$
|
4.85
|
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
Cash Dividends Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
49,076,613
|
|
|
|
48,658,798
|
|
|
|
49,330,704
|
|
|
|
28,326,820
|
|
|
|
27,830,866
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loans are net of deferred fees and related direct costs. |
|
(2) |
|
Total shareholders equity divided by common shares
outstanding. |
|
(3) |
|
Tangible equity divided by common shares outstanding. |
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
SELECTED PERFORMANCE
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average
Assets(4)
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
Return on Average
Shareholders
Equity(5)
|
|
|
14.33
|
%
|
|
|
13.94
|
%
|
|
|
12.51
|
%
|
|
|
14.51
|
%
|
|
|
15.08
|
%
|
Return on Average Tangible
Equity(6)
|
|
|
27.09
|
%
|
|
|
29.33
|
%
|
|
|
25.62
|
%
|
|
|
14.75
|
%
|
|
|
15.38
|
%
|
Net Interest
Spread(7)
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
3.06
|
%
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
Net Interest
Margin(8)
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
Efficiency
Ratio(9)
|
|
|
40.11
|
%
|
|
|
40.86
|
%
|
|
|
51.54
|
%
|
|
|
51.31
|
%
|
|
|
55.41
|
%
|
Dividend Payout
Ratio(10)
|
|
|
17.91
|
%
|
|
|
16.95
|
%
|
|
|
22.99
|
%
|
|
|
29.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Average Shareholders Equity
to Average Total Assets
|
|
|
12.72
|
%
|
|
|
12.86
|
%
|
|
|
10.98
|
%
|
|
|
8.15
|
%
|
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
SELECTED CAPITAL
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital to Total
Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
12.55
|
%
|
|
|
12.04
|
%
|
|
|
11.98
|
%
|
|
|
11.13
|
%
|
|
|
12.14
|
%
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
12.28
|
%
|
|
|
11.98
|
%
|
|
|
11.80
|
%
|
|
|
11.09
|
%
|
|
|
11.94
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital to Total
Risk-Weighted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
11.58
|
%
|
|
|
11.03
|
%
|
|
|
10.93
|
%
|
|
|
10.05
|
%
|
|
|
11.01
|
%
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
11.31
|
%
|
|
|
10.96
|
%
|
|
|
10.75
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
10.81
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital to Average
Total Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
|
10.08
|
%
|
|
|
9.11
|
%
|
|
|
8.93
|
%
|
|
|
7.80
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
9.85
|
%
|
|
|
9.06
|
%
|
|
|
8.78
|
%
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
|
8.34
|
%
|
SELECTED ASSET QUALITY
RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans to Total
Gross
Loans(11)
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
Non-Performing Assets to Total
Assets(12)
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to
Average Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total
Gross Loans
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to
Non-Performing Loans
|
|
|
193.86
|
%
|
|
|
246.40
|
%
|
|
|
377.49
|
%
|
|
|
154.13
|
%
|
|
|
173.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Net income divided by average total assets. |
|
(5) |
|
Net income divided by average shareholders equity. |
|
(6) |
|
Net income divided by average tangible equity. |
|
(7) |
|
Average yield earned on interest-earning assets less average
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(8) |
|
Net interest income before provision for credit losses
divided by average interest-earning assets. |
|
(9) |
|
Total non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net
interest income before provision for credit losses and total
non-interest income. |
|
(10) |
|
Dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per
share. |
|
(11) |
|
Non-performing loans consist of non-accrual loans, loans past
due 90 days or more and restructured loans. |
|
(12) |
|
Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans and
other real estate owned. |
22
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
Return
on Average Tangible Equity
Return on average tangible equity is supplemental financial
information determined by a method other than in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP). This non-GAAP measure is used by
management in the analysis of Hanmi Financials
performance. Average tangible equity is calculated by
subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit intangible
assets from average shareholders equity. Banking and
financial institution regulators also exclude goodwill and
intangibles from shareholders equity when assessing the
capital adequacy of a financial institution. Management believes
the presentation of this financial measure excluding the impact
of these items provides useful supplemental information that is
essential to a proper understanding of the financial results of
Hanmi Financial, as it provides a method to assess
managements success in utilizing tangible capital. This
disclosure should not be viewed as a substitution for results
determined in accordance with GAAP, nor is it necessarily
comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be
presented by other companies.
The following table reconciles this non-GAAP performance measure
to the GAAP performance measure for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Average Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
458,227
|
|
|
$
|
417,813
|
|
|
$
|
293,313
|
|
|
$
|
132,369
|
|
|
$
|
112,927
|
|
Less Average Goodwill and Core
Deposit Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(215,865
|
)
|
|
|
(219,286
|
)
|
|
|
(150,051
|
)
|
|
|
(2,117
|
)
|
|
|
(2,165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Tangible
Equity
|
|
$
|
242,362
|
|
|
$
|
198,527
|
|
|
$
|
143,262
|
|
|
$
|
130,252
|
|
|
$
|
110,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
14.33
|
%
|
|
|
13.94
|
%
|
|
|
12.51
|
%
|
|
|
14.51
|
%
|
|
|
15.08
|
%
|
Effect of Average Goodwill and
Core Deposit Intangible Assets
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
15.39
|
%
|
|
|
13.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Tangible
Equity
|
|
|
27.09
|
%
|
|
|
29.33
|
%
|
|
|
25.62
|
%
|
|
|
14.75
|
%
|
|
|
15.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible
Book Value Per Share
Tangible book value per share is supplemental financial
information determined by a method other than in accordance with
GAAP. This non-GAAP measure is used by management in the
analysis of Hanmi Financials performance. Tangible book
value per share is calculated by subtracting goodwill and core
deposit intangible assets from total shareholders equity
and dividing the difference by the number of shares of common
stock outstanding. Management believes the presentation of this
financial measure excluding the impact of these items provides
useful supplemental information that is essential to a proper
understanding of the financial results of Hanmi Financial, as it
provides a method to assess managements success in
utilizing tangible capital. This disclosure should not be viewed
as a substitution for results determined in accordance with
GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance
measures that may be presented by other companies.
23
The following table reconciles this non-GAAP performance measure
to the GAAP performance measure for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
487,117
|
|
|
$
|
426,777
|
|
|
$
|
399,910
|
|
|
$
|
139,467
|
|
|
$
|
124,468
|
|
Less Goodwill and Core Deposit
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(213,958
|
)
|
|
|
(217,749
|
)
|
|
|
(221,119
|
)
|
|
|
(2,043
|
)
|
|
|
(2,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Equity
|
|
$
|
273,159
|
|
|
$
|
209,028
|
|
|
$
|
178,791
|
|
|
$
|
137,424
|
|
|
$
|
122,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
9.93
|
|
|
$
|
8.77
|
|
|
$
|
8.11
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
|
$
|
4.47
|
|
Effect of Goodwill and Core
Deposit Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(4.36
|
)
|
|
|
(4.47
|
)
|
|
|
(4.49
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Book Value Per
Share
|
|
$
|
5.57
|
|
|
$
|
4.30
|
|
|
$
|
3.62
|
|
|
$
|
4.85
|
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
This discussion presents managements analysis of the
financial condition and results of operations as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and the notes related thereto presented
elsewhere in this Report.
This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking
statements because of certain factors discussed elsewhere in
this report. See Item 1A. Risk Factors.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We have established various accounting policies that govern the
application of accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America in the preparation of our financial
statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain accounting policies require us to make significant
estimates and assumptions that have a material impact on the
carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we
consider these critical accounting policies. We use estimates
and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results could differ significantly from these estimates and
assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying
value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and
our results of operations for the reporting periods. Management
has discussed the development and selection of these critical
accounting policies with the Audit Committee of Hanmi
Financials Board of Directors.
Allowance for Loan Losses We believe the
allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet
items are critical accounting policies that require significant
estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in the preparation of our financial
statements. Our allowance for loan loss methodologies
incorporate a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative
and qualitative, in establishing an allowance for loan loss that
management believes is appropriate at each reporting date.
Quantitative factors include our historical loss experiences on
ten segmented loan pools by risk rating, delinquency and
charge-off trends, collateral values, changes in non-performing
loans, and other factors. Qualitative factors include the
general economic environment in our markets, delinquency and
charge-off trends, and the change in non-performing loans.
Concentration of credit, change of lending management and staff,
quality of loan review system, and change in interest rate are
other qualitative factors that are considered in our
methodologies. See Financial Condition
Allowance for Loan Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet
Items, Results of Operations Provision
for Credit Losses and Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, Note 1 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies for additional
information on methodologies used to determine the allowance for
loan losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items.
24
Loan Sales We routinely sell SBA and
residential mortgage loans to secondary market investors. When
SBA guaranteed loans are sold, we generally retain the right to
service these loans and we may retain residual and other
interests, which are considered retained interests in the sold
loans. The gain on sale recorded on these loans depends, in
part, on our allocation of the previous carrying amount of the
loans to the retained interests. Previous carrying amounts are
allocated in proportion to the relative fair values of the loans
sold and the interests retained. The fair values of retained
interests are estimated based upon the present value of the
associated expected future cash flows taking into consideration
future prepayment rates, discount rates, expected credit losses
and other factors that impact the value of the retained
interests.
We may also record loan servicing assets when the benefits of
servicing are expected to be more than adequate compensation to
a servicer. We determine whether the benefits of servicing are
expected to be more than adequate compensation to a servicer by
discounting all of the future net cash flows associated with the
contractual rights and obligations of the servicing agreement.
The expected future net cash flows are discounted at a rate
equal to the return that would adequately compensate a
substitute servicer for performing the servicing. In addition to
the anticipated rate of loan prepayments and discount rates,
other assumptions (such as the cost to service the underlying
loans, foreclosure costs, ancillary income and float rates) are
also used in determining the value of the loan servicing assets.
Loan servicing assets are discussed in more detail in
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies and
Note 6 Loan Servicing Asset
presented elsewhere herein.
OVERVIEW
Over the last two years, we have experienced significant growth
in assets and deposits. During this same period, interest rates
have increased, increasing our net interest margin, while
competitive pricing pressures have depressed our net interest
margin. Total assets increased to $3,725.2 million at
December 31, 2006 from $3,414.3 million and
$3,104.2 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Net loans increased to $2,837.4 million at
December 31, 2006 from $2,469.1 million and
$2,234.8 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Total deposits increased to $2,944.7 million
at December 31, 2006 from $2,826.1 million and
$2,528.8 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
On April 30, 2004, we completed the merger with PUB, which
had assets of $1.2 billion. Therefore, operating results
for the year ended December 31, 2004 include eight months
of operations of the combined entity and the trends in earnings
from 2004 to 2005 reflect an increase in average total assets
from $2.67 billion for the year ended December 31,
2004 to $3.25 billion for the year ended December 31,
2005.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, net income was
$65.6 million, representing an increase of
$7.4 million, or 12.7 percent, from $58.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005. This resulted in
basic earnings per share of $1.34 and $1.18 for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and diluted
earnings per share of $1.33 and $1.17 for the same years. Our
primary source of revenue is net interest income, which is the
difference between interest and fees derived from earning assets
and interest paid on liabilities incurred to fund those assets.
Net interest income is affected by changes in the volume of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It
also is affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning
assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The
increase in net income for 2006 was primarily attributable to an
increase in average interest-earning assets. Net interest income
increased by 10.8 percent from 2005 to 2006, which was
primarily attributable to a 15.4 percent increase in the
volume of average gross loans. At the same time, the average
interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased by
146 basis points while the average interest rate earned on
interest-earning assets increased by 109 basis points. As a
result, the net interest spread decreased by 37 basis
points from 3.96 percent in 2005 to 3.59 percent in
2006.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net income was
$58.2 million, representing an increase of
$21.5 million, or 58.7 percent, from
$36.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
This resulted in basic earnings per share of $1.18 and $0.87 for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
and diluted earnings per share of $1.17 and $0.84 for the same
years. The increase in net income for 2005 was attributable to
increases in net interest margin and average interest-earning
assets. Net interest income increased due to a 23.2 percent
increase in the volume of average gross loans. The average
interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased by
111
25
basis points while the average interest rate earned on
interest-earning assets increased by 132 basis points. As a
result, the net interest spread increased by 21 basis
points from 3.75 percent in 2004 to 3.96 percent in
2005.
Our results of operations are significantly affected by the
provision for credit losses. The provision for credit losses was
$7.2 million, $5.4 million and $2.9 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, reflecting changes in the
balance and credit quality of the loan portfolio.
We also generated substantial non-interest income from service
charges on deposit accounts, charges and fees from international
trade finance, and gains on sales of loans. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, non-interest income was
$35.6 million, an increase of $5.2 million, or
17.2 percent, over 2005 non-interest income of
$30.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2005,
non-interest income was $30.4 million, an increase of
$4.2 million, or 15.9 percent, over 2004 non-interest
income of $26.2 million.
Non-interest expenses consist primarily of employee compensation
and benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses and data
processing expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2006,
non-interest expenses were $76.0 million, an increase of
$6.8 million, or 9.9 percent, over 2005 non-interest
expenses of $69.1 million. In 2006, the increase was
primarily the result of higher compensation and an increase in
total assets. Although non-interest expenses increased from the
prior year, the efficiency ratio improved slightly to
40.11 percent compared to 40.86 percent in 2005. This
improvement is attributable to greater operating efficiencies
arising from economies of scale. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, non-interest expenses were
$69.1 million, an increase of $2.6 million, or
3.9 percent, over 2004 non-interest expenses of
$66.6 million. This increase was primarily the result of
the merger with PUB. The efficiency ratio improved to
40.86 percent in 2005 compared to 51.54 percent in
2004 as the Bank achieved greater operating efficiencies after
completing the integration of PUBs operations into the
Banks, whereas 2004 non-interest expenses included the
cost of parallel operations and non-recurring expenses
associated with the merger.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
Net
Interest Income, Net Interest Spread and Net Interest
Margin
|
Our earnings depend largely upon the difference between the
interest income received from our loan portfolio and other
interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and
borrowings. The difference is net interest income.
The difference between the yield earned on interest-earning
assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities is net
interest spread. Net interest income, when expressed as a
percentage of average total interest-earning assets, is referred
to as the net interest margin.
Net interest income is affected by the change in the level and
mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
referred to as volume changes. Our net interest
income also is affected by changes in the yields earned on
interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing
liabilities, referred to as rate changes. Interest
rates charged on loans are affected principally by the demand
for such loans, the supply of money available for lending
purposes and competitive factors. Those factors are, in turn,
affected by general economic conditions and other factors beyond
our control, such as Federal economic policies, the general
supply of money in the economy, income tax policies,
governmental budgetary matters and the actions of the FRB.
26
The following table shows the average balances of assets,
liabilities and shareholders equity; the amount of
interest income and interest expense; the average yield or rate
for each category of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities; and the net interest spread and
the net interest margin for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loans,
Net(1)
|
|
$
|
2,747,922
|
|
|
$
|
239,075
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,382,230
|
|
|
$
|
180,845
|
|
|
|
7.59
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,933,761
|
|
|
$
|
117,999
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
Municipal
Securities(2)
|
|
|
72,694
|
|
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
74,166
|
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
|
|
70,372
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
4.28
|
%
|
Obligations of Other
U.S. Government Agencies
|
|
|
122,503
|
|
|
|
5,148
|
|
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
|
102,703
|
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
90,336
|
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
%
|
Other Debt Securities
|
|
|
219,475
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
|
241,881
|
|
|
|
10,271
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
264,829
|
|
|
|
10,261
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
24,684
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
%
|
|
|
23,571
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
|
15,041
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
27,410
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
|
|
46,799
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
|
|
12,772
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Deposits
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
3,214,761
|
|
|
|
260,189
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
%
|
|
|
2,871,564
|
|
|
|
200,941
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
2,387,412
|
|
|
|
135,554
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
93,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
(26,693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
320,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noninterest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
387,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,602,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,249,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,670,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
107,811
|
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
138,167
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
131,589
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
Money Market Checking and NOW
Accounts
|
|
|
471,780
|
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
|
|
539,678
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
466,880
|
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
1,286,202
|
|
|
|
64,184
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
|
959,904
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
611,555
|
|
|
|
10,966
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
280,249
|
|
|
|
12,460
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
242,996
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
253,884
|
|
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
138,941
|
|
|
|
6,977
|
|
|
|
5.02
|
%
|
|
|
83,076
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
141,374
|
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
7.79
|
%
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
3,044
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
2,367,389
|
|
|
|
106,429
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
2,046,227
|
|
|
|
62,111
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
1,687,688
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand Deposits
|
|
|
735,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
41,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noninterest-Bearing
Liabilities
|
|
|
776,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
3,143,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,831,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,377,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
458,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
3,602,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,249,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,670,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
102,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest
Spread(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest
Margin(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loans are net of deferred fees
and related direct costs. Loan fees have been included in the
calculation of interest income. Loan fees were
$4.8 million, $6.3 million and $6.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Tax-exempt income, computed on a
tax-equivalent basis using an effective marginal rate of
35 percent, was $4.7 million, $4.8 million and
$4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. Yields on tax-exempt income were
6.53 percent, 6.48 percent and 6.59 percent for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the average yield
earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents net interest income
as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
27
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
dollar amount of changes in interest earned and paid for
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the
amount of change attributable to changes in average daily
balances (volume) or changes in average daily interest rates
(rate). The variances attributable to both the volume and rate
changes have been allocated to volume and rate changes in
proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of
the changes in each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006 vs. 2005
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Due to Change in
|
|
|
Due to Change in
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loans, Net
|
|
$
|
29,839
|
|
|
$
|
28,391
|
|
|
$
|
58,230
|
|
|
$
|
30,620
|
|
|
$
|
32,226
|
|
|
$
|
62,846
|
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
Obligations of Other
U.S. Government Agencies
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
Other Debt Securities
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
391
|
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Deposits
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income
|
|
|
28,837
|
|
|
|
30,411
|
|
|
|
59,248
|
|
|
|
31,658
|
|
|
|
33,729
|
|
|
|
65,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW
Accounts
|
|
|
(1,773
|
)
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
|
|
4,866
|
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
13,068
|
|
|
|
19,132
|
|
|
|
32,200
|
|
|
|
8,385
|
|
|
|
12,633
|
|
|
|
21,018
|
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
5,346
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
(1,685
|
)
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
14,536
|
|
|
|
29,782
|
|
|
|
44,318
|
|
|
|
7,954
|
|
|
|
21,540
|
|
|
|
29,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Interest
Income
|
|
$
|
14,301
|
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
14,930
|
|
|
$
|
23,704
|
|
|
$
|
12,189
|
|
|
$
|
35,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, net
interest income was $153.8 million and $138.8 million,
respectively. The net interest spread and net interest margin
for the year ended December 31, 2006 were 3.59 percent
and 4.78 percent, respectively, compared to
3.96 percent and 4.83 percent, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, net
interest income was $138.8 million and $102.9 million,
respectively. The net interest spread and net interest margin
for the year ended December 31, 2005 were 3.96 percent
and 4.83 percent, respectively, compared to
3.75 percent and 4.31 percent, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2004.
Average interest-earning assets increased 12.0 percent to
$3,214.8 million in 2006 from $2,871.6 million in
2005. Average gross loans increased 15.4 percent to
$2,747.9 million in 2006 from $2,382.2 million in
2005, and average investment securities decreased
1.0 percent to $414.7 million in 2006 from
$418.8 million in 2005. Total
28
loan interest income increased by 32.2 percent in 2006 due
to the increase in average gross loans outstanding and the
increase in the average yield on loans from 7.59 percent in
2005 to 8.70 percent in 2006. The average interest rate
charged on loans increased 111 basis points, reflecting the
increase in the annual average WSJ Prime Rate of 182 basis
points from 6.14 percent in 2005 to 7.96 percent in
2006. The yield on average interest-earning assets increased
from 7.00 percent in 2005 to 8.09 percent in 2006, an
increase of 109 basis points, reflecting a continued shift
in the mix of average interest-earning assets from
83.0 percent loans, 14.6 percent securities and
2.4 percent other interest-earning assets in 2005 to
85.5 percent loans, 12.9 percent securities and
1.6 percent other interest-earning assets in 2006.
The majority of interest-earning assets growth in 2006 was
funded by a $249.2 million, or 9.5 percent, increase
in average total deposits. Total average interest-bearing
liabilities grew by $321.2 million, or 15.7 percent to
$2,367.4 million in 2006 compared to $2,046.2 million
in 2005. The average interest rate paid for interest-bearing
liabilities increased by 146 basis points from 3.04 percent
in 2005 to 4.50 percent in 2006 due to competitive pricing.
As a result of the increases in the yield on interest-earning
assets and cost of interest-bearing liabilities, the net
interest spread decreased to 3.59 percent in 2006 compared
to 3.96 percent in 2005.
Short-term interest rates rose in the first half of 2006, as the
FRB increased the targeted Federal funds rate from
4.25 percent as of December 31, 2005 to
5.25 percent by July 3, 2006, through a series of four
25 basis-point increases. During this period, long-term rates
increased more slowly, with the yields on ten-year
U.S. Treasury bonds increasing from 4.39 percent as of
December 31, 2005 to a peak of 5.25 percent as of
June 28, 2006, before decreasing again to 4.71 percent
as of December 31, 2006, and the yield curve was inverted,
that is, long-term rates exceeded short-term rates, for much of
2006. In this environment, and particularly in the first half of
2006, there was heavy demand among our customers for longer-term
fixed-rate loans. This competitive environment placed pressure
on loan portfolio yields, which flattened and, in the fourth
quarter, declined slightly, as customers demanded more favorable
pricing for both fixed-rate and floating-rate loans.
Interest rates on time deposits rose as customers, anticipating
continued rate increases, demanded higher rates during the first
half of the year. During this period, the Bank faced strong
competitive pressures from established and newly organized banks
serving its target market. During the second half of 2006, these
competitive pressures lessened, as market participants made
greater use of borrowings to control their costs of funds and
customer expectations regarding continued rate increases
changed. Nevertheless, the Banks cost of time deposits
continued to rise, as certificates of deposit, which have an
average maturity of approximately five months, continued to
re-price. The Bank was able to more effectively control its cost
of savings, NOW and money market accounts, but experienced
declines in their balances as customers shifted funds to
higher-rate accounts.
Average interest-earning assets increased 20.3 percent to
$2,871.6 million in 2005 from $2,387.4 million in
2004. Average gross loans increased 23.2 percent to
$2,382.2 million in 2005 from $1,933.8 million in
2004, and average investment securities decreased
1.6 percent to $418.8 million in 2005 from
$425.5 million in 2004. Total loan interest income
increased by 53.3 percent in 2005 due to the increase in
average gross loans outstanding and the increase in the average
yield on loans from 6.10 percent in 2004 to
7.59 percent in 2005. The average interest rate charged on
loans increased 149 basis points, reflecting the increase
in the WSJ Prime Rate of 180 basis points from
4.34 percent in 2004 to 6.14 percent in 2005. The
yield on average interest-earning assets increased from
5.68 percent in 2004 to 7.00 percent in 2005, an
increase of 132 basis points, reflecting a shift in the mix
of average interest-earning assets from 81.0 percent loans,
17.8 percent securities and 1.2 percent other
interest-earning assets in 2004 to 83.0 percent loans,
14.6 percent securities and 2.4 percent other
interest-earning assets in 2005.
The majority of interest-earning assets growth in 2005 was
funded by a $502.5 million, or 23.6 percent, increase
in average total deposits. Total average interest-bearing
liabilities grew by 21.2 percent to $2,046.2 million
in 2005 compared to $1,687.7 million in 2004. The average
interest rate paid for interest-bearing liabilities increased by
111 basis points from 1.93 percent in 2004 to
3.04 percent in 2005 due to competitive pricing. As a
result of the increases in the yield on interest-earning assets
and cost of interest-bearing liabilities, the net interest
spread increased to 3.96 percent in 2005 compared to
3.75 percent in 2004.
The 2005 net interest spread reflects the increase in the
average balance of Federal funds sold, which are highly liquid
but have a relatively low yield, from $12.8 million in 2004
to $46.8 million in 2005. The average yield on
29
Federal funds sold was 3.40 percent and 1.43 percent
in 2005 and 2004, respectively. In the second half of 2005, the
Bank increased its rates on certificates of deposit to maintain
relationships with valued customers and fund loan growth. In
2005, loan production increased 32.2 percent over 2004
levels. This trend was particularly evident in the second
quarter of 2005 and continued throughout the second half of the
year, during which production was 37.4 percent higher than
2004 levels. However, because of the flat yield curve (long-term
interest rates were unusually low relative to short-term rates,
approaching and briefly falling below short-term rates) and
strong competition, the Bank experienced a high level of loan
payoffs because management was unwilling to match the aggressive
pricing on five- to seven-year fixed-rate loans offered to our
customers by certain competitors.
Provision
for Credit Losses
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the provision for
credit losses was $7.2 million, compared to
$5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, an
increase of 33.0 percent. The allowance for loan losses was
0.96 percent and 1.00 percent of total gross loans at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, with the increase
in the dollar amount allowed for credit losses due to an
increase in loan volume. This was primarily due to the overall
decrease in historical loss factors on pass grade loans, while
non-performing assets increased from $10.1 million, or
0.41 percent of gross loans, as of December 31, 2005
to $14.2 million, or 0.50 percent of gross loans, as
of December 31, 2006. The $368.3 million, or
14.9 percent, increase in the loan portfolio and the
$4.1 million, or 40.3 percent, increase in
non-performing assets required the provision to increase to
$7.2 million in 2006 from $5.4 million in 2005 to
maintain the necessary allowance level.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, the provision for
credit losses was $5.4 million, compared to
$2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an
increase of 85.6 percent. The allowance for loan losses
remained at 1.00 percent of total gross loans at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, with the increase in the dollar
amount allowed for credit losses due to an increase in loan
volume. This was primarily due to the overall decrease in
historical loss factors on pass grade loans, while
non-performing assets increased from $6.1 million, or
0.27 percent of gross loans, as of December 31, 2004
to $10.1 million, or 0.41 percent of gross loans, as
of December 31, 2005. The $235.2 million, or
10.4 percent, increase in the loan portfolio and the
$4.1 million, or 68.5 percent, increase in
non-performing assets required the provision to increase to
$5.4 million in 2005 from $2.9 million in 2004 to
maintain the necessary allowance level.
Non-Interest
Income
The following table sets forth the various components of
non-interest income for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
|
$
|
17,134
|
|
|
$
|
15,782
|
|
|
$
|
14,441
|
|
Trade Finance Fees
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
Remittance Fees
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
Other Service Charges and Fees
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Income
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Increase in Fair Value of
Derivatives
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
Gain on Sales of Loans
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
Gain on Sales of Securities
Available for Sale
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest
Income
|
|
$
|
35,604
|
|
|
$
|
30,382
|
|
|
$
|
26,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We earn non-interest income from three major sources: service
charges on deposit accounts, fees generated from international
trade finance and gain on sales of loans. Non-interest income
has become a significant part of revenue in the past several
years. For the year ended December 31, 2006, non-interest
income was $35.6 million, an increase of 17.2 percent
from $30.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2005. The overall increase in non-interest income is primarily
due to expansion in the Banks loan and deposit portfolios.
30
Service charges on deposit accounts increased $1.4 million,
or 8.6 percent, in 2006 compared to 2005 and increased
$1.3 million, or 9.3 percent, in 2005 compared to
2004. Service charge income on deposit accounts increased in
2006 and 2005 due to an increase in the number of accounts and
an increase in demand deposit transaction volume. Average demand
deposits decreased by 2.1 percent to $735.4 million in
2006 from $751.5 million in 2005 and increased by
12.9 percent to $751.5 million in 2005 from
$665.8 million in 2004. Service charges are constantly
reviewed to maximize service charge income while still
maintaining a competitive position.
Fees generated from international trade finance increased by
7.0 percent from $4.3 million in 2005 to
$4.6 million in 2006 and increased 5.6 percent from
$4.0 million in 2004 to $4.3 million in 2005. The
increase was primarily due to the PUB merger. Trade finance fees
relate primarily to import and export letters of credit.
Remittance fees decreased 3.1 percent and increased
28.4 percent in 2006 and 2005, respectively, to
$2.1 million in 2006 from $2.1 million in 2005 and
$1.7 million in 2004. The slight decrease in 2006 reflects
slightly lower volumes compared to the prior year. The 2005
increase reflects increased volume derived from Hanmi
Banks close relationship with Korea Exchange Bank, a
stockholder of Hanmi Financial.
The changes in the fair value of derivatives are caused
primarily by movements in the indexes to which interest rates on
certain certificates of deposit are tied. In 2005 and 2004, the
Bank offered certificates of deposit tied to either the
Standard & Poors 500 Index or a basket of Asian
currencies. As explained in Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, Note 16
Derivatives, the Bank entered into swap transactions
to hedge the market risk associated with such certificates of
deposit. The swaps and the related derivatives embedded in the
certificates of deposit are accounted for at fair value. The
increases in the fair value of the swaps of $1.1 million,
$1.1 million and $232,000 recorded in non-interest income
in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are partially offset by
changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives recorded
in non-interest expenses. See Non-Interest
Expenses.
Gain on sales of loans was $6.9 million in 2006, compared
to $3.0 million in each of 2005 and 2004, representing
increases of 129.0 percent and 0.8 percent for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
increase in gain on sales of loans resulted from increased sales
activity in SBA loans, which was primarily due to increased loan
production and sales efforts, including the sale of some of the
unguaranteed portions of SBA loans. The guaranteed portion of a
substantial percentage of SBA loans is sold in the secondary
markets, and servicing rights are retained. During 2006, there
were $131.0 million of SBA loans sold, compared to
$50.6 million in 2005 and $51.3 million in 2004. The
lower premiums earned in 2005 reflect a greater use of brokers
to refer loan applications, which causes a higher cost to
originate loans, compared to retail originations through the
branch network.
Non-Interest
Expenses
The following table sets forth the breakdown of non-interest
expenses for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
$
|
40,512
|
|
|
$
|
36,839
|
|
|
$
|
33,540
|
|
Occupancy and Equipment
|
|
|
10,130
|
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
Data Processing
|
|
|
4,939
|
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
Advertising and Promotion
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
3,001
|
|
Supplies and Communications
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
Professional Fees
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
Amortization of Core Deposit
Intangible
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded
Option
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Expenses
|
|
|
10,114
|
|
|
|
7,778
|
|
|
|
8,961
|
|
Merger-Related Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest
Expenses
|
|
$
|
75,954
|
|
|
$
|
69,133
|
|
|
$
|
66,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
For the year ended December 31, 2006, non-interest expenses
were $76.0 million, an increase of $6.8 million, or
9.9 percent, from $69.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. For the year ended December 31,
2005, non-interest expenses were $69.1 million, an increase
of $2.6 million, or 3.9 percent, from
$66.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The increase in 2006 was primarily the result of higher
compensation and an increase in total assets. The increase in
2005 was primarily due to the PUB merger, which closed on
April 30, 2004.
Salaries and employee benefits expenses for 2006 increased
$3.7 million, or 10.0 percent, to $40.5 million
from $36.8 million for 2005. Salaries and employee benefits
expenses for 2005 increased $3.3 million, or
9.8 percent, to $36.8 million from $33.5 million
for 2004. These increases were due primarily to annual salary
increases, additional share-based compensation reflecting stock
options granted and an increase in the average number of
employees. Average headcount was 589, 535 and 503 in 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively, representing increases of
10.1 percent, 6.4 percent and 36.5 percent,
respectively, over the prior years. Assets per employee were
$6.3 million at December 31, 2006, compared to
$6.2 million and $5.8 million at December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, representing
increases of 1.6 percent and 6.9 percent,
respectively. The improvement in 2005 reflects the greater
operating efficiencies achieved following the merger with PUB.
The efficiencies were substantially achieved by March 2005.
Occupancy and equipment expenses for 2006 increased
$1.1 million, or 12.8 percent, to $10.1 million
from $9.0 million for 2005. Occupancy and equipment
expenses for 2005 increased $880,000, or 10.9 percent, to
$9.0 million compared to $8.1 million for 2004. The
increase in 2006 was due to additional office space leased. The
increase in 2005 was mainly due to the acquisition of 12 former
PUB branches in April 2004, which increased the branch network
to 27 facilities. Following the closure of four branches in
October 2004 and an additional branch closure in January 2005,
the Bank now operates 22 branches.
Data processing expense for 2006 increased $95,000, or
2.0 percent, to $4.9 million as a result of expenses
associated with a 9.5 percent increase in average deposits
and a 15.4 percent increase in average loans outstanding.
Data processing expense for 2005 increased $304,000, or
6.7 percent, to $4.8 million from $4.5 million
for 2004 as a result of a 28.5 percent increase in average
deposits and a 23.2 percent increase in average loans
outstanding. In 2004, additional expense was incurred because of
the need to operate parallel systems until the conversion of the
Banks core data processing systems.
Professional fees were $1.9 million in 2006, representing a
decrease of $291,000, or 13.2 percent, compared to
$2.2 million in 2005. Professional fees were
$2.2 million in 2005, representing an increase of $133,000,
or 6.4 percent, compared to $2.1 million in 2004. The
decrease in 2006 was caused primarily by higher regulatory
compliance consulting fees in 2005.
Other operating expenses were $10.1 million for 2006,
compared to $7.8 million for 2005, representing an increase
of $2.3 million, or 30.0 percent. The increase is
primarily attributable to a $534,000 operating loss related to
an international trade transaction, amortization expense of
$879,000 related to the termination in the fourth quarter of
2005 of interest rate swaps that had unrealized losses
aggregating $2.1 million, and a $355,000 impairment charge
to adjust the loan servicing asset to fair value. Other
operating expenses were $7.8 million for 2005, compared to
$9.0 million for 2004, representing a decrease of
$1.2 million, or 13.2 percent. The decreases are
primarily attributable to a $1.2 million decrease in loan
referral fees from 2004 to 2005.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, restructuring
charges totaling $2.1 million were recorded in connection
with the acquisition of PUB, consisting of employee severance
and retention bonuses, leasehold termination costs, and fixed
asset impairment charges associated with planned branch
closures. In 2004, $975,000 of restructuring costs was
recognized related to retention bonuses paid to former PUB
employees. Such costs are treated as period costs and are
recognized in the period services are rendered. In 2005,
$509,000 of restructuring charges was reversed, as severance
payments were lower than anticipated.
Income
Taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2006, income taxes of
$40.6 million were recognized on pre-tax income of
$106.2 million, representing an effective tax rate of
38.2 percent, compared to income taxes of
$36.5 million recognized on pre-tax income of
$94.7 million, representing an effective tax rate of
38.5 percent, for 2005, and
32
income taxes of $23.0 million recognized on pre-tax income
of $59.7 million, representing an effective tax rate of
38.5 percent, for 2004.
In addition, we have made investments in various tax credit
funds totaling $6.5 million as of December 31, 2006
and recognized $659,000 of income tax credits earned from
qualified low-income housing investments in 2006. We recognized
an income tax credit of $673,000 for the tax year 2005 from
$6.9 million in such investments. We intend to continue to
make such investments as part of an effort to lower the
effective tax rate and to meet our community reinvestment
obligations under the CRA.
As indicated in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, Note 11 Income Taxes,
income taxes are the sum of two components: current tax
expense and deferred tax expense (benefit). Current tax expense
is the result of applying the current tax rate to taxable
income. The deferred portion is intended to account for the fact
that income on which taxes are paid differs from financial
statement pretax income because certain items of income and
expense are recognized in different years for income tax
purposes than in the financial statements. These differences in
the years that income and expenses are recognized cause
temporary differences.
Most of our temporary differences involve recognizing more
expenses in our financial statements than we have been allowed
to deduct for taxes, and therefore we normally have a net
deferred tax asset. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had
net deferred tax assets of $13.1 million and
$9.7 million, respectively.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Loan
Portfolio
Total gross loans increased by $370.1 million, or
14.8 percent, in 2006. Total gross loans represented
77.0 percent of total assets at December 31, 2006
compared with 73.2 percent and 72.9 percent at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Commercial and industrial loans were $1,726.4 million and
$1,431.5 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, representing 60.2 percent and
57.3 percent, respectively, of the total loan portfolio.
Commercial loans include term loans and revolving lines of
credit. Term loans typically have a maturity of three to five
years and are extended to finance the purchase of business
entities, owner-occupied commercial property, business
equipment, leasehold improvements or for permanent working
capital. SBA guaranteed loans usually have a longer maturity
(five to twenty years). Lines of credit, in general, are
extended on an annual basis to businesses that need temporary
working capital
and/or
import/export financing. These borrowers are well diversified as
to industry, location and their current and target markets. We
manage the portfolio to avoid concentration in any of the areas
mentioned.
Real estate loans were $1,041.4 million and
$974.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, representing 36.3 percent and
39.0 percent, respectively, of the total loan portfolio.
Real estate loans are extended to finance the purchase and/or
improvement of commercial real estate and residential property.
The properties generally are investor-owned, but may be for
user-owned purposes. Underwriting guidelines include, among
other things, an appraisal in conformity with the USPAP,
limitations on
loan-to-value
ratios, and minimum cash flow requirements to service debt. The
majority of the properties taken as collateral are located in
Southern California.
Overall, new loan production increased 7.6 percent in 2006
compared to 2005, as the Banks customer base continued to
expand and collateral values continued to increase, although at
a slower pace than in past years. However, loan portfolio growth
was restricted by a high level of loan payoffs caused by the
flat or inverted yield curve that obtained throughout most of
2005 and 2006. In addition, aggressive pricing of five- to
seven-year fixed-rate commercial real estate loans by certain
competitors eroded the Banks portfolio of commercial real
estate loans tied to the prime rate.
The continued shift in the mix of the loan portfolio in 2005 and
2006 reflects managements intent to emphasize commercial
and industrial lending, while continuing to grow the commercial
real estate portfolio at a prudent pace commensurate with the
Banks rigorous underwriting standards and asset/liability
management and profitability objectives.
33
The following table sets forth the amount of total loans
outstanding in each category as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loans Outstanding as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
757,428
|
|
|
$
|
733,650
|
|
|
$
|
783,539
|
|
|
$
|
397,853
|
|
|
$
|
284,465
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
|
|
152,080
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
43,047
|
|
|
|
39,237
|
|
Residential
Property(1)
|
|
|
81,758
|
|
|
|
88,442
|
|
|
|
80,786
|
|
|
|
58,477
|
|
|
|
47,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
1,041,393
|
|
|
|
974,172
|
|
|
|
956,846
|
|
|
|
499,377
|
|
|
|
371,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
1,202,612
|
|
|
|
945,210
|
|
|
|
754,108
|
|
|
|
433,398
|
|
|
|
346,522
|
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
225,630
|
|
|
|
224,271
|
|
|
|
201,940
|
|
|
|
120,856
|
|
|
|
117,304
|
|
SBA
Loans(2)
|
|
|
171,631
|
|
|
|
155,491
|
|
|
|
166,285
|
|
|
|
91,717
|
|
|
|
66,443
|
|
International Loans
|
|
|
126,561
|
|
|
|
106,520
|
|
|
|
95,936
|
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
|
|
42,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial
Loans
|
|
|
1,726,434
|
|
|
|
1,431,492
|
|
|
|
1,218,269
|
|
|
|
711,011
|
|
|
|
572,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Loans(3)
|
|
|
100,121
|
|
|
|
92,154
|
|
|
|
87,526
|
|
|
|
54,878
|
|
|
|
44,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
$
|
2,867,948
|
|
|
$
|
2,497,818
|
|
|
$
|
2,262,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,265,266
|
|
|
$
|
988,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, loans held for sale
totaling $630,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, were
included at the lower of cost or fair value. |
|
(2) |
|
As of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
loans held for sale totaling $23.2 million, $0,
$3.9 million, $25.5 million and $12.5 million,
respectively, were included at the lower of cost or market. |
|
(3) |
|
Consumer loans includes HELOCs. |
The following table sets forth the percentage distribution of
loans in each category as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Distribution of Loans
|
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
|
28.8
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
|
|
37.8
|
%
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
International Loans
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial
Loans
|
|
|
60.2
|
%
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
53.8
|
%
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
|
|
57.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
The following table shows the distribution of undisbursed loan
commitments as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
$
|
578,347
|
|
|
$
|
555,736
|
|
Commercial Letters of Credit
|
|
|
65,158
|
|
|
|
58,036
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
48,289
|
|
|
|
42,768
|
|
Unused Credit Card Lines
|
|
|
17,031
|
|
|
|
14,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Undisbursed
Loan Commitments
|
|
$
|
708,825
|
|
|
$
|
671,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows the maturity distribution and repricing
intervals of outstanding loans as of December 31, 2006. In
addition, the table shows the distribution of such loans between
those with floating or variable interest rates and those with
fixed or predetermined interest rates. The table includes
non-accrual loans of $14.2 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
But Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
503,372
|
|
|
$
|
143,462
|
|
|
$
|
110,594
|
|
|
$
|
757,428
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
24,816
|
|
|
|
33,546
|
|
|
|
23,396
|
|
|
|
81,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
730,395
|
|
|
|
177,008
|
|
|
|
133,990
|
|
|
|
1,041,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
894,040
|
|
|
|
185,956
|
|
|
|
122,616
|
|
|
|
1,202,612
|
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
225,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,630
|
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
159,395
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
11,364
|
|
|
|
171,631
|
|
International Loans
|
|
|
126,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial
Loans
|
|
|
1,405,626
|
|
|
|
186,828
|
|
|
|
133,980
|
|
|
|
1,726,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
60,725
|
|
|
|
39,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
$
|
2,196,746
|
|
|
$
|
403,232
|
|
|
$
|
267,970
|
|
|
$
|
2,867,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans With Predetermined Interest
Rates
|
|
$
|
69,784
|
|
|
$
|
385,870
|
|
|
$
|
267,970
|
|
|
$
|
723,624
|
|
Loans With Variable Interest Rates
|
|
$
|
2,126,962
|
|
|
$
|
17,362
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,144,324
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, there were $357.0 million of
loans outstanding, or 12.4 percent of total gross loans
outstanding, to borrowers who were involved in the
accommodation/hospitality industry. There was no other
concentration of loans to any one type of industry exceeding ten
percent of total gross loans outstanding.
Non-Performing
Assets
Non-performing assets consist of loans on non-accrual status,
loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest,
loans restructured where the terms of repayment have been
renegotiated resulting in a reduction or deferral of interest or
principal, and other real estate owned (OREO). Loans
are generally placed on non-accrual status when they become
90 days past due unless management believes the loan is
adequately collateralized and in the process of collection.
Loans may be restructured by management when a borrower has
experienced some change in financial status, causing an
inability to meet the original repayment terms, and where we
believe the borrower eventually will overcome those
circumstances and repay the loan in full. OREO consists of
properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means that
management intends to offer for sale.
Managements classification of a loan as non-accrual is an
indication that there is reasonable doubt as to the full
collectibility of principal or interest on the loan; at this
point, we stop recognizing income from the interest on
35
the loan and reverse any uncollected interest that had been
accrued but unpaid. These loans may or may not be
collateralized, but collection efforts are continuously pursued.
Non-performing loans, which made up all non-performing assets,
were $14.2 million at December 31, 2006, compared to
$10.1 million and $6.0 million at December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively, representing a 40.3 percent
increase in 2006 and a 68.5 percent increase in 2005. Total
gross loans increased by 14.8 percent in 2006 over 2005 and
10.4 percent in 2005 over 2004. As a result, the ratio of
non-performing assets to total gross loans increased to
0.50 percent at December 31, 2006 from
0.41 percent at December 31, 2005, and increased to
0.41 percent at December 31, 2005 from
0.27 percent at December 31, 2004. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had no OREO.
Except for non-performing loans set forth below and loans
disclosed as impaired, our management is not aware of any loans
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 for which known credit
problems of the borrower would cause serious doubts as to the
ability of such borrowers to comply with their present loan
repayment terms, or any known events that would result in the
loan being designated as non-performing at some future date. Our
management cannot, however, predict the extent to which a
deterioration in general economic conditions, real estate
values, increases in general rates of interest, or changes in
the financial condition or business of borrower may adversely
affect a borrowers ability to pay.
The following table provides information with respect to the
components of non-performing assets as of December 31 for
the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accrual Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Accrual Loans
|
|
|
14,213
|
|
|
|
10,122
|
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
8,104
|
|
|
|
5,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and
Still Accruing (as to Principal or Interest):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans 90 Days or More Past
Due and Still Accruing (as to Principal or Interest)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Loans
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
10,131
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
|
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
6,475
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing
Assets
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
10,131
|
|
|
$
|
6,014
|
|
|
$
|
8,661
|
|
|
$
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled Debt
Restructurings
|
|
$
|
3,310
|
|
|
$
|
642
|
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
$
|
491
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing Loans as a
Percentage of Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
Non-Performing Assets as a
Percentage of Total Assets
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
36
Allowance
for Loan Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet
Items
Provisions to the allowance for loan losses are made quarterly
to recognize probable loan losses. The quarterly provision is
based on the allowance need, which is calculated using a formula
designed to provide adequate allowances for losses inherent in
the portfolio. The formula is made up of various components. The
allowance is first determined by assigning reserve ratios for
all loans. All loans that are classified are then assigned
certain allocations according to type with larger percentages
applied to loans deemed to be of a higher risk. These
percentages are determined based on the prior loss history by
type of loan, adjusted for current economic factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Allowance for Loan
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Losses Applicable To
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
|
$
|
757,428
|
|
|
$
|
2,043
|
|
|
$
|
733,650
|
|
|
$
|
1,854
|
|
|
$
|
783,539
|
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
397,853
|
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
|
$
|
284,465
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
152,080
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
43,047
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
39,237
|
|
Residential
Property(1)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
81,128
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
87,377
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
80,786
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
58,477
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
47,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
1,040,763
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
973,107
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
956,846
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
499,377
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
371,593
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
Loans(1)
|
|
|
23,099
|
|
|
|
1,703,194
|
|
|
|
21,035
|
|
|
|
1,431,492
|
|
|
|
19,051
|
|
|
|
1,214,419
|
|
|
|
11,376
|
|
|
|
685,557
|
|
|
|
9,773
|
|
|
|
560,370
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
100,121
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
92,154
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
87,526
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
54,878
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
44,416
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
2,844,078
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
2,496,753
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
2,258,791
|
|
|
$
|
13,349
|
|
|
$
|
1,239,812
|
|
|
$
|
11,254
|
|
|
$
|
976,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Loans held for sale excluded. |
The allowance is based on estimates, and ultimate future losses
may vary from current estimates. Underlying trends in the
economic cycle, particularly in Southern California, which
management cannot completely predict, will influence credit
quality. It is always possible that future economic or other
factors may adversely affect Hanmi Banks borrowers. As a
result, we may sustain loan losses in any particular period that
are sizable in relation to the allowance, or exceed the
allowance. In addition, our asset quality may deteriorate
through a number of possible factors, including rapid growth,
failure to maintain or enforce appropriate underwriting
standards, failure to maintain an adequate number of qualified
loan personnel, and failure to identify and monitor potential
problem loans.
The allowance for loan losses and allowance for off-balance
sheet items are maintained at levels that are believed to be
adequate by management to absorb estimated probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowances
is determined through periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio
and other pertinent factors, which are inherently subjective as
the process calls for various significant estimates and
assumptions. Among other factors, the estimates involve the
amounts and timing of expected future cash flows and fair value
of collateral on impaired loans, estimated losses on loans based
on historical loss experience, various qualitative factors, and
uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the
various credit portfolios, which may be subject to substantial
change.
On a quarterly basis, we utilize a classification migration
model and individual loan review analysis tools as starting
points for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items. Our loss
migration analysis tracks twelve quarters of loan losses to
determine historical loss experience in every classification
category (i.e., pass, special mention, substandard and doubtful)
for each loan type, except consumer loans (auto, mortgage and
credit cards), which are analyzed as homogeneous loan pools.
These calculated loss factors are then applied to outstanding
loan balances, unused commitments and off-balance sheet
exposures, such as letters of credit. The individual loan review
analysis is the other part of the allowance allocation process,
applying specific monitoring policies and procedures in
analyzing the existing loan portfolios. Further allowance
assignments are made based on general and specific economic
conditions, as well as performance trends within specific
portfolio segments and individual concentrations of credit.
The allowance for loan losses was $27.6 million at
December 31, 2006, compared to $25.0 million at
December 31, 2005. The increase in the allowance for loan
losses in 2006 was due primarily to increased specific
37
allowances for impaired loans and an increase in the qualitative
adjustments due to changes in the qualitative factors. The ratio
of the allowance for loan losses to total gross loans was
0.96 percent and 1.00 percent at December 31,
2006 and 2005, primarily due to the overall decrease of
historical loss factors on pass grade loans. In addition, the
allowance reflects lower estimated loss severity arising from
better collateral coverage on impaired loans and the presence of
guarantees. The allowance for off-balance sheet items was
$2.1 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
We determine the appropriate overall allowance for loan losses
and allowance for off-balance sheet items based on the analysis
described above, taking into account managements judgment.
The allowance methodology is reviewed on a periodic basis and
modified as appropriate. Based on this analysis, including the
aforementioned factors, we believe that the allowance for loan
losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items are adequate as
of December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan
Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of
Year
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
13,349
|
|
|
$
|
11,254
|
|
|
$
|
9,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan
Losses PUB Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-Offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
3,687
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Charge-Offs
|
|
|
6,129
|
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
5,485
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
3,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries on Loans Previously
Charged Off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recoveries on Loans
Previously Charged Off
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs
|
|
|
4,579
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision Charged to Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
5,310
|
|
|
|
4,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of
Year
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
13,349
|
|
|
$
|
11,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet
Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of
Year
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
Provision Charged to Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of
Year
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to
Average Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to Total
Gross Loans at End of Period
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to
Average Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.05
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total
Gross Loans at End of Period
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
16.62
|
%
|
|
|
11.23
|
%
|
|
|
16.32
|
%
|
|
|
24.08
|
%
|
|
|
23.06
|
%
|
Net Loan Charge-Offs to
Provision Charged to Operating Expenses
|
|
|
63.84
|
%
|
|
|
55.36
|
%
|
|
|
148.68
|
%
|
|
|
60.55
|
%
|
|
|
58.43
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses to
Non-Performing Loans
|
|
|
193.86
|
%
|
|
|
246.40
|
%
|
|
|
377.55
|
%
|
|
|
154.13
|
%
|
|
|
173.81
|
%
|
Balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Total Gross Loans
Outstanding During Period
|
|
$
|
2,751,565
|
|
|
$
|
2,386,575
|
|
|
$
|
1,938,422
|
|
|
$
|
1,119,860
|
|
|
$
|
895,394
|
|
Total Gross Loans Outstanding at
End of Period
|
|
$
|
2,867,948
|
|
|
$
|
2,497,818
|
|
|
$
|
2,262,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,265,266
|
|
|
$
|
988,919
|
|
Non-Performing Loans at End of
Period
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
|
$
|
10,131
|
|
|
$
|
6,014
|
|
|
$
|
8,661
|
|
|
$
|
6,475
|
|
We concentrate the majority of our earning assets in loans. In
all forms of lending, there are inherent risks. We concentrate
the preponderance of our loan portfolio in either commercial
loans or real estate loans. A small part of
38
the portfolio is represented by installment loans primarily for
the purchase of automobiles. While we believe that our
underwriting criteria are prudent, outside factors can adversely
impact credit quality.
A portion of the portfolio is represented by loans guaranteed by
the SBA, which further reduces the potential for loss. We also
utilize credit review in an effort to maintain loan quality.
Loans are reviewed throughout the year with special attention
given to new loans and those that are classified special mention
and below. Loans criticized by this credit review are downgraded
with appropriate allowance added if required.
As indicated above, we formally assess the adequacy of the
allowance on a quarterly basis by:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing the adversely graded, delinquent or otherwise
questionable loans;
|
|
|
|
generating an estimate of the loss potential in each such loan;
|
|
|
|
adjusting a qualitative factor for industry, economic or other
external factors; and
|
|
|
|
evaluating the present status of each loan.
|
Although management believes the allowance is adequate to absorb
probable losses, no assurance can be given that we will not
sustain losses in any given period, which could be substantial
in relation to the size of the allowance.
Investment
Portfolio
As of December 31, 2006, the investment portfolio was
composed primarily of mortgage-backed securities,
U.S. Government agency securities (Agencies),
municipal bonds, collateralized mortgage obligations and
corporate bonds.
Investment securities available for sale were 99.8 percent
of the total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006
and 2005. Most of the securities held by us carried fixed
interest rates. Other than holdings of Agencies, there were no
investments in securities of any one issuer exceeding
10 percent of shareholders equity as of
December 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.
We maintain an investment portfolio primarily for liquidity
purposes. As of December 31, 2006, securities available for
sale were $390.6 million, or 10.5 percent of total
assets, compared to $442.9 million, or 13.0 percent of
total assets, as of December 31, 2005. In 2006 and 2005, we
purchased $9.7 million and $132.7 million,
respectively, of securities, primarily mortgage-backed
securities and Agencies, to replenish the portfolio for
principal repayments in the form of calls, prepayments and
scheduled amortization and to maintain an asset mix consistent
with our strategic direction.
39
The following table summarizes the amortized cost, fair value
and distribution of investment securities as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Portfolio as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities Held to
Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities Held to
Maturity
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
$
|
1,090
|
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available for
Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
123,614
|
|
|
$
|
121,608
|
|
|
$
|
149,311
|
|
|
$
|
147,268
|
|
|
$
|
148,706
|
|
|
$
|
149,174
|
|
U.S. Government Agency
Securities
|
|
|
119,768
|
|
|
|
118,244
|
|
|
|
129,589
|
|
|
|
127,813
|
|
|
|
89,345
|
|
|
|
89,677
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
69,966
|
|
|
|
71,710
|
|
|
|
71,536
|
|
|
|
73,220
|
|
|
|
71,771
|
|
|
|
73,616
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
67,605
|
|
|
|
66,113
|
|
|
|
83,068
|
|
|
|
81,456
|
|
|
|
93,172
|
|
|
|
92,539
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
8,090
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
8,235
|
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
|
|
8,444
|
|
Other Securities
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
5,053
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities Available for
Sale
|
|
$
|
394,042
|
|
|
$
|
390,612
|
|
|
$
|
446,738
|
|
|
$
|
442,863
|
|
|
$
|
415,811
|
|
|
$
|
417,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the maturity
and/or
repricing schedule for investment securities and their
weighted-average yield as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One
|
|
|
After Five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
But Within
|
|
|
But Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Ten Years
|
|
|
Ten Years
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed
Securities(1)
|
|
$
|
43,043
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,845
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
$
|
32,117
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,877
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
U.S. Government Agency
Securities
|
|
|
39,599
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
|
|
78,644
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Bonds(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
|
|
8,669
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
%
|
|
|
61,610
|
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations(1)
|
|
|
18,926
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
41,936
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
5,252
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Securities
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
106,618
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
$
|
171,436
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
46,038
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
67,487
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations have contractual maturities through 2036. The above
table is based on the expected prepayment schedule. |
|
(2) |
|
The yield on municipal bonds has been computed on a
tax-equivalent basis, using an effective marginal rate of
35 percent. |
40
Deposits
Total deposits at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were
$2,944.7 million, $2,826.1 million and
$2,528.8 million, respectively, representing an increase of
$118.6 million, or 4.2 percent, in 2006 and
$297.3 million, or 11.8 percent, in 2005. At
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, total time deposits
outstanding were $1,678.8 million, $1,439.8 million
and $1,031.7 million, respectively, representing
57.0 percent, 50.9 percent and 40.8 percent,
respectively, of total deposits. This growth reflects the shift
away from low-yielding accounts that normally occurs as interest
rates rise and depositors take advantage of the greater interest
rate differentials available in the market.
Demand deposits and money market accounts decreased by
$98.2 million, or 7.8 percent, in 2006 and
$78.5 million, or 5.8 percent, in 2005. Core deposits
(defined as demand, money market and savings deposits) decreased
$120.5 million, or 8.7 percent, to
$1,265.9 million as of December 31, 2006 from
$1,386.4 million as of December 31, 2005, as
depositors shifted funds into higher yielding certificates of
deposit. At December 31, 2006, noninterest-bearing demand
deposits represented 24.7 percent of total deposits
compared to 26.1 percent at December 31, 2005.
Average deposits for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 were $2,881.4 million, $2,632.3 million
and $2,129.7 million, respectively. Average deposits grew
by 9.5 percent in 2006 and 23.6 percent in 2005.
We accept brokered deposits on a selective basis at prudent
interest rates to augment deposit growth. There were
$3.3 million and $7.4 million of brokered deposits as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We also had
$200.0 million of state time deposits over $100,000 with a
weighted-average interest rate of 5.16 percent and
3.87 percent as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The table below summarizes the distribution of average deposits
and the average rates paid for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Demand, Noninterest-Bearing
|
|
$
|
735,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
751,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
665,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
107,811
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
138,167
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
|
131,589
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
Money Market Checking and NOW
Accounts
|
|
|
471,780
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
|
|
539,678
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
466,880
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
1,286,202
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
|
959,904
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
611,555
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
280,249
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
242,996
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
253,884
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
$
|
2,881,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,632,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,129,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes the maturity of time deposits of
$100,000 or more at December 31 of the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Three Months or Less
|
|
$
|
689,309
|
|
|
$
|
587,251
|
|
|
$
|
378,205
|
|
Over Three Months Through Six
Months
|
|
|
414,687
|
|
|
|
248,338
|
|
|
|
232,231
|
|
Over Six Months Through Twelve
Months
|
|
|
274,402
|
|
|
|
321,714
|
|
|
|
131,775
|
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
14,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,383,358
|
|
|
$
|
1,161,950
|
|
|
$
|
756,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
FHLB
Advances and Other Borrowings
FHLB advances and other borrowings mostly take the form of
advances from the FHLB of San Francisco and overnight
Federal funds.
At December 31, 2006, advances from the FHLB were
$168.1 million, an increase of $124.6 million, or
286.2 percent, from the December 31, 2005 balance of
$43.5 million. During 2006, the Bank borrowed
$130.0 million from the FHLB for terms of 12 to
24 months to allow it to fund fixed-rate loans, but
maintain the desired level of asset sensitivity.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures
During the first half of 2004, we issued two junior subordinated
notes bearing interest at the three-month London InterBank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.90 percent totaling
$61.8 million and one junior subordinated note bearing
interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.63 percent
totaling $20.6 million. The outstanding subordinated
debentures related to these offerings, the proceeds of which
were used to finance the purchase of PUB, totaled
$82.4 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
INTEREST
RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk indicates our exposure to market interest
rate fluctuations. The movement of interest rates directly and
inversely affects the economic value of fixed-income assets,
which is the present value of future cash flow discounted by the
current interest rate; under the same conditions, the higher the
current interest rate, the higher the denominator of
discounting. Interest rate risk management is intended to
decrease or increase the level of our exposure to market
interest rates. The level of interest rate risk can be managed
through such means as the changing of gap positions and the
volume of fixed-income assets. For successful management of
interest rate risk, we use various methods to measure existing
and future interest rate risk exposures, giving effect to
historical attrition rates of core deposits. In addition to
regular reports used in business operations, repricing gap
analysis, stress testing and simulation modeling are the main
measurement techniques used to quantify interest rate risk
exposure.
The following table shows the status of our gap position as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
After One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Year But
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
But Within
|
|
|
Five
|
|
|
Five
|
|
|
Interest-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Sensitive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,501
|
|
|
$
|
97,501
|
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal
Home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,922
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
|
55,309
|
|
|
|
171,437
|
|
|
|
113,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,176
|
|
Floating Rate
|
|
|
9,850
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
26,178
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,403
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
41,199
|
|
|
|
45,894
|
|
|
|
385,868
|
|
|
|
267,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,930
|
|
Floating Rate
|
|
|
1,884,321
|
|
|
|
20,798
|
|
|
|
204,027
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,112,805
|
|
Non-Accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,213
|
|
|
|
14,213
|
|
Deferred Loan Fees and
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,558
|
)
|
|
|
(30,558
|
)
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
297,744
|
|
|
|
327,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,988,276
|
|
|
$
|
148,918
|
|
|
$
|
787,510
|
|
|
$
|
421,639
|
|
|
$
|
378,900
|
|
|
$
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
After One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Year But
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
But Within
|
|
|
Five
|
|
|
Five
|
|
|
Interest-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Sensitive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand Deposits
|
|
$
|
43,944
|
|
|
$
|
147,184
|
|
|
$
|
353,240
|
|
|
$
|
183,979
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
728,347
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
13,027
|
|
|
|
31,258
|
|
|
|
44,375
|
|
|
|
10,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,255
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW
Accounts
|
|
|
65,322
|
|
|
|
125,238
|
|
|
|
142,165
|
|
|
|
105,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,267
|
|
Time Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
812,061
|
|
|
|
855,730
|
|
|
|
10,768
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678,700
|
|
Floating Rate
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
118,252
|
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,037
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,968
|
|
|
|
41,968
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
1,017,835
|
|
|
$
|
1,204,410
|
|
|
$
|
668,800
|
|
|
$
|
305,113
|
|
|
$
|
529,085
|
|
|
$
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repricing Gap
|
|
$
|
970,441
|
|
|
$
|
(1,055,492
|
)
|
|
$
|
118,710
|
|
|
$
|
116,526
|
|
|
$
|
(150,185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap
|
|
$
|
970,441
|
|
|
$
|
(85,051
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,659
|
|
|
$
|
150,185
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap as a
Percentage of Total Assets
|
|
|
26.05
|
%
|
|
|
(2.28
|
)%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap as a
Percentage of Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
29.26
|
%
|
|
|
(2.56
|
)%
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The repricing gap analysis measures the static timing of
repricing risk of assets and liabilities (i.e., a
point-in-time
analysis measuring the difference between assets maturing or
repricing in a period and liabilities maturing or repricing
within the same time period). Assets are assigned to maturity
and repricing categories based on their expected repayment or
repricing dates, and liabilities are assigned based on their
repricing or maturity dates. Core deposits that have no maturity
dates (demand deposits, savings, money market checking and NOW
accounts) are assigned to categories based on expected decay
rates.
On December 31, 2006, the cumulative repricing gap as a
percentage of interest-earning assets in the
less-than-three
month period was 29.26 percent. This decrease from the
previous years figure of 32.25 percent was caused
primarily by a shift in the mix of the loan portfolio into
fixed-rate loans, which increased $324.3 million, or
77.8 percent, partially offset by a decrease of
$45.7 million, or 11.6 percent, in fixed-rate
investments, funded primarily by certificates of deposit, as the
mix of the deposits portfolio shifted away from core deposits
and the balance of loans linked to the prime rate increased only
$42.2 million, or 2.0 percent. The cumulative
repricing percentage in the less than twelve month period also
moved lower, reaching (2.56) percent. This was a decrease from
the previous years figure of 3.13 percent. The
decrease was caused by an increase of $394.5 million in
fixed-rate time deposits maturing within one year, offset by a
decrease of $148.8 million in floating rate time deposits
maturing within one year. In terms of fixed and floating gap
positions, which are used internally to control repricing risk,
the accumulated fixed gap position between assets and
liabilities as a percentage of interest-earning assets was 5.09
percent asset-sensitive, compared to 10.30 percent and 20.01
percent as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
floating gap position in the less than twelve months period was
0.54 percent liability-sensitive, compared to 7.00 percent
and 19.30 percent asset-sensitive as of December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
43
The following table summarizes the status of the cumulative gap
position as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than Three Months
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cumulative Repricing Gap
|
|
$
|
970,441
|
|
|
$
|
972,608
|
|
|
$
|
(85,051
|
)
|
|
$
|
94,299
|
|
Percentage of Total Assets
|
|
|
26.05
|
%
|
|
|
28.49
|
%
|
|
|
(2.28
|
)%
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
Percentage of Interest-Earning
Assets
|
|
|
29.26
|
%
|
|
|
32.25
|
%
|
|
|
(2.56
|
)%
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
The spread between interest income on interest-earning assets
and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities is the
principal component of net interest income, and interest rate
changes substantially affect our financial performance. We
emphasize capital protection through stable earnings rather than
maximizing yield. In order to achieve stable earnings, we
prudently manage our assets and liabilities and closely monitor
the percentage changes in net interest income and equity value
in relation to limits established within our guidelines.
To supplement traditional gap analysis, we perform simulation
modeling to estimate the potential effects of interest rate
changes. The following table summarizes one of the stress
simulations performed to forecast the impact of changing
interest rates on net interest income and the market value of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
reflected on our balance sheet (i.e., an instantaneous parallel
shift in the yield curve of the magnitude indicated). This
sensitivity analysis is compared to policy limits, which specify
the maximum tolerance level for net interest income exposure
over a one-year horizon, given the basis point adjustment in
interest rates reflected below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Shock Table
|
|
|
|
Percentage Changes
|
|
|
Change in Amount
|
|
Change in
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
Interest
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
Rate
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
200%
|
|
|
13.07
|
%
|
|
|
(9.80
|
)%
|
|
$
|
20,632
|
|
|
$
|
(47,657
|
)
|
100%
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
|
|
(5.14
|
)%
|
|
$
|
10,287
|
|
|
$
|
(24,886
|
)
|
(100%)
|
|
|
(6.55
|
)%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
(10,337
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,845
|
|
(200%)
|
|
|
(13.15
|
)%
|
|
|
11.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
(20,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
55,089
|
|
The estimated sensitivity does not necessarily represent our
forecast and the results may not be indicative of actual changes
to our net interest income. These estimates are based upon a
number of assumptions including: the nature and timing of
interest rate levels including yield curve shape, prepayments on
loans and securities, pricing strategies on loans and deposits,
and replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While the
assumptions used are based on current economic and local market
conditions, there is no assurance as to the predictive nature of
these conditions, including how customer preferences or
competitor influences might change.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity of the Bank is defined as the ability to supply cash
as quickly as needed without causing a severe deterioration in
profitability. The Banks liquidity consists primarily of
available cash positions, Federal funds sold and short-term
investments categorized as available for sale securities, which
can be disposed of without significant capital losses in the
ordinary course of business, plus borrowing capacities, which
include Federal funds lines, repurchase agreements and FHLB
advances. Therefore, maintenance of high quality loans and
securities that can be used for collateral in repurchase
agreements or other secured borrowings is important feature of
our liquidity management.
The maintenance of a proper level of liquid assets is critical
for both the liquidity and the profitability of the Bank. Since
the primary purpose of the investment portfolio is to ensure the
Bank has adequate liquidity, management maintains appropriate
levels of liquid assets to avoid exposure to higher than
necessary liquidity risk. Liquidity risk may increase when the
Bank has few short-duration securities available for sale
and/or is
not capable of raising funds as quickly as necessary at
acceptable rates in the capital or money markets. A heavy and
sudden increase in cash demands for loans
and/or
deposits can tighten the liquidity position. Several ratios are
44
reviewed on a daily, monthly and quarterly basis to manage the
liquidity position and to preempt any liquidity crisis. Specific
statistics, which include the
loans-to-assets
ratio, off-balance sheet items and dependence on non-core
deposits, foreign deposits, lines of credit and liquid assets,
are reviewed regularly for liquidity management purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Liquidity Ratios
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Core Deposits/Total Assets
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
Short-Term Non-Core Funding/Total
Assets
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.8
|
%
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
Net Loans/Total Assets
|
|
|
76.6
|
%
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
|
|
71.9
|
%
|
Investments/Deposits
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
Loans and Investments/Deposits
|
|
|
112.2
|
%
|
|
|
106.3
|
%
|
|
|
108.5
|
%
|
Off-Balance Sheet Items/Total
Assets
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
The net loans to total assets ratio increased to
76.6 percent as of December 31, 2006, compared to
72.4 percent at December 31, 2005. The ratio of loans
and investments to deposits increased to 112.2 percent as
the Bank made use of borrowings with maturities of one to two
years to fund a portion of loan portfolio growth. Off-balance
sheet items as a percentage of total assets increased at
December 31, 2006 to 19.2 percent, compared to
18.5 percent at December 31, 2005, and the total
amount increased to $708.8 million at December 31,
2006 from $671.4 million at December 31, 2005. The
increase was primarily due to a $21.5 million increase in
commitments to extend credit. During the year, the percentage of
off-balance sheet items to total assets generally ranged from
18 percent to 20 percent. The ratio of short-term
non-core funding to total assets was 46.0 percent at
December 31, 2006, compared to 41.8 percent at
December 31, 2005.
Foreign deposits are
U.S.-based
deposits made by foreign customers. Foreign deposit risk deals
with dependency on foreign deposits that could adversely affect
the Banks liquidity. These liabilities are assumed to be
volatile because of the variability of social, political and
environmental conditions in foreign countries. As of
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, foreign deposits deposits
were $325.4 million, $294.3 million and
297.4 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, we maintained a total of
$158.0 million in credit lines secured by us to meet our
liquidity needs. In addition, we maintained eight master
repurchase agreements, all of which can furnish liquidity to us
in consideration of bond collateral. We also can meet our
liquidity needs through borrowings from the FHLB. We are
eligible to borrow up of 25 percent of our total assets
from the FHLB.
As of December 31, 2006, there were no material commitments
for capital expenditures. We raise capital in the form of
deposits, borrowings (primarily FHLB advances and junior
subordinated debentures) and equity, and expect to continue to
rely upon deposits as the primary source of capital.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
For a discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements, see
Item 1. Business Small Business
Administration Guaranteed Loans and
Item 1. Business Off-Balance Sheet
Commitments.
45
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Less
|
|
|
and Less
|
|
|
More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
Than Three
|
|
|
Than Five
|
|
|
Than Five
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Time Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,667,937
|
|
|
$
|
4,972
|
|
|
$
|
5,796
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
1,678,846
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
|
578,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578,347
|
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
111,000
|
|
|
|
7,252
|
|
|
|
87,262
|
|
|
|
250,514
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
47,709
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
48,289
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
5,917
|
|
|
|
3,443
|
|
|
|
6,068
|
|
|
|
19,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual
Obligations
|
|
$
|
2,343,086
|
|
|
$
|
122,201
|
|
|
$
|
16,491
|
|
|
$
|
93,739
|
|
|
$
|
2,575,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects
of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements.
SAB No. 108 specifies how the carryover or
reversal of prior year unrecorded financial statement
misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year
misstatement. SAB No. 108 requires an approach that
considers the amount by which the current year Consolidated
Statement of Income is misstated (rollover approach)
and an approach that considers the cumulative amount by which
the current year Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
is misstated (iron curtain approach). Prior to the
issuance of SAB No. 108, either the rollover or iron
curtain approach was acceptable for assessing the materiality of
financial statement misstatements.
Initial application of SAB No. 108 allows registrants
to elect not to restate prior periods but to reflect the initial
application in their annual financial statements covering the
first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The
cumulative effect of the initial application should be reported
in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as of the
beginning of that fiscal year and the offsetting adjustment, net
of tax, should be made to the opening balance of retained
earnings for that year. Registrants are required to disclose the
nature and amount of each item, when and how each error being
corrected arose, and the fact that the errors were previously
considered immaterial.
We adopted the provisions of SAB No. 108 effective as
of January 1, 2006. In the fourth quarter of 2006, as part
of managements review of the operating results of tax
credit partnership investments, we determined that our share of
losses from certain of these investments had not been properly
recorded, due to oversight, in accordance with GAAP for the
years 2003 to 2005. In accordance with the transition provisions
of SAB No. 108, we recorded a net $656,000 cumulative
adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2006.
We have concluded that these adjustments are immaterial to prior
years consolidated financial statements under our previous
method of assessing materiality, and therefore have elected, as
permitted under the transition provisions of
SAB No. 108, to reflect the effect of these
adjustments in opening assets and liabilities as of
January 1, 2006, with the offsetting adjustment reflected
as a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings
as of January 1, 2006.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within that fiscal year. We are currently assessing the impact
that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our
financial condition and results of operations.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN No. 48). FIN No. 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We will
be required to
46
adopt FIN No. 48 in the first quarter of 2007. We do
not expect the adoption of FIN No. 48 will have a
material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,
which amends the guidance in SFAS No. 140. SFAS
No. 156 requires that an entity separately recognize a
servicing asset or a servicing liability when it undertakes an
obligation to service a financial asset under a servicing
contract in certain situations. Such servicing assets or
servicing labilities are required to be measured initially at
fair value, if practicable. SFAS No. 156 also allows an
entity to measure its servicing assets and servicing liabilities
subsequently using either the amortization method, which existed
under SFAS No. 140, or the fair value measurement method.
SFAS No. 156 will be effective in the fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of
SFAS No. 156 to have a material impact on our
financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and
SFAS No. 140. This Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial
instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise
would require bifurcation;
|
|
|
|
clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips
are not subject to SFAS No. 133;
|
|
|
|
establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized
financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding
derivatives or hybrid financial instruments that contain an
embedded derivative requiring bifurcation;
|
|
|
|
clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of
subordinations are not embedded derivatives; and
|
|
|
|
amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a
qualified special purpose entity from holding a derivative
financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest
other than another derivative financial instrument.
|
SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial
instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an
entitys first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006. We are currently assessing the impact
that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have on our
financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market
risks in Hanmi Banks portfolio, see Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Interest Rate Risk
Management and Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The financial statements required to be filed as a part of this
Report are set forth on pages 52 through 91.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2006, Hanmi Financial carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
Hanmi Financials management, including Hanmi
Financials Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
Hanmi Financials disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that:
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financials disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report in
timely alerting them to material information relating to Hanmi
Financial that is required to be included in Hanmi
Financials periodic SEC filings; and
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financials internal controls over financial
reporting provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.
|
During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, there have been
no significant changes in Hanmi Financials internal
controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could
significantly affect these controls subsequent to the evaluation
date.
Disclosure controls and procedures are defined in SEC rules as
controls and other procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Hanmi
Financials disclosure controls and procedures were
designed to ensure that material information related to Hanmi
Financial, including subsidiaries, is made known to management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, in a timely manner.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of Hanmi Financial Corporation (Hanmi
Financial) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Hanmi Financials internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of consolidated financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial
reporting includes those written policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of Hanmi Financials
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006. Management based this assessment on
criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting
described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Managements assessment included an evaluation
of the design of Hanmi Financials internal control over
financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting. Management
reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee
of our Board of Directors.
Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of
December 31, 2006, Hanmi Financial maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that
audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements of
Hanmi Financial, has issued a report on managements
assessment of Hanmi Financials internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. The report
expresses unqualified opinions on managements assessment
and on the effectiveness of Hanmi Financials internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.
48
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hanmi Financial Corporation:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting included in Item 9A, that Hanmi
Financial Corporation and subsidiary (the Company) maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated statements of financial condition of Hanmi
Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated
March 1, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 1, 2007
49
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Except as hereinafter noted, the information concerning
directors and officers of Hanmi Financial is incorporated by
reference from the sections entitled The Board of
Directors and Executive Officers and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance of Hanmi Financials Definitive Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be
filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close
of Hanmi Financials fiscal year.
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
M. Christian Mitchell was appointed to the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors as of April 11, 2004. The Board
has determined that Mr. Mitchell meets the independence
standards required by NASDAQ and is a financial
expert within the meaning of the current rules of the SEC.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial
and accounting officer, controller and other persons performing
similar functions. It will be provided to any stockholder
without charge, upon the written request of that stockholder.
Such requests should be addressed to Justine Roe, General
Counsel, Hanmi Financial Corporation, 3660 Wilshire Boulevard,
Penthouse Suite A, Los Angeles, California 90010. It is
also available on our website at www.hanmi.com.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated by
reference from the section entitled Executive
Compensation of Hanmi Financials Definitive
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which
will be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the
close of Hanmi Financials fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management and related stockholder matters will
appear under the caption Beneficial Ownership of
Principal Stockholders and Management in Hanmi
Financials Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information concerning certain relationships and related
transactions is incorporated by reference from the section
entitled Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of Hanmi Financials Definitive
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which
will be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the
close of Hanmi Financials fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information concerning Hanmi Financials principal
accountants fees and services is incorporated by reference
from the section entitled Independent Accountants
of Hanmi Financials Definitive Proxy Statement for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the
Commission within 120 days after the close of Hanmi
Financials fiscal year.
50
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
(1) The Financial Statements required to be filed hereunder
are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on
page 52 of this Report.
(2) All Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted as
the required information is inapplicable or has been included in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) The Exhibits required to be filed with this Report are
listed in the Exhibit Index included herein at page 93.
51
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
52
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hanmi Financial Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial condition of Hanmi Financial Corporation and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Hanmi Financial Corporations
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Hanmi Financial Corporation and subsidiary as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Hanmi Financial Corporations internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated March 1, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of,
internal control over financial reporting.
As discussed in Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R, Share-Based Payment.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 1, 2007
53
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and Due From Banks
|
|
$
|
97,501
|
|
|
$
|
103,477
|
|
Federal Funds Sold and Securities
Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
138,501
|
|
|
|
163,477
|
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held to Maturity, at
Amortized Cost (Fair Value: 2006 $969;
2005 $1,051)
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Securities Available for Sale, at
Fair Value
|
|
|
390,612
|
|
|
|
442,863
|
|
Loans Receivable, Net of Allowance
for Loan Losses of $27,557 and $24,963 at December 31, 2006
and 2005, Respectively
|
|
|
2,813,520
|
|
|
|
2,468,015
|
|
Loans Held for Sale, at the Lower
of Cost or Fair Value
|
|
|
23,870
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
Customers Liability on
Acceptances
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
Premises and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
20,075
|
|
|
|
20,784
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
16,919
|
|
|
|
14,120
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
13,064
|
|
|
|
9,651
|
|
Servicing Asset
|
|
|
4,579
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
207,646
|
|
|
|
209,058
|
|
Core Deposit Intangible
|
|
|
6,312
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
12,237
|
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
|
|
|
23,592
|
|
|
|
22,713
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
27,261
|
|
|
|
15,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
$
|
3,414,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing
|
|
$
|
728,347
|
|
|
$
|
738,618
|
|
Interest-Bearing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
99,255
|
|
|
|
121,574
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW
Accounts
|
|
|
438,267
|
|
|
|
526,171
|
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
1,383,358
|
|
|
|
1,161,950
|
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
295,488
|
|
|
|
277,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
2,944,715
|
|
|
|
2,826,114
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
|
|
11,911
|
|
Acceptances Outstanding
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
169,037
|
|
|
|
46,331
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
|
|
12,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
3,238,126
|
|
|
|
2,987,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(Notes 18 and 19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value;
Authorized 200,000,000 Shares; Issued
50,239,613 Shares (49,076,613 Shares Outstanding)
and 49,821,798 Shares
(48,658,798 Shares Outstanding) at December 31,
2006 and 2005, Respectively
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
344,810
|
|
|
|
339,991
|
|
Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss Unrealized Loss on Securities Available for
Sale, Interest-Only Strips and Interest Rate Swaps, Net of
Income Taxes of ($1,450) and ($1,671) at December 31, 2006
and 2005, Respectively
|
|
|
(3,200
|
)
|
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
165,498
|
|
|
|
112,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,158
|
|
|
|
446,818
|
|
Less Treasury Stock, at Cost;
1,163,000 Shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
426,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
3,725,243
|
|
|
$
|
3,414,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
54
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Fees on Loans
|
|
$
|
239,075
|
|
|
$
|
180,845
|
|
|
$
|
117,999
|
|
Interest on Investments
|
|
|
19,710
|
|
|
|
18,507
|
|
|
|
17,372
|
|
Interest on Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Interest on Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income
|
|
|
260,189
|
|
|
|
200,941
|
|
|
|
135,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Deposits
|
|
|
93,036
|
|
|
|
54,192
|
|
|
|
26,268
|
|
Interest on FHLB Advances and
Other Borrowings
|
|
|
6,977
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
Interest on Junior Subordinated
Debentures
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
3,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
106,429
|
|
|
|
62,111
|
|
|
|
32,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
|
|
153,760
|
|
|
|
138,830
|
|
|
|
102,937
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
|
|
|
146,587
|
|
|
|
133,435
|
|
|
|
100,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
|
|
17,134
|
|
|
|
15,782
|
|
|
|
14,441
|
|
Trade Finance Fees
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
Remittance Fees
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
Other Service Charges and Fees
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance Income
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Increase in Fair Value of
Derivatives
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
Gain on Sales of Loans
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
Gain on Sales of Securities
Available for Sale
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
35,604
|
|
|
|
30,382
|
|
|
|
26,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
40,512
|
|
|
|
36,839
|
|
|
|
33,540
|
|
Occupancy and Equipment
|
|
|
10,130
|
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
Data Processing
|
|
|
4,939
|
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
Advertising and Promotion
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
3,001
|
|
Supplies and Communications
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
Professional Fees
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
Amortization of Core Deposit
Intangible
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded
Options
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Expenses
|
|
|
10,114
|
|
|
|
7,778
|
|
|
|
8,961
|
|
Merger-Related Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
75,954
|
|
|
|
69,133
|
|
|
|
66,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME
TAXES
|
|
|
106,237
|
|
|
|
94,684
|
|
|
|
59,675
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
40,588
|
|
|
|
36,455
|
|
|
|
22,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
48,850,221
|
|
|
|
49,174,885
|
|
|
|
42,268,964
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
49,435,128
|
|
|
|
49,942,356
|
|
|
|
43,517,257
|
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stock,
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
at Cost
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
BALANCE
JANUARY 1, 2004
|
|
|
28,326,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,326,820
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
103,068
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
35,985
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,467
|
|
Exercises of Stock Options and
Stock Warrants
|
|
|
690,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690,576
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
Stock Issued Through Private
Placement
|
|
|
7,894,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,894,654
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
71,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,710
|
|
Stock Issued in PUB Acquisition
|
|
|
12,418,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,418,654
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
156,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,750
|
|
Cash Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,791
|
)
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,700
|
|
Change in Unrealized Gain on
Securities Available for Sale, Interest-Only Strips and Interest
Rate Swaps, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
DECEMBER 31, 2004
|
|
|
49,330,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,330,704
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
334,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
63,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,910
|
|
Exercises of Stock Options
|
|
|
391,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,094
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
Restricted Stock Award
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
(1,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
Stock Repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
Cash Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,229
|
|
Change in Unrealized Gain on
Securities Available for Sale, Interest-Only Strips and Interest
Rate Swaps, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
DECEMBER 31, 2005
|
|
|
49,821,798
|
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
48,658,798
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
339,991
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
|
112,310
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
426,777
|
|
Cumulative Adjustment
Tax Credit Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
Cumulative Adjustment
Share-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(916
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Exercises of Stock Options and
Stock Warrants
|
|
|
417,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
Cash Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,649
|
|
Change in Unrealized Gain on
Securities Available for Sale, Interest-Only Strips and Interest
Rate Swaps, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
DECEMBER 31, 2006
|
|
|
50,239,613
|
|
|
|
(1,163,000
|
)
|
|
|
49,076,613
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
344,810
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,200
|
)
|
|
$
|
165,498
|
|
|
$
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
56
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income
to Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization of
Premises and Equipment
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
Amortization of Premiums and
Accretion of Discounts on Investments, Net
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
Amortization of Core Deposit
Intangible
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock Dividends
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
Gain on Sales of Securities
Available for Sale
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
Increase in Fair Value of
Derivatives
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Decrease in Fair Value of Embedded
Options
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sales of Loans
|
|
|
(6,917
|
)
|
|
|
(3,021
|
)
|
|
|
(2,997
|
)
|
Loss on Sales of Premises and
Equipment
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Exercises
of Stock Options
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax (Benefit) Expense
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
(2,707
|
)
|
|
|
694
|
|
Origination of Loans Held for Sale
|
|
|
(154,608
|
)
|
|
|
(61,709
|
)
|
|
|
(53,855
|
)
|
Proceeds from Sales of Loans Held
for Sale
|
|
|
138,720
|
|
|
|
67,515
|
|
|
|
54,311
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in Accrued
Interest Receivable
|
|
|
(2,799
|
)
|
|
|
(4,091
|
)
|
|
|
155
|
|
Increase in Servicing Asset
|
|
|
(669
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
Increase in Cash Surrender Value of
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in Other Assets
|
|
|
(11,424
|
)
|
|
|
(2,015
|
)
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Accrued
Interest Payable
|
|
|
10,671
|
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in Other
Liabilities
|
|
|
(1,298
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(11,285
|
)
|
Other, Net
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating
Activities
|
|
|
48,909
|
|
|
|
68,944
|
|
|
|
37,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Redemption of Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Sales of Federal Home
Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,031
|
|
Proceeds from Matured or Called
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
56,729
|
|
|
|
89,885
|
|
|
|
120,389
|
|
Proceeds from Matured or Called
Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Proceeds from Sales of Securities
Available for Sale
|
|
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
11,360
|
|
|
|
53,063
|
|
Net Increase in Loans Receivable
|
|
|
(352,678
|
)
|
|
|
(242,088
|
)
|
|
|
(120,651
|
)
|
Purchase of Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank
and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
(2,264
|
)
|
|
|
(9,884
|
)
|
Purchases of Securities Available
for Sale
|
|
|
(9,663
|
)
|
|
|
(132,700
|
)
|
|
|
(22,384
|
)
|
Purchases of Bank-Owned Life
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
Purchases of Premises and Equipment
|
|
|
(2,237
|
)
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
|
|
(2,049
|
)
|
Acquisition of Pacific Union Bank,
Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing
Activities
|
|
|
(307,538
|
)
|
|
|
(279,638
|
)
|
|
|
(49,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Deposits
|
|
|
118,601
|
|
|
|
297,307
|
|
|
|
146,273
|
|
Issuance of Junior Subordinated
Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
Proceeds from Exercises of Stock
Options and Stock Warrants
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Exercises
of Stock Options
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Issued Through Private
Placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,710
|
|
Cash Dividends Paid
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
|
|
(7,740
|
)
|
Cash Paid to Acquire Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Long-Term FHLB
Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
7,411
|
|
|
|
66,363
|
|
Repayment of Long-Term FHLB
Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
(5,420
|
)
|
|
|
(30,246
|
)
|
|
|
(148,400
|
)
|
Net Change in Short-Term FHLB
Advances and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(137,458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Financing
Activities
|
|
|
233,653
|
|
|
|
247,007
|
|
|
|
76,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(24,976
|
)
|
|
|
36,313
|
|
|
|
64,569
|
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents Beginning of Year
|
|
|
163,477
|
|
|
|
127,164
|
|
|
|
62,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
|
$
|
163,477
|
|
|
$
|
127,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash
Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$
|
117,100
|
|
|
$
|
41,266
|
|
|
$
|
29,920
|
|
Income Taxes Paid
|
|
$
|
45,869
|
|
|
$
|
37,650
|
|
|
$
|
25,400
|
|
Supplemental Schedule of
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of Loans to Other Real
Estate Owned
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued Dividend
|
|
$
|
2,941
|
|
|
$
|
2,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,467
|
|
Reconciliation of Acquisition of
Pacific Union Bank, Net of Cash Acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Assets Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,383,782
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,383
|
)
|
Non-Cash Financing of Purchase
Price and Liabilities Assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156,750
|
)
|
Liabilities Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,059,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Pacific Union
Bank, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
57
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
NOTE 1
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The accounting and reporting policies of Hanmi Financial
Corporation and subsidiary conform to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. A summary of
the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the
preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial
statements follows.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Hanmi Financial Corporation (Hanmi Financial,
we or us) and our wholly owned
subsidiary, Hanmi Bank (the Bank), after elimination
of all material intercompany transactions and balances.
Hanmi Financial was formed as a holding company of the Bank and
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933 on March 17, 2001. Subsequent to its
formation, each of the Banks shares was exchanged for one
share of Hanmi Financial with an equal value.
Our primary operations are related to traditional banking
activities, including the acceptance of deposits and the lending
and investing of money through operation of the Bank. The Bank
is a community bank conducting general business banking with its
primary market encompassing the multi-ethnic population of Los
Angeles, Orange, San Diego, San Francisco and
Santa Clara counties. The Banks full-service offices
are located in business areas where many of the businesses are
run by immigrants and other minority groups. The Banks
client base reflects the multi-ethnic composition of these
communities. The Bank is a California state-chartered,
FDIC-insured financial institution.
On April 30, 2004, we completed our acquisition of Pacific
Union Bank (PUB), a $1.2 billion (assets)
commercial bank headquartered in Los Angeles that also served
primarily the
Korean-American
community. As of December 31, 2006, the Bank maintained a
branch network of 22 locations, serving individuals and small-
to medium-sized businesses in Los Angeles and surrounding areas.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks,
overnight Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
resale agreements, all of which have original or purchased
maturities of less than 90 days.
Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
As a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
(FRB), the Bank is required to maintain stock in the
FRB based on a specified ratio relative to our capital. FRB
stock is carried at cost and may be sold back to the FRB at its
carrying value. Both cash and stock dividends received are
reported as dividend income.
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco (FHLB), the Bank is required to
own common stock in the FHLB based upon our balance of
residential mortgage loans and outstanding FHLB advances. FHLB
stock is carried at cost and may be sold back to the FHLB at its
carrying value. Both cash and stock dividends received are
reported as dividend income.
58
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Securities
Securities are classified into three categories and accounted
for as follows:
1. Securities that we have the positive intent and ability
to hold to maturity are classified as
held-to-maturity
and reported at amortized cost;
2. Securities that are bought and held principally for the
purpose of selling them in the near future are classified as
trading securities and reported at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in earnings; and
3. Securities not classified as
held-to-maturity
or trading securities are classified as available for
sale and reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and
losses are reported as a separate component of
shareholders equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income, Net of Income Taxes.
Accreted discounts and amortized premiums on investment
securities are included in interest income using the effective
interest method over the remaining period to the call date or
contractual maturity and, in the case of mortgage-backed
securities and securities with call features, adjusted for
anticipated prepayments. Unrealized and realized gains or losses
related to holding or selling of securities are calculated using
the specific-identification method.
We assess, at each reporting date, whether there is an
other-than-temporary
impairment to our investment securities. We examine all
individual securities that are in an unrealized loss position at
each reporting date for
other-than-temporary
impairment. Specific investment level factors we examine to
assess impairment include the severity and duration of the loss,
an analysis of the issuers of the securities and if there has
been any cause for default on the securities and any change in
the rating of the securities by the various rating agencies.
Additionally, we reexamine the financial resources and overall
ability the Bank has and the intent management has to hold the
securities until their fair values recover. To the extent there
is an impairment of value deemed other than
temporary for a security held to maturity or available for
sale, a loss is recognized in earnings and a new cost basis
established for the security.
We also have a minority investment of 4.99 percent in a
non-publicly traded company, Pacific International Bank. The
investment is included in Other Assets on the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition and is carried at cost. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, its carrying value was
$511,000. We monitor the investment for impairment and make
appropriate reductions in carrying value when necessary.
Derivative
Instruments
We account for derivatives in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, as amended. Under
SFAS No. 133, all derivatives are recognized on the
balance sheet at their fair values. On the date the derivative
contract is entered into, we designate the derivative as a fair
value hedge or a cash flow hedge. Fair value hedges include
hedges of the fair value of a recognized asset, liability or a
firm commitment. Cash flow hedges include hedges of the
variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a
recognized asset, liability or a forecasted transaction. Changes
in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value
hedges, along with the change in fair value on the hedged asset,
liability or firm commitment that is attributable to the hedged
risk, are recorded in current period earnings. Changes in the
fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, to the
extent effective as a hedge, are recorded in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income and reclassified into earnings in the
period during which the hedged item affects earnings.
We formally document all relationships between hedging
instruments and hedged items. This documentation includes our
risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various
hedge transactions, as well as how
59
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
hedge effectiveness and ineffectiveness will be measured. This
process includes linking derivatives to specific assets and
liabilities on the balance sheet. We also formally assess, both
at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether
the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly
effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of
hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is not
highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly
effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined
that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge,
the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet
at its fair value, with changes in its fair value recognized in
current period earnings. For fair value hedges, the formerly
hedged asset or liability will no longer be adjusted for changes
in fair value and any previously recorded adjustments to the
carrying value of the hedged asset or liability will be
amortized in the same manner that the hedged item affects
income. For cash flow hedges, amounts previously recorded in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income will be reclassified into
income as earnings are impacted by the variability in the cash
flows of the hedged item.
If the hedging instrument is terminated early, the derivative is
removed from the balance sheet. Accounting for the adjustments
to the hedged asset or liability or adjustments to Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income are the same as described above when
a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge.
If the hedged asset or liability is sold or extinguished, the
derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at
its fair value, with changes in its fair value recognized in
current period earnings. The hedged item, including previously
recorded
mark-to-market
adjustments, is derecognized immediately as a component of the
gain or loss upon disposition.
Loans
We originate loans for investment, with such designation made at
the time of origination. Loans are recorded at the contractual
amounts due from borrowers, adjusted for undisbursed funds, net
deferred loan fees and origination costs, and the allowance for
loan losses.
Certain Small Business Administration (SBA) loans
that may be sold prior to maturity have been designated as held
for sale at origination and are recorded at the lower of cost or
fair value, determined on an aggregate basis. A valuation
allowance is established if the market value of such loans is
lower than their cost, and operations are charged or credited
for valuation adjustments. Upon sales of such loans, we receive
a fee for servicing the loans. The servicing asset is recorded
based on the present value of the contractually specified
servicing fee, net of adequate compensation, for the estimated
life of the loan, discounted by a rate in the range of
11 percent to 12 percent and a constant prepayment
rate ranging from 6 percent to 16 percent. The
servicing asset is amortized in proportion to and over the
period of estimated servicing income. Management periodically
evaluates the servicing asset for impairment. Impairment, if it
occurs, is recognized in a valuation allowance in the period of
impairment.
Interest-only strips are recorded based on the present value of
the excess of total servicing fee over the contractually
specified servicing fee for the estimated life of the loan,
calculated using the same assumptions as noted above. Such
interest-only strips are accounted for at their estimated fair
value, with unrealized gains or losses recorded as adjustments
to Other Comprehensive Income.
Servicing
Assets
Servicing assets are recorded at the lower of amortized cost or
fair value in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities. The fair values of servicing assets
represent either the price paid if purchased, or the allocated
carrying amounts based on relative values when retained in a
sale. Servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over
the period
60
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
of, estimated net servicing income. The fair value of servicing
assets is determined based on the present value of estimated net
future cash flows related to contractually specified servicing
fees.
Loans
Held for Sale
Loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market
are carried at the lower of cost or market value in the
aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through
a valuation allowance by charges to income.
Loan
Interest Income and Fees
Interest on loans is credited to income as earned and is accrued
only if deemed collectible. Direct loan origination costs are
offset by loan origination fees with the net amount deferred and
recognized over the contractual lives of the loans in interest
income as a yield adjustment using the effective interest
method. Discounts or premiums associated with purchased loans
are accreted or amortized to interest income using the interest
method over the contractual lives of the loans, adjusted for
prepayments. Accretion of discounts and deferred loan fees is
discontinued when loans are placed on non-accrual status.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in the opinion of
management, the full timely collection of principal or interest
is in doubt. Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued
when principal or interest payments become more than
90 days past due. However, in certain instances, we may
place a particular loan on non-accrual status earlier, depending
upon the individual circumstances surrounding the loans
delinquency. When an asset is placed on non-accrual status,
previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed against
current income. Subsequent collections of cash are applied as
principal reductions when received, except when the ultimate
collectibility of principal is probable, in which case interest
payments are credited to income. Non-accrual assets may be
restored to accrual status when principal and interest become
current and full repayment is expected. Interest income is
recognized on the accrual basis for impaired loans not meeting
the criteria for non-accrual.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to
provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
However, the allowance is an estimate that is inherently
uncertain and depends on the outcome of future events.
Managements estimates are based on previous loan loss
experience; volume, growth and composition of the loan
portfolio; the value of collateral; and current economic
conditions. Our lending is concentrated in commercial, consumer,
construction and real estate loans in the greater Los
Angeles/Orange County area. Although management believes the
level of the allowance is adequate to absorb probable losses
inherent in the loan portfolio, a decline in the local economy
may result in increasing losses that cannot reasonably be
predicted at this date.
Non-performing loans are those that are not earning income, and
(1) full payment of principal and interest is no longer
anticipated, (2) principal or interest is 90 days or
more delinquent, or (3) the loan payment or term has been
restructured in accordance with troubled debt restructure
procedures. The Bank generally places loans on non-accrual
status when interest or principal payments become 90 days
or more past due unless the outstanding principal and interest
is adequately secured and, in the opinion of management, is
deemed to be in the process of collection. When loans are placed
on non-accrual status, accrued but unpaid interest is reversed
against the current years income, and interest income on
non-accrual loans is recorded on a cash basis. The Bank may
treat payments as interest income or return of principal
depending upon managements opinion of the ultimate risk of
loss on the individual loan. Cash payments are treated as
interest income where management believes the remaining
principal balance is fully collectible. Additionally, the Bank
may place loans that are not 90 days past due on
non-accrual status, if management reasonably believes the
borrower will not be able to comply with the contractual loan
repayment terms and collection of principal or interest is in
question.
61
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Loan losses are charged, and recoveries are credited, to the
allowance account. Additions to the allowance account are
charged to the provision for credit losses. The allowance for
loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by
management to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. The
adequacy of the allowance is determined by management based upon
an evaluation and review of the loan portfolio, consideration of
historical loan loss experience, current economic conditions,
changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, analysis of
collateral values and other pertinent factors.
Loans are measured for impairment when it is probable that all
amounts, including principal and interest, will not be collected
in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
The amount of impairment and any subsequent changes are recorded
through the provision for credit losses as an adjustment to the
allowance for loan losses. Accounting standards require that an
impaired loan be measured based on:
1. the present value of the expected future cash flows,
discounted at the loans effective interest rate; or
2. the loans observable fair value; or
3. the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is
collateral-dependent.
We evaluate installment loans for impairment on a pooled basis.
These loans are considered to be smaller balance, homogeneous
loans and are evaluated on a portfolio basis considering the
projected net realizable value of the portfolio compared to the
net carrying value of the portfolio.
Hanmi Bank follows the Interagency Policy Statement on
the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and analyzes
the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. In addition,
as an integral part of the quarterly credit review process of
the Bank, the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
off-balance sheet items are reviewed for adequacy. The
California Department of Financial Institutions
(DFI)
and/or the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System require the
Bank to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses
based upon their assessment of the information available to them
at the time of their examinations.
Premises
and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation on furniture,
fixtures and equipment is computed on the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of
assets. The ranges of useful lives for the principal classes of
assets are as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
|
10 to 30 Years
|
Furniture and Equipment
|
|
Two to Seven Years
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
Term of Lease or Useful Life,
Whichever is Shorter
|
Software
|
|
Three Years
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This
Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell.
62
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Goodwill
Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over
fair value of net assets acquired, amounted to
$207.6 million and $209.1 million as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We adopted
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, effective January 1, 2002.
SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill be recorded at the
reporting unit level. Reporting units are defined as an
operating segment. We have identified one reporting
unit our banking operations. SFAS No. 142
prohibits the amortization of goodwill, but requires that it be
tested for impairment at least annually, or earlier if events
have occurred that might indicate impairment. We ceased
amortization of goodwill as of January 1, 2002. Our
impairment test is performed in two phases. The first step
involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its
carrying amount, including goodwill. Fair value of the reporting
unit is estimated using two different valuation techniques:
(a) discounted earnings cash flow and (b) average
market price to earnings multiple using a management selected
peer group. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, an additional procedure must be performed. This
additional procedure involves comparing the implied fair value
of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. An impairment loss is recorded through earnings to the
extent the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair
value. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, management is
unaware of any circumstances that would indicate a potential
impairment of goodwill.
Core
Deposit Intangible
We amortize the core deposit intangible (CDI)
balance using an accelerated method over eight years. As
required upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, we evaluated
the useful lives assigned to the CDI assets and determined that
no change was necessary and amortization expense was not
adjusted for the year ended December 31, 2006. As required
by SFAS No. 142, the CDI balance is assessed for
impairment or recoverability whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. The CDI recoverability analysis is consistent with
our policy for assessing impairment of long-lived assets. As of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
management is not aware of any circumstances that would indicate
impairment of the CDI asset, and no impairment charges were
recorded through earnings in 2006.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the gross carrying amount
of the CDI balance totaled $13.8 million and the related
accumulated amortization totaled $7.5 million and
$5.1 million, respectively. The total amortization expense
on the CDI balance was $2,379,000, $2,785,000 and $1,872,000
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Estimated future amortization expense of the CDI
balance is as follows: $2,039,000 in 2007; $1,675,000 in 2008;
$1,284,000 in 2009; $865,000 in 2010; $416,000 in 2011; and
$34,000 thereafter.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures
We have established three statutory business trusts that are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Hanmi Financial. In three separate
private placement transactions, the Trusts issued variable rate
capital securities representing undivided preferred beneficial
interests in the assets of the Trusts. Hanmi Financial is the
owner of all the beneficial interests represented by the common
securities of the Trusts.
FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities (Revised December 2003)
an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, requires that
variable interest entities be consolidated by a company if that
company is subject to a majority of expected loss from the
variable interest entitys activities or is entitled to
receive a majority of the entitys expected residual
returns or both. Junior subordinated debt represents liabilities
of the Hanmi Financial to the Trusts.
63
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Income
Taxes
We provide for income taxes using the asset and liability
method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided when it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized.
Share-Based
Compensation
We adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, on January 1, 2006 using the
modified prospective method. Under this method,
awards that are granted, modified or settled after
December 31, 2005 are measured and accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Also under this
method, expense is recognized for services attributed to the
current period for unvested awards that were granted prior to
January 1, 2006, based upon the fair value determined at
the grant date under SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), we accounted for stock compensation
under the intrinsic value method permitted by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and related
interpretations. Accordingly, we previously recognized no
compensation cost for employee stock options that were granted
with an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 in 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
Net Income As Reported
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
Add Share-Based
Employee Compensation Expense Included in Reported Net Income,
Net of Related Tax Effects (Restricted Stock Award)
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct Total
Share-Based Employee Compensation Expense Determined Under Fair
Value-Based Method for All Awards Subject to
SFAS No. 123, Net of Related Tax Effects
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
Pro Forma
|
|
$
|
57,424
|
|
|
$
|
36,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share As
Reported:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
Earnings Per Share Pro
Forma:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Staff Position
No. FAS 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax
Effects of the Share-Based Payment Awards
(FAS 123R-3).
We have adopted the alternative transition method prescribed by
FAS 123R-3
and concluded that we have no pool of tax benefits as of the
adoption date of SFAS No. 123(R).
64
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
SFAS No. 123(R) requires that cash flows resulting
from the realization of excess tax benefits recognized on awards
that were fully vested at the time of adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) be classified as a financing cash
inflow and an operating cash outflow in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows. Before the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), we presented all tax benefits
realized from the exercise of stock options as an operating cash
inflow.
In addition, SFAS No. 123(R) requires that any
unearned compensation related to awards granted prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) be eliminated against the
appropriate equity accounts. As a result, the presentation of
Shareholders Equity was revised to reflect the transfer of
the balance previously reported in Unearned Compensation to
Additional Paid-In Capital.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by
dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of
securities that could share in the earnings.
Treasury
Stock
We use the cost method of accounting for treasury stock. The
cost method requires us to record the reacquisition cost of
treasury stock as a deduction from shareholders equity on
the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Use of
Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications were made to the prior years
presentation to conform to the current years presentation.
NOTE 2
BUSINESS COMBINATION
On April 30, 2004, we completed our acquisition of PUB and
merged PUB with Hanmi Bank. We paid $164.6 million in cash
to acquire 5,537,431 of the PUB shares owned by Korea Exchange
Bank. All of the remaining PUB shares were converted in the
acquisition into shares of Hanmi Financials common stock
based on an exchange ratio of 2.312 Hanmi Financial shares for
each PUB share.
In addition, all outstanding PUB employee stock options were
converted into 137,414 options to purchase Hanmi Financial stock
valued at $1.1 million in total. Based on Hanmi
Financials average price of $12.53 for the
five-day
trading period from April 28 through May 4, 2004, the total
consideration paid for PUB was $324.6 million and resulted
in the recognition of goodwill aggregating $207.2 million.
65
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Purchase Price and Acquisition Costs
The purchase price was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands;
|
|
|
|
Except Share Prices)
|
|
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of PUB Stock
Outstanding as of April 30, 2004
|
|
|
10,908,821
|
|
Less Shares Acquired for Cash
|
|
|
(5,537,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of PUB Stock to
be Exchange for Hanmi Stock
|
|
|
5,371,390
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
2.312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Issued in PUB Acquisition
|
|
|
12,418,654
|
|
Multiplied by Hanmi
Financials Average Stock Price for the Period Two Days
Before Through Two Days After the April 29, 2004 Pricing of
the Merger Agreement
|
|
$
|
12.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
155,606
|
|
Stock Options:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value of 137,414
Hanmi Financial Stock Options to be Issued in Exchange for
59,443 PUB Outstanding Stock Options, Calculated Using the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, Modified for Dividends, With
Model Assumptions Estimated as of April 30, 2004 and a
Hanmi Financial Stock Price of $12.53, the Average Stock Price
for the Period Two Days Before Through Two Days After the
April 29, 2004 Pricing of the Merger Agreement
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
164,562
|
|
Transaction Costs:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
Stock Warrants
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
324,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
The purchase price was allocated based on the fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Book Value of Net Assets Acquired
|
|
$
|
110,683
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Record Acquired
Securities at Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
(1,489
|
)
|
Adjustment to Record Acquired
Loans at Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
376
|
|
Adjustment to Record Acquired
Fixed Assets at Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
Adjustment to Record Core Deposit
Intangible Asset
|
|
|
13,137
|
|
Adjustment to Record Various Other
Assets at Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
15
|
|
Adjustment to Record
Interest-Bearing Deposits at Fair Value
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Adjustment to Record Other
Borrowings at Fair Value
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
Adjustment to Record Severance
Benefits Associated with the Elimination of Positions,
Termination of Certain Contractual Obligations of PUB and Other
Miscellaneous Adjustments
|
|
|
(1,711
|
)
|
Adjustment to Record Deferred Tax
Liability
|
|
|
(7,948
|
)
|
Adjustment to Record Goodwill
Associated with the Acquisition of PUB
|
|
|
207,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
324,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the carrying amount of goodwill
from the PUB acquisition was $205.8 million compared to
$207.2 million at December 31, 2005, a decrease of
$1.5 million. The decrease was due to a tax refund related
to the acquisition of PUB.
67
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
The fair value of PUB net assets acquired was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Due From Banks
|
|
$
|
27,483
|
|
Federal Fund Sold
|
|
|
76,900
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
6,256
|
|
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
157,905
|
|
Loans Receivable, Net of Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
|
|
865,743
|
|
Premises and Equipment
|
|
|
11,668
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
3,498
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
205,815
|
|
Core Deposit Intangible
|
|
|
13,137
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
12,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,381,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
936,699
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
105,789
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
14,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,056,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired
|
|
$
|
324,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The core deposit intangible is being amortized using an
accelerated method over eight years. None of the goodwill
balance is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
Merger-related costs recognized as expenses during 2004
consisted of employee retention bonuses, the costs of vacating
duplicative branches within the existing network and the
impairment of fixed assets (primarily leasehold improvements)
associated with such branches. Of the $2,053,000 provided in
2004, $767,000 and $777,000 was utilized and charged against the
related liability in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The remaining
balance of $509,000 was reversed in 2005.
Certain costs (primarily PUB employee severance, data processing
contract termination costs, and the costs of vacating
duplicative branches within PUBs network) were recognized
as liabilities assumed in the business combination or
impairments of fixed assets associated with such branches.
Accordingly, they have been considered part of the purchase
price of PUB and recorded as an increase in the balance of
goodwill. Of the $4,515,000 provided, $95,000, $834,000 and
$2,444,000 was utilized and charged against the related
liability in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $1,142,000
was reversed in 2005.
68
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
We incurred the following merger-related costs for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
Expensed
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
(Credited)
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Merger-Related Costs
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of Merger-Related Costs
|
|
$
|
(509
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Merger-Related
Costs
2005
|
|
$
|
(509
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger-Related Costs
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Termination Costs
|
|
$
|
1,364
|
|
|
$
|
1,425
|
|
Contract Termination Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
Leasehold Termination Costs
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
Asset Impairments
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Merger-Related
Costs
2004
|
|
$
|
2,053
|
|
|
$
|
4,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3
SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENTS TO RESELL
We purchase government agency securities
and/or whole
loans under agreements to resell the same securities (reverse
repurchase agreements) with primary dealers. Amounts advanced
under these agreements represent cash and cash equivalents.
Securities subject to the reverse repurchase agreements are held
in the name of Hanmi Financial by dealers who arrange the
transactions. In the event that the fair value of the securities
decreases below the carrying amount of the related reverse
repurchase agreement, the counterparties are required to
designate an equivalent value of additional securities in the
name of Hanmi Financial.
The following is a summary of the securities purchased under
agreements to resell:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at Year-End
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
Average Balance Outstanding During
the Year
|
|
$
|
6,164
|
|
|
$
|
13,137
|
|
Maximum Amount Outstanding at Any
Month-End During the Year
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate
During the Year
|
|
|
5.09
|
%
|
|
|
3.38
|
%
|
69
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
NOTE 4
SECURITIES
The following is a summary of securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
123,614
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
|
$
|
121,608
|
|
U.S. Government Agency
Securities
|
|
|
119,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
118,244
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
69,966
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
71,710
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
67,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
66,113
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
8,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
5,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
394,042
|
|
|
$
|
2,146
|
|
|
$
|
5,576
|
|
|
$
|
390,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
149,311
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
2,187
|
|
|
$
|
147,268
|
|
U.S. Government Agency
Securities
|
|
|
129,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
127,813
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
71,536
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
73,220
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
83,068
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
81,456
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
8,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
5,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
446,738
|
|
|
$
|
2,061
|
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
$
|
442,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment
securities at December 31, 2006, by contractual maturity,
are shown below. Although mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations have contractual maturities
through 2036, expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
$
|
44,942
|
|
|
$
|
44,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Over One Year Through Five Years
|
|
|
90,049
|
|
|
|
88,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over Five Years Through Ten Years
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
7,976
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
Over Ten Years
|
|
|
59,998
|
|
|
|
61,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,823
|
|
|
|
202,891
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
123,614
|
|
|
|
121,608
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
67,605
|
|
|
|
66,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,219
|
|
|
|
187,721
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
394,042
|
|
|
$
|
390,612
|
|
|
$
|
967
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair
value of the related securities, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been
in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding Period
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Available for Sale
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
19,442
|
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
$
|
87,966
|
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
|
$
|
107,408
|
|
U.S. Government Agency
Securities
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
9,979
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
108,265
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
118,244
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
5,251
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
7,196
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
58,917
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
|
66,113
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
37,578
|
|
|
$
|
5,333
|
|
|
$
|
270,204
|
|
|
$
|
5,576
|
|
|
$
|
307,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
78,891
|
|
|
$
|
1,265
|
|
|
$
|
40,364
|
|
|
$
|
2,187
|
|
|
$
|
119,255
|
|
U.S. Government Agency
Securities
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
112,931
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
9,882
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
122,813
|
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
6,479
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
29,281
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
42,988
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
72,269
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
5,102
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,145
|
|
|
$
|
231,310
|
|
|
$
|
2,791
|
|
|
$
|
100,457
|
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
$
|
331,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
All individual securities that have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 had investment grade ratings
upon purchase. The issuers of these securities have not, to our
knowledge, established any cause for default on these securities
and the various rating agencies have reaffirmed these
securities long-term investment grade status at
December 31, 2006 and 2005. These securities have
fluctuated in value since their purchase dates as market
interest rates have fluctuated. However, we have the ability,
and management intends to hold these securities until their fair
values recover to cost. Therefore, in managements opinion,
all securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position for the past 12 months or longer as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 are not
other-than-temporarily
impaired, and therefore, no impairment charges as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 are warranted.
Securities with carrying values of $282.5 million and
$279.7 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for
other purposes as required or permitted by law.
There were $2,000, $117,000 and $134,000 in net realized gains
on sales of securities available for sale during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In 2006,
$254,000 ($184,000, net of tax) of unrealized losses arose
during the year and were included in comprehensive income and
$4,000 ($3,000, net of tax) of previously unrealized gains were
realized in earnings. In 2005, $3.6 million ($2.6 million,
net of tax) of unrealized losses arose during the year and were
included in comprehensive income and $114,000 ($83,000, net of
tax) of previously unrealized gains were realized in earnings.
In 2004, $983,000 ($713,000, net of tax) of unrealized losses
arose during the year and were included in comprehensive income
and $167,000 ($122,000, net of tax) of previously unrealized
losses were realized in earnings.
NOTE 5
LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Loans receivable consisted of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
$
|
757,428
|
|
|
$
|
733,650
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
202,207
|
|
|
|
152,080
|
|
Residential Property
|
|
|
81,128
|
|
|
|
87,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
1,040,763
|
|
|
|
973,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Term Loans
|
|
|
1,202,612
|
|
|
|
945,210
|
|
Commercial Lines of Credit
|
|
|
225,630
|
|
|
|
224,271
|
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
148,391
|
|
|
|
155,491
|
|
International Loans
|
|
|
126,561
|
|
|
|
106,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Industrial
Loans
|
|
|
1,703,194
|
|
|
|
1,431,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans
|
|
|
100,121
|
|
|
|
92,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Loans
|
|
|
2,844,078
|
|
|
|
2,496,753
|
|
Allowance for Loans Losses
|
|
|
(27,557
|
)
|
|
|
(24,963
|
)
|
Deferred Loan Fees
|
|
|
(3,001
|
)
|
|
|
(3,775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Receivable, Net
|
|
$
|
2,813,520
|
|
|
$
|
2,468,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Activity in the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
off-balance sheet items was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Off-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Off-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Off-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of
Year
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
27,093
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
24,502
|
|
|
$
|
13,349
|
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
$
|
14,734
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses Acquired
in PUB Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
Provision Charged to Operating
Expense
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
Loans Charged Off
|
|
|
(6,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,130
|
)
|
|
|
(5,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,198
|
)
|
|
|
(5,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,485
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
End of Year
|
|
$
|
27,557
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
29,687
|
|
|
$
|
24,963
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
27,093
|
|
|
$
|
22,702
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
24,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of interest foregone on impaired
loans for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest Income That Would Have
Been Recognized Had Impaired Loans Performed in Accordance With
Their Original Terms
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
|
$
|
957
|
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
Less: Interest Income Recognized
on Impaired Loans
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Foregone on Impaired
Loans
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information on impaired loans for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Recorded Investment With Related
Allowance
|
|
$
|
10,616
|
|
|
$
|
7,548
|
|
|
$
|
4,391
|
|
Recorded Investment With No
Related Allowance
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
Allowance on Impaired Loans
|
|
|
(6,731
|
)
|
|
|
(4,991
|
)
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Recorded Investment in
Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
7,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
$
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Total Recorded Investment
in Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
19,287
|
|
|
$
|
14,340
|
|
|
$
|
9,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers
whose loans are included above.
Loans on non-accrual status totaled $14.2 million and
$10.1 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Loans past due 90 days or more and still
accruing interest totaled $2,000 and $9,000 at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Restructured loans totaled
$5.5 million and $4.0 million at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
73
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
The following is an analysis of all loans to officers and
directors of Hanmi Financial and their affiliates. In the
opinion of management, all such loans were made under terms that
are consistent with our normal lending policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
|
Credit Granted, Including Renewals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance
End of Year
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from these loans totaled $72,000, $81,000 and $4,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and is reflected in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income.
NOTE 6
SERVICING ASSET
Changes in loan servicing rights, net of amortization, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of
Year
|
|
$
|
3,910
|
|
|
$
|
3,846
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
Valuation Write-Down
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(1,307
|
)
|
|
|
(1,086
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of
Year
|
|
$
|
4,579
|
|
|
$
|
3,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we serviced loans sold to
unaffiliated parties in the amounts of $236.0 million and
$180.9 million, respectively. All of the loans being
serviced were SBA loans.
NOTE 7
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of the major components of premises
and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
6,120
|
|
|
$
|
6,120
|
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
|
|
8,210
|
|
|
|
7,804
|
|
Furniture and Equipment
|
|
|
12,202
|
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
7,924
|
|
Software
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,797
|
|
|
|
34,330
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation and
Amortization
|
|
|
(15,722
|
)
|
|
|
(13,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Premises and Equipment,
Net
|
|
$
|
20,075
|
|
|
$
|
20,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $2,924,000,
$2,704,000 and $2,447,000 for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
74
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
NOTE 8
DEPOSITS
Time deposits by maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Less Than Three Months
|
|
$
|
811,211
|
|
|
$
|
701,140
|
|
After Three Months to Six Months
|
|
|
516,473
|
|
|
|
314,151
|
|
After Six Months to Twelve Months
|
|
|
340,856
|
|
|
|
407,689
|
|
After Twelve Months
|
|
|
10,306
|
|
|
|
16,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Time Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,678,846
|
|
|
$
|
1,439,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For time deposits having a remaining term of more than one year,
the aggregate amount of maturities for each of the five years
following the balance sheet date are as follows: $2,255,000 in
2007; $8,457,000 in 2008; $56,000 in 2009; $0 in 2010; and
$4,000 in 2011.
A summary of interest expense on deposits was as follows for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
1,853
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,790
|
|
Money Market Checking and NOW
Accounts
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
8,098
|
|
Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
|
|
|
64,184
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
10,966
|
|
Other Time Deposits
|
|
|
12,460
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense on
Deposits
|
|
$
|
93,036
|
|
|
$
|
54,192
|
|
|
$
|
26,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits reclassified to loans due to overdrafts at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $4.3 million and
$3.7 million, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 9
|
FHLB
ADVANCES AND OTHER BORROWINGS
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
FHLB Advances
|
|
$
|
168,107
|
|
|
$
|
43,527
|
|
Note Issued to
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FHLB Advances and Other
Borrowings
|
|
$
|
169,037
|
|
|
$
|
46,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
FHLB advances represent collateralized obligations with the FHLB
of San Francisco. A summary of contractual maturities
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
2008
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
2009
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
7,252
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,855
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
168,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial data pertaining to FHLB advances were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate at
End of Year
|
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate
During the Year
|
|
|
5.02
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
Average Balance of FHLB Advances
|
|
$
|
123,295
|
|
|
$
|
74,437
|
|
|
$
|
137,827
|
|
Maximum Amount Outstanding at Any
Month-End
|
|
$
|
168,250
|
|
|
$
|
100,700
|
|
|
$
|
261,000
|
|
All of the FHLB advances had fixed interest rates.
We have pledged investment securities available for sale and
loans receivable with carrying values of $53.3 million and
$284.8 million, respectively, as collateral with the FHLB
for this borrowing facility. The total borrowing capacity
available from the collateral that has been pledged is
$240.7 million, of which $72.6 million remained
available as of December 31, 2006.
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
interest expense on FHLB advances and other borrowings totaled
$7.0 million, $3.0 million and $3.3 million,
respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates were
5.02 percent, 3.63 percent and 2.14 percent,
respectively.
In 2006, we increased our lines of credit by $4.0 million.
Total credit lines for borrowing amounted to $158.0 million
and $154.0 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, there were
no borrowings under these credit lines.
NOTE 10
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
During the first half of 2004, we issued two junior subordinated
notes bearing interest at the three-month London InterBank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.90 percent totaling
$61.8 million and one junior subordinated note bearing
interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.63 percent
totaling $20.6 million. The securities have a floating
rate, which resets quarterly. Under the terms of the
transactions, the securities will mature in 2034 and are
redeemable, in whole or in part, without penalty, at the option
of Hanmi Financial after five years. The outstanding
subordinated debentures related to these offerings, the proceeds
of which financed the purchase of PUB, totaled
$82.4 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
76
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
interest expense on the junior subordinated debentures totaled
$6.4 million, $4.9 million and $3.0 million,
respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates were
7.79 percent, 5.95 percent and 3.69 percent,
respectively.
NOTE 11
INCOME TAXES
A summary of income taxes for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
34,471
|
|
|
$
|
29,779
|
|
|
$
|
16,010
|
|
State
|
|
|
9,059
|
|
|
|
9,383
|
|
|
|
6,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,530
|
|
|
|
39,162
|
|
|
|
22,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(2,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,350
|
)
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
State
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,942
|
)
|
|
|
(2,707
|
)
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
40,588
|
|
|
$
|
36,455
|
|
|
$
|
22,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Federal and state
deferred tax assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Loss Provision
|
|
$
|
13,608
|
|
|
$
|
12,419
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
State Taxes
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
Unrealized Loss on Securities
Available for Sale, Interest-Only Strips and Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
Other
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
19,655
|
|
|
|
17,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Accounting
|
|
|
(5,329
|
)
|
|
|
(6,497
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
(6,591
|
)
|
|
|
(8,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax
Assets
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
9,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management believes that it is more likely than not that the
results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable
income to realize the deferred tax assets, net of the valuation
allowance.
77
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
A reconciliation of the difference between the Federal statutory
income tax rate and the effective tax rate as of
December 31 is shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Statutory Tax Rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State Taxes, Net of Federal Tax
Benefits
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
Reversal of Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, net current taxes payable of
$1.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively, were
included in Other Liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition.
NOTE 12
EMPLOYEE SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
At December 31, 2006, we had two stock incentive plans, the
Year 2000 Stock Option Plan, which provides for the granting of
non-qualified and incentive stock options and restricted stock
awards to employees (including officers and directors), and our
2004 CEO Stock Option Plan, which provides for the grant of
stock options to our Chief Executive Officer.
Year
2000 Stock Option Plan
Under the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan, we may grant options for
up to 5,430,742 shares of common stock. As of
December 31, 2006, 2,206,092 shares were still
available for issuance.
All stock options granted under the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan
have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock options
granted under the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan generally vest
based on five years of continuous service and expire ten years
from the date of grant. Certain option and share awards provide
for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as
defined in the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan). New shares of
common stock may be issued or treasury shares may be utilized
upon the exercise of stock options.
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the
estimated weighted-average fair value per share of options
granted under the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Estimated Weighted-Average Fair
Value Per Share of Options Granted
|
|
$
|
6.23
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
The estimated weighted-average fair value per share of options
granted was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Yield
|
|
|
1.26%
|
|
|
|
1.18%
|
|
|
|
1.48%
|
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
|
34.79%
|
|
|
|
32.62%
|
|
|
|
33.04%
|
|
Expected Term
|
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
|
|
4.1 years
|
|
|
|
4.0 years
|
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate
|
|
|
4.85%
|
|
|
|
4.13%
|
|
|
|
2.75%
|
|
78
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Expected volatility is determined based on the historical daily
volatility of our stock price over a period equal to the
expected term of the options granted. The expected term of the
options represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding based primarily on the historical
exercise behavior associated with previous option grants. The
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve at the time of grant for a period equal to the expected
term of the options granted.
The following information under the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan
is presented for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Options
Granted
|
|
$
|
5,940
|
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
Fair Value of Options Vested
|
|
$
|
695
|
|
|
$
|
905
|
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
Total Intrinsic Value of Options
Exercised(1)
|
|
$
|
2,874
|
|
|
$
|
4,487
|
|
|
$
|
9,758
|
|
Cash Received from Options
Exercised
|
|
$
|
2,032
|
|
|
$
|
2,093
|
|
|
$
|
1,703
|
|
Actual Tax Benefit Realized from
Tax Deductions on Options Exercised
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Intrinsic value represents the difference between the closing
stock price on the exercise date and the exercise price,
multiplied by the number of options. |
The following is a summary of the transactions under the Year
2000 Stock Option Plan for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
Beginning of Year
|
|
|
1,173,712
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
1,618,836
|
|
|
$
|
9.33
|
|
|
|
1,500,064
|
|
|
$
|
5.52
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
953,000
|
|
|
$
|
19.17
|
|
|
|
135,554
|
|
|
$
|
17.10
|
|
|
|
791,000
|
|
|
$
|
13.51
|
|
Options Assumed in PUB Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
137,414
|
|
|
$
|
5.11
|
|
Options Exercised
|
|
|
(257,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
(391,094
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.44
|
|
|
|
(670,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(111,540
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.39
|
|
|
|
(189,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.26
|
|
|
|
(139,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.61
|
|
Options Expired
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
End of Year
|
|
|
1,755,813
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
1,173,712
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
1,618,836
|
|
|
$
|
9.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable End
of Year
|
|
|
471,903
|
|
|
$
|
8.55
|
|
|
|
520,602
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
487,242
|
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
The following is a summary of the transactions for non-vested
stock options under the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options
Outstanding Beginning of Year
|
|
|
653,110
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
1,131,594
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
844,910
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
953,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
135,554
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
|
791,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
Options Vested
|
|
|
(210,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
(424,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
(365,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(111,540
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
(189,584
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
(139,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options Outstanding
End of Year
|
|
|
1,283,910
|
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
653,110
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
1,131,594
|
|
|
$
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006, compensation expense
of $742,000 for the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan was recognized
in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of
December 31, 2006, the total compensation cost not yet
recognized under the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan was
$5.9 million with a weighted-average recognition period of
3.6 years.
As of December 31, 2006, stock options outstanding under
the Year 2000 Stock Option Plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Price Range
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
$3.27 to $4.99
|
|
|
156,666
|
|
|
$
|
2,938
|
|
|
$
|
3.78
|
|
|
|
3.8 years
|
|
|
|
156,666
|
|
|
$
|
2,938
|
|
|
$
|
3.78
|
|
|
|
3.8 years
|
|
$5.00 to $9.99
|
|
|
141,593
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
4.3 years
|
|
|
|
141,593
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
4.3 years
|
|
$10.00 to $14.99
|
|
|
434,000
|
|
|
|
3,918
|
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
7.3 years
|
|
|
|
149,533
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
7.3 years
|
|
$15.00 to $19.99
|
|
|
735,554
|
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
|
$
|
17.93
|
|
|
|
9.2 years
|
|
|
|
24,111
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
17.03
|
|
|
|
8.3 years
|
|
$20.00 to $21.63
|
|
|
288,000
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
21.63
|
|
|
|
9.9 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,755,813
|
|
|
$
|
12,678
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
8.0 years
|
|
|
|
471,903
|
|
|
$
|
6,599
|
|
|
$
|
8.55
|
|
|
|
6.8 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Intrinsic value represents the difference between the closing
stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was
$22.53 as of December 29, 2006, and the exercise price,
multiplied by the number of options. |
2004
CEO Stock Option Plan
Under the 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan, a total of 350,000 stock
options were granted to our Chief Executive Officer. As of
December 31, 2006, there were no additional shares
available for issuance.
All stock options granted under the 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan
have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock options
granted under the 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan vest based on six
years of continuous service and expire ten years from the date
of grant. Certain option and share awards provide for
accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined
in the 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan). New shares of common stock
may be issued or treasury shares may be utilized upon the
exercise of stock options.
80
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
There were no stock options granted under the 2004 CEO Stock
Option Plan during the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005.
The following is a summary of the transactions under the 2004
CEO Stock Option Plan for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
Beginning of Year
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
End of Year
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
End of Year
|
|
|
58,333
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the transactions for non-vested
stock options under the 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options
Outstanding Beginning of Year
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
Options Vested
|
|
|
(58,333
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested Options
Outstanding End of Year
|
|
|
291,667
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006, compensation expense
of $416,000 for the 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan was recognized in
the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of December 31,
2006, the total compensation cost not yet recognized under the
2004 CEO Stock Option Plan was $1.0 million with a
recognition period of 3.8 years.
As of December 31, 2006, stock options outstanding under
the 2004 CEO Stock Option Plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Life
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,878
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
7.9 years
|
|
|
58,333
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
|
7.9 years
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Intrinsic value represents the difference between the closing
stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was
$22.53 as of December 29, 2006, and the exercise price,
multiplied by the number of options. |
81
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Restricted
Stock Award
In February 2005, 100,000 shares of restricted stock were
granted to Dr. Sung Won Sohn, our Chief Executive Officer.
20,000 of these shares vested immediately, and an additional
20,000 shares vest each year over the next four years on
the anniversary date of the grant. The market value of the
shares awarded totaled $1,815,000. For the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, compensation expense of
$363,000 and $665,000, respectively, related to the restricted
stock award was recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
NOTE 13
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Stock
Warrants
In 2004, we issued stock warrants to affiliates of Castle Creek
Financial LLC for services rendered in connection with the
placement of our equity securities. Under the terms of the
warrants, the warrant holders can purchase a total of
508,558 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$9.50 per share. The warrants were immediately exercisable
and expire after five years. During the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, 160,056, 0 and
20,000 shares of common stock, respectively, were issued in
connection with the exercise of stock warrants. As of
December 31, 2006, there were 328,502 warrants outstanding.
Repurchase
of Common Stock
On August 25, 2005, we repurchased 1,163,000 shares of
our common stock from Korea Exchange Bank for an aggregate
purchase price of $20.0 million as part of our ongoing
capital management program. Repurchased shares are held in
treasury pending use for general corporate purposes, including
issuances under our stock option plans.
NOTE 14
REGULATORY MATTERS
Hanmi Financial and the Bank are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the Federal banking
regulatory agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and
possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material
effect on our consolidated financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, Hanmi Financial and the Bank must meet
specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of the assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items
as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital
amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings
and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require Hanmi Financial and the Bank to
maintain minimum ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total
and Tier 1 Capital (as defined in the regulations) to
Risk-Weighted Assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 Capital
(as defined) to Average Assets (as defined). Management believes
that, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, Hanmi Financial and
the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they
were subject.
As of December 31, 2006, the most recent notification from
the Federal Reserve Board categorized the Bank as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well
capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum Total
Risk-Based, Tier 1 Risk-Based, and Tier 1 Leverage
Ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions
or events since that notification which management believes have
changed the institutions category.
82
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
The capital ratios of Hanmi Financial and Hanmi Bank at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Minimum to Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory
|
|
|
Categorized as
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Requirement
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted
Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
384,895
|
|
|
|
12.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
245,408
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
376,422
|
|
|
|
12.28
|
%
|
|
$
|
245,158
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
306,447
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to
Risk-Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
355,186
|
|
|
|
11.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
122,704
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
346,713
|
|
|
|
11.31
|
%
|
|
$
|
122,579
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
183,868
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average
Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
355,186
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
%
|
|
$
|
140,947
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
346,713
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
140,827
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
176,034
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted
Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
319,866
|
|
|
|
12.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
212,617
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
318,099
|
|
|
|
11.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
212,383
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
265,478
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to
Risk-Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
292,750
|
|
|
|
11.03
|
%
|
|
$
|
106,191
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
290,983
|
|
|
|
10.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
106,191
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
159,287
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average
Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanmi Financial
|
|
$
|
295,750
|
|
|
|
9.11
|
%
|
|
$
|
128,566
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
290,983
|
|
|
|
9.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
128,447
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
160,558
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
The average reserve balance required to be maintained with the
FRB was $1.5 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Memorandum
of Understanding
On July 20, 2005, following a joint regular examination by
the FRB and the DFI, the Banks Board of Directors approved
and signed an informal memorandum of understanding
(Memorandum) in connection with certain deficiencies
identified by the regulators relating to the Banks
compliance with certain provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act and
anti-money laundering regulations. On December 21, 2006,
following a joint examination by the FRB and the DFI, the
Memorandum was terminated.
83
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
NOTE 15
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS Income
Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
|
48,850,221
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
Effect of Dilutive
Securities Options and Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,907
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Income
Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
|
49,435,128
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS Income
Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
49,174,885
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
Effect of Dilutive
Securities Options and Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,471
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Income
Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
|
49,942,356
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS Income
Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
42,268,964
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Effect of Dilutive
Securities Options and Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248,293
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Income
Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
43,517,257
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, there
were 1,373,554 options, 50,554 options and 354,000 options
outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the
computation of diluted EPS because their exercise price was
greater than the average market price of the common shares and,
therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
NOTE 16
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
401(k)
Plan
We have a Section 401(k) plan for the benefit of
substantially all of our employees. We match 75 percent of
participant contributions to the 401(k) plan up to
8 percent of each 401(k) plan participants annual
compensation. We made contributions to the 401(k) plan for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 of $1,008,000,
$918,000 and $858,000, respectively.
Bank-Owned
Life Insurance
In 2001 and 2004, we purchased single premium life insurance
policies called bank-owned life insurance covering certain
officers. Hanmi Bank is the beneficiary under the policy. In the
event of the death of a covered officer, we will receive the
specified insurance benefit from the insurance carrier.
84
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Deferred
Compensation Plan
Effective November 1, 2006, the Board of Directors approved
the Hanmi Financial Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan
(the DCP). The DCP is a non-qualified deferred
compensation program for directors and certain key employees
whereby they may defer a portion of annual compensation for
payment upon retirement of the amount deferred plus a guaranteed
return. The DCP is unfunded. As of December 31, 2006, the
liability for the deferred compensation plan and interest
thereon was $112,000.
NOTE 17
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Interest
Rate Swap
During 2004, to hedge interest rate risk, the Bank entered into
an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2009, wherein the
Bank received a fixed rate of 7.29 percent at quarterly
intervals, and paid Prime-based floating rates at quarterly
intervals on a total notional amount of $10.0 million.
During 2003, to hedge interest rate risk, the Bank entered into
four interest rate swap agreements maturing in 2008, wherein the
Bank received fixed rates of 5.77 percent,
6.37 percent, 6.51 percent and 6.76 percent, at
quarterly intervals, and paid Prime-based floating rates, at
quarterly intervals, on a total notional amount of
$60.0 million. These swaps were designated as cash flow
hedges for accounting purposes.
In 2005, the Bank terminated these swaps. At such time, the
swaps were in an unfavorable position of $2,139,000. Such amount
is being amortized in amounts proportional to the interest
income associated with the hedged loan pools over the remaining
terms of the swaps or the lives of the hedged loans, whichever
is shorter. For the year ended December 31, 2006,
amortization expense of $879,000 was recognized in Other
Operating Expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Equity
Swap
In 2004, the Bank offered a certificate of deposit
(CD) product that paid interest tied to the movement
in the Standard & Poors 500 Index plus
1.00 percent annual interest. Such CDs will mature in
November 2009. The economic characteristics and risks of the
embedded option were not clearly and closely related to the CD.
Therefore, the embedded option was separated from the CD and
accounted for separately in liabilities. As of December 31,
2006 and 2005, the fair value of the embedded option was
$1,641,000 and $1,280,000, respectively, and the change in the
liability during 2006 and 2005 was $361,000 and ($116,000),
respectively. The changes were recognized in earnings.
To place an economic hedge for the market risk described above,
the Bank purchased an equity swap with a notional amount of
$9,340,000. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair
value of the equity swap was $872,000 and $88,000, respectively,
and the change in the asset during 2006 and 2005 was $784,000
and ($111,000), respectively. The changes were recognized in
earnings.
Currency
Swap
In 2005, the Bank offered a CD product that paid interest based
on the increase in the weighted-average value of five Asian
currencies (Korean Won, Singapore Dollar, Taiwan Dollar, Thai
Baht and Chinese Yuan) against the U.S. Dollar plus
0.25 percent annual interest. The economic characteristics
and risks of the embedded option were not clearly and closely
related to the CD. Therefore, the embedded option was separated
from the CD and accounted for separately in liabilities. The
CDs matured in February 2006. As of December 31,
2005, the fair value of the embedded option was $5,000, and the
change in the liability during 2006 and 2005 was ($5,000) and
($415,000), respectively. The changes were recognized in
earnings.
85
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
To place an economic hedge for the market risk described above,
the Bank purchased a currency swap with a notional amount of
$14,274,000. The swap terminated in February 2006. As of
December 31, 2005, the fair value of the currency swap was
($105,000), and the change in the asset during 2006 and 2005 was
$63,000 and ($63,000), respectively. The changes were recognized
in earnings.
NOTE 18
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We lease our premises under non-cancelable operating leases. At
December 31, 2006, future minimum annual rental commitments
under these non-cancelable operating leases, with initial or
remaining terms of one year or more, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
4,093
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses recorded under such leases in 2006, 2005 and
2004 amounted to $4,063,000, $3,389,000 and $3,226,000,
respectively.
In the normal course of business, we are involved in various
legal claims. Management has reviewed all legal claims against
us with in-house or outside legal counsel and has taken into
consideration the views of such counsel as to the outcome of the
claims. In managements opinion, the final disposition of
all such claims will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 19
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing
needs of our customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of
credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized
in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The
Banks exposure to credit losses in the event of
non-performance by the other party to commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the
contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses
the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for extending loan facilities to
customers. The Bank evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by
the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on managements
credit evaluation of the counterparty.
86
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable;
inventory; property, plant and equipment; and income-producing
or borrower-occupied properties. The following table shows the
distribution of undisbursed loan commitments as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
$
|
578,347
|
|
|
$
|
555,736
|
|
Commercial Letters of Credit
|
|
|
65,158
|
|
|
|
58,036
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
48,289
|
|
|
|
42,768
|
|
Unused Credit Card Lines
|
|
|
17,031
|
|
|
|
14,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Undisbursed
Loan Commitments
|
|
$
|
708,825
|
|
|
$
|
671,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 20
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been
determined by using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is
required to interpret market data in order to develop estimates
of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are
not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we could realize
in a current market exchange. The use of different market
assumptions
and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Contract
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
or Contract
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
|
$
|
138,501
|
|
|
$
|
163,477
|
|
|
$
|
163,477
|
|
Term Federal Funds Sold
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
390,612
|
|
|
|
390,612
|
|
|
|
442,863
|
|
|
|
442,863
|
|
Loans Receivable, Net
|
|
|
2,813,520
|
|
|
|
2,834,864
|
|
|
|
2,468,015
|
|
|
|
2,460,092
|
|
Loans Held for Sale
|
|
|
23,870
|
|
|
|
23,870
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
16,919
|
|
|
|
16,919
|
|
|
|
14,120
|
|
|
|
14,120
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
12,237
|
|
|
|
12,237
|
|
Equity Swap
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
87
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Contract
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
or Contract
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Noninterest-Bearing Deposits
|
|
|
728,347
|
|
|
|
728,347
|
|
|
|
738,618
|
|
|
|
738,618
|
|
Interest-Bearing Deposits
|
|
|
2,216,368
|
|
|
|
2,216,757
|
|
|
|
2,087,496
|
|
|
|
2,087,496
|
|
FHLB Advances, Other Borrowings
and Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
251,443
|
|
|
|
254,058
|
|
|
|
128,737
|
|
|
|
129,441
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
|
|
11,911
|
|
|
|
11,911
|
|
Currency Swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Embedded Derivative
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ITEMS
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
|
|
578,347
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
555,736
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
|
|
48,289
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
42,768
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable
to estimate that value are explained below:
Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying
amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
Term Federal Funds Sold The carrying
amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
Securities The fair value of
securities is generally obtained from market bids for similar or
identical securities or obtained from independent securities
brokers or dealers.
Loans Fair values are estimated for
portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics,
primarily fixed and adjustable rate interest terms. The fair
values of fixed rate mortgage loans are based on discounted cash
flows utilizing applicable risk-adjusted spreads relative to the
current pricing of similar fixed rate loans, as well as
anticipated repayment schedules. The fair value of adjustable
rate commercial loans is based on the estimated discounted cash
flows utilizing the discount rates that approximate the pricing
of loans collateralized by similar commercial properties. The
fair value of non-performing loans at December 31, 2006 and
2005 was not estimated because it is not practicable to
reasonably assess the credit adjustment that would be applied in
the marketplace for such loans. The estimated fair value is net
of allowance for loan losses.
Accrued Interest Receivable The
carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its
fair value.
Federal Reserve Bank Stock and Federal Home Loan Bank
Stock The carrying amounts approximate fair
value as the stock may be resold to the issuer at carrying value.
Equity Swap The carrying amounts of
the equity swap approximate their fair value.
Deposits The fair value of
non-maturity deposits is the amount payable on demand at the
reporting date. Non-maturity deposits include
noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings accounts and money
market checking. Discounted cash flows have been used to value
term deposits such as certificates of deposit. The discount rate
used is based on interest rates currently being offered by the
Bank on comparable deposits as to amount and term.
88
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
Accrued Interest Payable The carrying
amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
FHLB Advances, Other Borrowings and Junior Subordinated
Debentures Discounted cash flows have been
used to value FHLB advances, other borrowings and junior
subordinated debentures.
Currency Swap and Embedded Derivative
The carrying amounts of the currency swap and embedded
derivative approximate their fair value.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of
Credit The fair values of commitments to
extend credit and standby letters of credit are based upon the
difference between the current value of similar loans and the
price at which the Bank has committed to make the loans.
Note 21
Condensed Financial Information of Parent Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
7,578
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
Investment in Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
558,645
|
|
|
|
505,009
|
|
Investment in Unconsolidated
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
573,555
|
|
|
$
|
512,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
$
|
82,406
|
|
|
$
|
82,406
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
3,373
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
487,117
|
|
|
|
426,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
573,555
|
|
|
$
|
512,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Equity in Earnings of Hanmi Bank
|
|
$
|
71,375
|
|
|
$
|
62,001
|
|
|
$
|
39,574
|
|
Other Expenses, Net
|
|
|
(9,266
|
)
|
|
|
(6,133
|
)
|
|
|
(4,673
|
)
|
Income Tax Benefit
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
65,649
|
|
|
$
|
58,229
|
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net
Income to Net Cash Used In Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings of Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
(71,375
|
)
|
|
|
(62,001
|
)
|
|
|
(39,574
|
)
|
Decrease (Increase) in Receivable
from Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Share-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Other Assets
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
|
|
(718
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in Other
Liabilities
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
Excess Tax Benefit from Exercises
of Stock Options
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating
Activities
|
|
|
(4,140
|
)
|
|
|
(4,109
|
)
|
|
|
(3,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Received from Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
|
27,541
|
|
|
|
11,990
|
|
Capital Contribution to Hanmi Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,000
|
)
|
Acquisition of Pacific Union Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,710
|
)
|
Purchase of Investment in
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In)
Investing Activities
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
|
27,541
|
|
|
|
(142,195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Junior Subordinated
Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,406
|
|
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock
Options and Stock Warrants
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
3,425
|
|
Stock Issued Through Private
Placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,710
|
|
Repurchase of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends Paid
|
|
|
(11,805
|
)
|
|
|
(9,813
|
)
|
|
|
(7,740
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(8,252
|
)
|
|
|
(27,338
|
)
|
|
|
149,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN
CASH
|
|
|
6,108
|
|
|
|
(3,906
|
)
|
|
|
3,922
|
|
Cash Beginning of Year
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
5,376
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH END OF
YEAR
|
|
$
|
7,578
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
5,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004 (Continued)
NOTE 22
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial data follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands; Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
58,535
|
|
|
$
|
63,906
|
|
|
$
|
68,664
|
|
|
$
|
69,084
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
21,680
|
|
|
|
25,509
|
|
|
|
28,934
|
|
|
|
30,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Before
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
36,855
|
|
|
|
38,397
|
|
|
|
39,730
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
8,287
|
|
|
|
8,784
|
|
|
|
10,789
|
|
Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
17,439
|
|
|
|
19,416
|
|
|
|
19,473
|
|
|
|
19,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision for Income
Taxes
|
|
|
24,200
|
|
|
|
26,368
|
|
|
|
27,359
|
|
|
|
28,310
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
9,398
|
|
|
|
10,428
|
|
|
|
9,762
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
14,802
|
|
|
$
|
15,940
|
|
|
$
|
17,597
|
|
|
$
|
17,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
43,602
|
|
|
$
|
48,063
|
|
|
$
|
52,401
|
|
|
$
|
56,875
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
11,347
|
|
|
|
13,462
|
|
|
|
16,831
|
|
|
|
20,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Before
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
32,255
|
|
|
|
34,601
|
|
|
|
35,570
|
|
|
|
36,404
|
|
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
6,964
|
|
|
|
6,891
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
7,776
|
|
Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
17,405
|
|
|
|
16,212
|
|
|
|
16,991
|
|
|
|
18,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Provision for Income
Taxes
|
|
|
21,678
|
|
|
|
24,830
|
|
|
|
24,173
|
|
|
|
24,003
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
8,346
|
|
|
|
9,792
|
|
|
|
9,204
|
|
|
|
9,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
13,332
|
|
|
$
|
15,038
|
|
|
$
|
14,969
|
|
|
$
|
14,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Reclassifications have been made to the 2006 and 2005 quarterly
financial statements to conform to the current presentation.
NOTE 23
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
Effective January 1, 2007, Hanmi Financial acquired two
full-service insurance agencies, Chun Ha Insurance Services,
Inc. and All World Insurance Services, Inc., Garden Grove,
California, as wholly-owned subsidiaries. The acquisition is not
expected to have a significant effect on our financial position
or results of operations.
91
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Sung
Won Sohn, Ph.D.
|
Sung Won Sohn, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 1, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated as
of March 1, 2007.
|
|
|
/s/ Sung
Won
Sohn, Ph.D.
Sung
Won Sohn, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/ Michael
J. Winiarski
Michael
J. Winiarski
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
B. C. Lee
Richard
B. C. Lee
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ I Joon
Ahn
I Joon
Ahn
Director
|
|
/s/ Kraig
A. Kupiec
Kraig
A. Kupiec
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joon
Hyung Lee
Joon
Hyung Lee
Director
|
|
/s/ M. Christian
Mitchell
M. Christian
Mitchell
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Chang
Kyu Park
Chang
Kyu Park
Director
|
|
/s/ Joseph
K. Rho
Joseph
K. Rho
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
J. Ruh
William
J. Ruh
Director
|
|
/s/ Won
R. Yoon
Won
R. Yoon
Director
|
92
HANMI
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation, As
Amended *
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws, As Amended *
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate of Registrant
*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Employment Agreement with Sung Won
Sohn ***
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Hanmi Financial Corporation Year
2000 Stock Option Plan **
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Hanmi Financial Corporation 2004
CEO Stock Option Plan ****
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Hanmi Financial Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
14
|
|
|
Code of Ethics ***
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant ****
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference herein from
Hanmi Financials Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(No. 333-32770)
filed with the SEC on March 20, 2000. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference herein from
Hanmi Financials Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(No. 333-44320
and 44090) filed with the SEC on August 18, 2000. |
|
*** |
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference herein from
Hanmi Financials Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on
March 16, 2005. |
|
**** |
|
Previously filed and incorporated by reference herein from
Hanmi Financials Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus on
Form S-4
filed with the SEC on February 9, 2004. |
93