Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From To

Commission File Number: 000-30421

HANMI FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Delaware		95-4788120
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3660 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A Los Angeles, California		90010
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(213) 382-2200

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large Accelerated Filer	x	Accelerated Filer	¨
Non-Accelerated Filer	¨ (Do Not Check if a Smaller Reporting Company)	Smaller Reporting Company	¨
		Emerging Growth Company	¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of August 4, 2017, there were 32,407,152 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.

Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Table of Contents



Part I – Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	5

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)	6

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	7

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	68

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	69

Part II – Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	70

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	70

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	70

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	70

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	70

Item 5.	Other Information	70

Item 6.	Exhibits	71

Signatures		72

Part I — Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)



	(Unaudited) June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	138,507		$	147,235
Securities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $571,611 as of June 30, 2017 and $521,053 as of December 31, 2016)	571,846			516,964
Loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or fair value	10,949			9,316
Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $33,758 as of June 30, 2017 and $32,429 as of December 31, 2016	4,039,304			3,812,340
Accrued interest receivable	11,167			10,987
Premises and equipment, net	26,869			28,698
Other real estate owned ("OREO"), net	4,321			7,484
Customers’ liability on acceptances	1,481			978
Servicing assets	10,480			10,564
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net	12,712			12,889
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock, at cost	16,385			16,385
Income tax asset, net	50,286			48,047
Bank-owned life insurance	49,982			49,440
Prepaid expenses and other assets	29,057			30,019
Total assets	$	4,973,346		$	4,701,346
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	1,260,929		$	1,203,240
Interest-bearing	2,998,244			2,606,497
Total deposits	4,259,173			3,809,737
Accrued interest payable	3,432			2,567
Bank’s liability on acceptances	1,481			978
FHLB advances	20,000			315,000
Subordinated debentures	117,011			18,978
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	22,109			23,061
Total liabilities	4,423,206			4,170,321
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized 62,500,000 shares; issued 33,039,034 shares (32,393,856 shares outstanding) as of June 30, 2017 and issued 32,946,197 shares (32,330,747 shares outstanding) as of December 31, 2016	33			33
Additional paid-in capital	563,948			562,446
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax expense of $98 as of June 30, 2017 and tax benefit of $1,696 as of December 31, 2016	137			(2,394		)
Retained earnings	57,717			41,726
Less: treasury stock, at cost; 645,178 shares as of June 30, 2017 and 615,450 shares as of December 31, 2016	(71,695		)	(70,786		)
Total stockholders’ equity	550,140			531,025
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,973,346		$	4,701,346

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Interest and dividend income:
Interest and fees on loans and leases	$	47,971		$	40,645		$	93,349		$	79,712
Interest on securities	2,949			2,886			5,468			5,903
Dividends on Federal Reserve Bank ("FRB") and FHLB stock	283			579			657			1,121
Interest on deposits in other banks	123			49			200			97
Total interest and dividend income	51,326			44,159			99,674			86,833
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits	6,463			3,684			11,617			7,410
Interest on FHLB advances	49			299			517			494
Interest on subordinated debentures	1,636			196			2,009			379
Total interest expense	8,148			4,179			14,143			8,283
Net interest income before provision for loan and lease losses	43,178			39,980			85,531			78,550
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	422			(1,515		)	342			(3,040		)
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses	42,756			41,495			85,189			81,590
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts	2,461			2,898			4,989			5,899
Trade finance and other service charges and fees	1,269			1,064			2,316			2,109
Gain on sales of Small Business Administration ("SBA") loans	2,668			1,774			4,132			2,632
Disposition gains on Purchased Credit Impaired ("PCI") loans	540			1,963			723			2,622
Net gain on sales of securities	938			—			1,206			—
Other operating income	1,826			1,674			3,551			3,072
Total noninterest income	9,702			9,373			16,917			16,334
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	16,623			16,061			33,727			31,759
Occupancy and equipment	3,878			3,938			7,861			7,434
Data processing	1,738			1,454			3,369			2,889
Professional fees	1,554			1,509			2,702			2,974
Supplies and communications	745			709			1,379			1,445
Advertising and promotion	1,015			1,094			1,817			1,616
OREO expense (income)	519			183			418			648
Merger and integration costs (income)	(9		)	—			(40		)	—
Other operating expenses	2,881			2,915			4,948			5,167
Total noninterest expense	28,944			27,863			56,181			53,932
Income before income tax expense	23,514			23,005			45,925			43,992
Income tax expense	9,057			8,857			17,685			15,040
Net income	$	14,457		$	14,148		$	28,240		$	28,952
Basic earnings per share	$	0.45		$	0.44		$	0.88		$	0.90
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.45		$	0.44		$	0.87		$	0.90
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	32,078,038			31,882,489			32,040,113			31,864,427
Diluted	32,243,034			32,029,910			32,216,671			32,001,163

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(in thousands)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income	$	14,457		$	14,148		$	28,240		$	28,952
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities:
Unrealized holding gain arising during period	3,910			6,424			5,530			16,147
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gain included in net income	(938		)	—			(1,206		)	—
Unrealized loss on interest-only strip of servicing assets	—			(9		)	—			(9		)
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income	(1,232		)	(2,658		)	(1,793		)	(6,702		)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	1,740			3,757			2,531			9,436
Comprehensive income	$	16,197		$	17,905		$	30,771		$	38,388

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share data)



	Common Stock - Number of Shares					Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares Issued	Treasury Shares		Shares Outstanding		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock, at Cost			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at January 1, 2016	32,566,522	(592,163	)	31,974,359		$	257		$	557,761	$	(315	)	$	6,422		$	(70,207	)	$	493,918
Correction of accounting for the 2011 1-for-8 stock split	—	—		—		(224		)	224		—			—			—			—
Stock options exercised	40,209	—		40,209		—			562		—			—			—			562
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures	256,276	—		256,276		—			—		—			—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense	—	—		—		—			1,542		—			—			—			1,542
Restricted stock surrendered due to employee tax liability	—	(10,524	)	(10,524	)	—			—		—			—			(247		)	(247		)
Cash dividends declared	—	—		—		—			—		—			(8,978		)	—			(8,978		)
Net income	—	—		—		—			—		—			28,952			—			28,952
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of income taxes	—	—		—		—			—		9,436			—			—			9,436
Balance at June 30, 2016	32,863,007	(602,687	)	32,260,320		$	33		$	560,089	$	9,121		$	26,396		$	(70,454	)	$	525,185

Balance at January 1, 2017	32,946,197	(615,450	)	32,330,747		$	33		$	562,446	$	(2,394	)	$	41,726		$	(70,786	)	$	531,025
Stock options exercised	11,500	—		11,500		—			139		—			—			—			139
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures	81,337	—		81,337		—			—		—			—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense	—	—		—		—			1,363		—			—			—			1,363
Restricted stock surrendered due to employee tax liability	—	(29,728	)	(29,728	)	—			—		—			—			(909		)	(909		)
Cash dividends declared	—	—		—		—			—		—			(12,249		)	—			(12,249		)
Net income	—	—		—		—			—		—			28,240			—			28,240
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of income taxes	—	—		—		—			—		2,531			—			—			2,531
Balance at June 30, 2017	33,039,034	(645,178	)	32,393,856		$	33		$	563,948	$	137		$	57,717		$	(71,695	)	$	550,140

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(in thousands)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	28,240		$	28,952
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	7,081			7,595
Share-based compensation expense	1,363			1,542
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	342			(3,040		)
Gain on sales of securities	(1,206		)	—
Gain on sales of SBA loans	(4,132		)	(2,632		)
Loss (gain) on sale of premises and equipment	76			(35		)
Disposition gains on PCI loans	(723		)	(2,622		)
Gain on sales of OREO	(532		)	—
Valuation adjustment on OREO	949			648
Origination of SBA loans held for sale	(53,667		)	(42,559		)
Proceeds from sales of SBA loans	56,938			35,119
Change in accrued interest receivable	(180		)	(1,051		)
Change in bank-owned life insurance	(542		)	(511		)
Change in prepaid expenses and other assets	(508		)	882
Change in income tax assets	(4,032		)	(1,689		)
Change in accrued interest payable	865			(70		)
Change in FDIC loss sharing liability	—			(1,271		)
Change in accrued expenses and other liabilities	633			(8,366		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	30,965			10,892
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from matured, called and repayment of securities	33,665			74,063
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	52,688			—
Proceeds from sales of OREO	3,386			1,297
Change in loans and leases receivable, excluding purchases	(157,068		)	(171,240		)
Purchases of securities	(138,777		)	—
Purchases of premises and equipment	269			(1,393		)
Purchases of loans receivable	(73,008		)	(97,200		)
Purchases of FRB stock	—			(325		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(278,845		)	(194,798		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in deposits	449,436			79,313
Change in overnight FHLB borrowings	(295,000		)	110,000
Issuance of subordinated debentures	97,735			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	139			562
Cash paid for treasury shares acquired in respect of share-based compensation	(909		)	(247		)
Cash dividends paid	(12,249		)	(13,454		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	239,152			176,174
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(8,728		)	(7,732		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	147,235			164,364
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	138,507		$	156,632





Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest	$	14,143		$	8,353
Income taxes	$	19,826		$	16,486
Non-cash activities:
Transfer of loans receivable to OREO	$	143		$	4,318
Income tax expense related to items in other comprehensive income	$	(1,793	)	$	(6,702	)
Change in unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income	$	(5,530	)	$	(16,147	)
Cash dividends declared	$	(12,249	)	$	(8,978	)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hanmi Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Note 1 — Organization and Basis of Presentation

Hanmi Financial Corporation (“Hanmi Financial,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is a bank holding company whose subsidiary is Hanmi Bank (the “Bank”). Our primary operations are related to traditional banking activities, including the acceptance of deposits and the lending and investing of money through the operation of the Bank.

In management’s opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Hanmi Financial and its subsidiaries reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature that are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period ended June 30, 2017, but are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be reported for the entire year or any other interim period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. The aforementioned unaudited consolidated financial statements are in conformity with GAAP. Such interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The interim information should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K”).

The preparation of interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates subject to change include, among other items, the determination of allowance for loan and lease losses and various other assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

Descriptions of our significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Note 2 — Securities

The following is a summary of securities available for sale as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gain		Gross Unrealized Loss		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Mortgage-backed securities ^{(1) (2)}	$	280,494	$	767	$	1,496	$	279,765
Collateralized mortgage obligations ⁽¹⁾	92,360		14		936		91,438
U.S. government agency securities	7,499		—		42		7,457
SBA loan pool securities	4,037		—		142		3,895
Municipal bonds-tax exempt	158,614		2,567		118		161,063
Municipal bonds-taxable	531		6		—		537
Corporate bonds	5,006		16		—		5,022
U.S. treasury securities	154		—		—		154
Mutual funds	22,916		—		401		22,515
Total securities available for sale	$	571,611	$	3,370	$	3,135	$	571,846

December 31, 2016
Mortgage-backed securities ^{(1) (2)}	$	230,489	$	598	$	1,457	$	229,630
Collateralized mortgage obligations ⁽¹⁾	77,447		6		1,002		76,451
U.S. government agency securities	7,499		—		58		7,441
SBA loan pool securities	4,356		—		210		4,146
Municipal bonds-tax exempt	159,789		236		1,995		158,030
Municipal bonds-taxable	13,391		319		9		13,701
Corporate bonds	5,010		5		—		5,015
U.S. treasury securities	156		—		—		156
Mutual funds	22,916		—		522		22,394
Total securities available for sale	$	521,053	$	1,164	$	5,253	$	516,964


⁽¹⁾	Collateralized by residential mortgages and guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored entities.


⁽²⁾	Includes securities collateralized by home equity conversion mortgages with total estimated fair value of $9.1 million and $52.9 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities as of June 30, 2017, by contractual or expected maturity, are shown below. Collateralized mortgage obligations are included in the table shown below based on their expected maturities. Mutual funds do not have contractual maturities. However, they are included in the table shown below as over ten years since the Company intends to hold these securities for at least this duration. All other securities are included based on their contractual maturities.



	Available for Sale
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Within one year	$	15,692	$	15,648
Over one year through five years	59,465		59,365
Over five years through ten years	249,990		251,060
Over ten years	246,464		245,773
Total	$	571,611	$	571,846

Gross unrealized losses on securities available for sale, the estimated fair value of the related securities and the number of securities aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:



	Holding Period
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Gross Unrealized Loss		Estimated Fair Value		Number of Securities	Gross Unrealized Loss		Estimated Fair Value		Number of Securities	Gross Unrealized Loss		Estimated Fair Value		Number of Securities
	(in thousands, except number of securities)
June 30, 2017
Mortgage-backed securities	$	1,432	$	189,400	62	$	64	$	6,868	2	$	1,496	$	196,268	64
Collateralized mortgage obligations	560		67,725		30	376		18,424		12	936		86,149		42
U.S. government agency securities	42		7,457		3	—		—		—	42		7,457		3
SBA loan pool securities	—		—		—	142		3,896		2	142		3,896		2
Municipal bonds-tax exempt	118		5,128		7	—		—		—	118		5,128		7
U.S. treasury securities	—		154		1	—		—		—	—		154		1
Mutual funds	290		21,596		3	111		914		3	401		22,510		6
Total	$	2,442	$	291,460	106	$	693	$	30,102	19	$	3,135	$	321,562	125

December 31, 2016
Mortgage-backed securities	$	1,345	$	102,647	38	$	112	$	11,350	3	$	1,457	$	113,997	41
Collateralized mortgage obligations	676		60,786		27	326		10,579		7	1,002		71,365		34
U.S. government agency securities	58		7,441		3	—		—		—	58		7,441		3
SBA loan pool securities	—		—		—	210		4,146		2	210		4,146		2
Municipal bonds-tax exempt	1,995		125,004		54	—		—		—	1,995		125,004		54
Municipal bonds-taxable	9		2,904		2	—		—		—	9		2,904		2
Mutual funds	413		21,478		4	109		916		3	522		22,394		7
Total	$	4,496	$	320,260	128	$	757	$	26,991	15	$	5,253	$	347,251	143

All individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 had investment grade ratings upon purchase. The issuers of these securities have not established any cause for default on these securities and the various rating agencies have reaffirmed these securities’ long-term investment grade status as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. These securities have fluctuated in value since their purchase dates as market interest rates have fluctuated.

The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis. Interest payments have been made as scheduled, and management believes this will continue in the future and that the bonds will be repaid in full as scheduled. Therefore, in management’s opinion, all securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the past 12 months or longer as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were not other-than-temporarily impaired, and therefore, no impairment charges as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were warranted.

Realized gains and losses on sales of securities and proceeds from sales of securities were as follows for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands)
Gross realized gains on sales of securities	$	938	$	—	$	1,206	$	—
Gross realized losses on sales of securities	—		—		—		—
Net realized gains on sales of securities	$	938	$	—	$	1,206	$	—
Proceeds from sales of securities	$	40,115	$	—	$	52,688	$	—

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, there was a $938,000 net gain in earnings resulting from the sale of securities. Net unrealized gains of $430,000 related to these sold securities had previously been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of the beginning of the period. There were no sales of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2016.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, there was a $1.2 million net gain in earnings resulting from the sale of securities. Net unrealized gains of $744,000 related to these sold securities had previously been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of the beginning of the period. There were no sales of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Securities available for sale with market values of $132.3 million and $133.0 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

Note 3 — Loans and leases

Loans and Leases Receivable, Net

Loans and leases receivable consisted of the following as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017									December 31, 2016
	Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total			Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total
	(in thousands)
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	914,470		$	1,643		$	916,113		$	857,629		$	2,324		$	859,953
Hospitality	737,369			1,698			739,067			649,540			1,618			651,158
Gas station	247,566			2,363			249,929			260,187			2,692			262,879
Other ⁽¹⁾	1,102,084			2,016			1,104,100			1,107,589			2,067			1,109,656
Construction	58,159			—			58,159			55,962			—			55,962
Residential property	382,692			965			383,657			337,791			976			338,767
Total real estate loans	3,442,340			8,685			3,451,025			3,268,698			9,677			3,278,375
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	159,432			55			159,487			138,032			136			138,168
Commercial lines of credit	148,421			—			148,421			136,231			—			136,231
International loans	39,328			—			39,328			25,821			—			25,821
Total commercial and industrial loans	347,181			55			347,236			300,084			136			300,220
Leases receivable	257,525			—			257,525			243,294			—			243,294
Consumer loans ⁽²⁾	17,232			44			17,276			22,830			50			22,880
Loans and leases receivable	4,064,278			8,784			4,073,062			3,834,906			9,863			3,844,769
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(33,038		)	(720		)	(33,758		)	(31,458		)	(971		)	(32,429		)
Loans and leases receivable, net	$	4,031,240		$	8,064		$	4,039,304		$	3,803,448		$	8,892		$	3,812,340


⁽¹⁾	The remaining other real estate categories represent less than one percent of total loans and leases, which, among other property types, include mixed-use, apartment, office, industrial, faith-based facilities and warehouse.


⁽²⁾	Consumer loans include home equity lines of credit of $15.1 million and $17.7 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Accrued interest on loans and leases receivable was $8.3 million and $8.2 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, loans receivable of $1.0 billion were pledged to secure borrowing facilities from the FHLB.

Loans Held for Sale

The following is the activity for SBA loans held for sale for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:



	SBA Loans Held for Sale
	Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,789		$	1,060		$	8,849
Originations	22,130			12,344			34,474
Sales	(21,083		)	(11,271		)	(32,354		)
Principal payoffs and amortization	(19		)	(1		)	(20		)
Balance at end of period	$	8,817		$	2,132		$	10,949

June 30, 2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,824		$	759		$	2,583
Originations	22,376			8,031			30,407
Sales	(14,905		)	(5,247		)	(20,152		)
Principal payoffs and amortization	(1		)	(4		)	(5		)
Balance at end of period	$	9,294		$	3,539		$	12,833

The following is the activity for SBA loans held for sale for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:



	SBA Loans Held for Sale
	Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,410		$	1,906		$	9,316
Originations	34,763			18,904			53,667
Sales	(33,337		)	(18,660		)	(51,997		)
Principal payoffs and amortization	(19		)	(18		)	(37		)
Balance at end of period	$	8,817		$	2,132		$	10,949

June 30, 2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	840		$	2,034		$	2,874
Originations	28,849			13,710			42,559
Sales	(20,393		)	(12,182		)	(32,575		)
Principal payoffs and amortization	(2		)	(23		)	(25		)
Balance at end of period	$	9,294		$	3,539		$	12,833

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

Activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses was as follows for the periods indicated:



	As of and for the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2016
	Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total			Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total
	(in thousands)
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	32,261		$	891		$	33,152		$	35,381		$	5,645		$	41,026
Charge-offs	(665		)	—			(665		)	(662		)	(137		)	(799		)
Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off	849			—			849			995			—			995
Net loan and lease (charge-offs) recoveries	184			—			184			333			(137		)	196
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	593			(171		)	422			(1,455		)	(60		)	(1,515		)
Balance at end of period	$	33,038		$	720		$	33,758		$	34,259		$	5,448		$	39,707



	As of and for the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2016
	Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total			Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total
	(in thousands)
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	31,458		$	971		$	32,429		$	37,494		$	5,441		$	42,935
Charge-offs	(851		)	—			(851		)	(1,299		)	(137		)	(1,436		)
Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off	1,838			—			1,838			1,248			—			1,248
Net loan and lease (charge-offs) recoveries	987			—			987			(51		)	(137		)	(188		)
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	593			(251		)	342			(3,184		)	144			(3,040		)
Balance at end of period	$	33,038		$	720		$	33,758		$	34,259		$	5,448		$	39,707

Management believes the allowance for loan and lease losses is appropriate to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. However, the allowance is an estimate that is inherently uncertain and depends on the outcome of future events. Management’s estimates are based on previous loss experience; volume, growth and composition of the loan and lease portfolio; the value of collateral; and current economic conditions. Our lending is concentrated generally in real estate, commercial, SBA and trade finance lending to small and middle market businesses primarily in California, Texas and Illinois.

The following tables detail the information on the allowance for loan and lease losses by portfolio segment as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:



	Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial		Leases Receivable			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)
As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Allowance for loan and lease losses on non-PCI loans and leases:
Beginning balance	$	24,760		$	5,914	980			$	122		$	485	$	32,261
Charge-offs	(38		)	—		(627		)	—			—		(665		)
Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off	447			367		20			15			—		849
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	(2,407		)	698		1,660			(50		)	692		593
Ending balance	$	22,762		$	6,979	$	2,033		$	87		$	1,177	$	33,038
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,638		$	1,841	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	5,479
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	19,124		$	5,138	$	2,033		$	87		$	1,177	$	27,559

Non-PCI loans and leases receivable:
Ending balance	$	3,442,340		$	347,181	$	257,525		$	17,232		$	—	$	4,064,278
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	19,695		$	5,275	$	—		$	1,224		$	—	$	26,194
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,422,645		$	341,906	$	257,525		$	16,008		$	—	$	4,038,084

Allowance for loan losses on PCI loans:
Beginning balance	$	842		$	41	$	—		$	8		$	—	$	891
Charge-offs	—			—		—			—			—		—
Loan loss provision (income)	(171		)	—		—			—			—		(171		)
Ending balance	$	671		$	41	$	—		$	8		$	—	$	720

PCI loans receivable:
Ending balance: acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	8,685		$	55	$	—		$	44		$	—	$	8,784



	Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Leases Receivable				Consumer			Unallocated			Total
	(In thousands)
As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Allowance for loan and lease losses on non-PCI loans and leases:
Beginning balance	$	28,278		$	6,289		—				$	255		$	559		$	35,381
Charge-offs	(156		)	(506		)	—				—			—			(662		)
Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off	97			845			—				53			—			995
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	(103		)	(1,126		)	—				(66		)	(160		)	(1,455		)
Ending balance	$	28,116		$	5,502		$	—			$	242		$	399		$	34,259
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,589		$	422		$	—			$	—		$	—		$	3,011
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	25,527		$	5,080		$	—	$	—	$	242		$	399		$	31,248

Non-PCI loans and leases receivable:
Ending balance	$	3,116,749		$	292,927		$	—			$	24,614		$	—		$	3,434,290
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	20,412		$	5,089		$	—			$	686		$	—		$	26,187
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,096,337		$	287,838		$	—			$	23,928		$	—		$	3,408,103

Allowance for loan losses on PCI loans:
Beginning balance	$	5,599		$	44		$	—			$	2		$	—		$	5,645
Charge-offs	(137		)	—			—				—			—			(137		)
Loan loss provision (income)	(62		)	(3		)	—				5			—			(60		)
Ending balance	$	5,400		$	41		$	—			$	7		$	—		$	5,448

PCI loans receivable:
Ending balance: acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	14,823		$	146		$	—			$	51		$	—		$	15,020



	Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Leases Receivable			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)
As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Allowance for loan and lease losses on non-PCI loans and leases:
Beginning balance	$	25,212		$	5,582		307			$	191		$	166	$	31,458
Charge-offs	(142		)	(40		)	(669		)	—			—		(851		)
Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off	1,159			644			20			15			—		1,838
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	(3,467		)	793			2,375			(119		)	1,011		593
Ending balance	$	22,762		$	6,979		$	2,033		$	87		$	1,177	$	33,038
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,638		$	1,841		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	5,479
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	19,124		$	5,138		$	2,033		$	87		$	1,177	$	27,559

Non-PCI loans and leases receivable:
Ending balance	$	3,442,340		$	347,181		$	257,525		$	17,232		$	—	$	4,064,278
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	19,695		$	5,275		$	—		$	1,224		$	—	$	26,194
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,422,645		$	341,906		$	257,525		$	16,008		$	—	$	4,038,084

Allowance for loan losses on PCI loans:
Beginning balance	$	922		$	41		$	—		$	8		$	—	$	971
Charge-offs	—			—			—			—			—		—
Loan loss provision (income)	(251		)	—			—			—			—		(251		)
Ending balance	$	671		$	41		$	—		$	8		$	—	$	720

PCI loans receivable:
Ending balance: acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	8,685		$	55		$	—		$	44		$	—	$	8,784



	Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Leases Receivable		Consumer			Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)
As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Allowance for loan and lease losses on non-PCI loans and leases:
Beginning balance	$	29,800		$	7,081		—		$	242		$	371	$	37,494
Charge-offs	(691		)	(608		)	—		—			—		(1,299		)
Recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off	190			1,005			—		53			—		1,248
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	(1,183		)	(1,976		)	—		(53		)	28		(3,184		)
Ending balance	$	28,116		$	5,502		$	—	$	242		$	399	$	34,259
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,589		$	422		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	3,011
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	25,527		$	5,080		$	—	$	242		$	399	$	31,248

Non-PCI loans and leases receivable:
Ending balance	$	3,116,749		$	292,927		$	—	$	24,614		$	—	$	3,434,290
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	20,412		$	5,089		$	—	$	686		$	—	$	26,187
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,096,337		$	287,838		$	—	$	23,928		$	—	$	3,408,103

Allowance for loan losses on PCI loans:
Beginning balance	$	5,397		$	42		$	—	$	2		$	—	$	5,441
Charge-offs	(137		)	—			—		—			—		(137		)
Loan loss provision (income)	140			(1		)	—		5			—		144
Ending balance	$	5,400		$	41		$	—	$	7		$	—	$	5,448

PCI loans receivable:
Ending balance: acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	14,823		$	146		$	—	$	51		$	—	$	15,020

Loan and Lease Quality Indicators

As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of our loan and lease portfolio, we utilize an internal loan and lease grading system to identify credit risk and assign an appropriate grade, from 0 to 8, for each loan or lease in our loan and lease portfolio. Third party loan reviews are performed throughout the year. Additional adjustments are made when determined to be necessary. The loan and lease grade definitions are as follows:

Pass and Pass-Watch: Pass and pass-watch loans and leases, grades 0-4, are in compliance in all respects with the Bank’s credit policy and regulatory requirements, and do not exhibit any potential or defined weaknesses as defined under Special Mention, Substandard or Doubtful. This category is the strongest level of the Bank’s loan and lease grading system. It incorporates all performing loans and leases with no credit weaknesses. It includes cash and stock/security secured loans or other investment grade loans.

Special Mention: A special mention credit, grade 5, has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If not corrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects of the debt and result in a Substandard classification. Loans and leases that have significant actual, not potential, weaknesses are considered more severely classified.

Substandard: A substandard credit, grade 6, has a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes the liquidation of the debt. A credit graded Substandard is not protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower, or of the value and type of collateral pledged. With a Substandard loan or lease, there is a distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the weaknesses or deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: A doubtful credit, grade 7, is one that has critical weaknesses that would make the collection or liquidation of the full amount due improbable. However, there may be pending events which may work to strengthen the credit, and therefore the amount or timing of a possible loss cannot be determined at the current time.

Loss: A loan or lease classified as loss, grade 8, is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance as an active bank asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan or lease has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset even though partial recovery may be possible in the future. Loans and leases classified as loss are charged off in a timely manner.

Under regulatory guidance, loans and leases graded special mention or worse are considered criticized loans and leases, and loans and leases graded substandard or worse are considered classified loans and leases.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, pass/pass-watch, special mention and classified loans and leases (excluding PCI loans), disaggregated by loan class, were as follows:



	Pass/Pass-Watch		Special Mention		Classified		Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	909,076	$	1,601	$	3,793	$	914,470
Hospitality	724,423		5,798		7,148		737,369
Gas station	243,388		2,006		2,172		247,566
Other	1,089,244		9,483		3,357		1,102,084
Construction	58,159		—		—		58,159
Residential property	382,068		320		304		382,692
Total real estate loans	3,406,358		19,208		16,774		3,442,340
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	155,226		2,143		2,063		159,432
Commercial lines of credit	146,921		—		1,500		148,421
International loans	39,328		—		—		39,328
Total commercial and industrial loans	341,475		2,143		3,563		347,181
Leases receivable	253,881		—		3,644		257,525
Consumer loans	15,956		—		1,276		17,232
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	4,017,670	$	21,351	$	25,257	$	4,064,278

December 31, 2016
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	851,147	$	2,275	$	4,207	$	857,629
Hospitality	634,397		5,497		9,646		649,540
Gas station	252,123		1,911		6,153		260,187
Other	1,100,070		1,645		5,874		1,107,589
Construction	55,962		—		—		55,962
Residential property	337,227		—		564		337,791
Total real estate loans	3,230,926		11,328		26,444		3,268,698
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	133,811		2,060		2,161		138,032
Commercial lines of credit	135,699		464		68		136,231
International loans	23,406		2,415		—		25,821
Total commercial and industrial loans	292,916		4,939		2,229		300,084
Leases receivable	242,393		—		901		243,294
Consumer loans	22,139		—		691		22,830
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	3,788,374	$	16,267	$	30,265	$	3,834,906

The following is an aging analysis of loans and leases (excluding PCI loans), disaggregated by loan class, as of the dates indicated:



	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	128	$	138	$	143	$	409	$	914,061	$	914,470
Hospitality	1,336		999		3,797		6,132		731,237		737,369
Gas station	264		1,582		130		1,976		245,590		247,566
Other	876		433		69		1,378		1,100,706		1,102,084
Construction	—		—		—		—		58,159		58,159
Residential property	1,165		50		456		1,671		381,021		382,692
Total real estate loans	3,769		3,202		4,595		11,566		3,430,774		3,442,340
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	186		418		372		976		158,456		159,432
Commercial lines of credit	95		—		—		95		148,326		148,421
International loans	—		—		—		—		39,328		39,328
Total commercial and industrial loans	281		418		372		1,071		346,110		347,181
Leases receivable	1,983		1,787		1,971		5,741		251,784		257,525
Consumer loans	121		—		990		1,111		16,121		17,232
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	6,154	$	5,407	$	7,928	$	19,489	$	4,044,789	$	4,064,278

December 31, 2016
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	9	$	137	$	234	$	380	$	857,249	$	857,629
Hospitality	1,037		46		600		1,683		647,857		649,540
Gas station	245		643		137		1,025		259,162		260,187
Other	432		79		1,100		1,611		1,105,978		1,107,589
Construction	—		—		—		—		55,962		55,962
Residential property	730		89		423		1,242		336,549		337,791
Total real estate loans	2,453		994		2,494		5,941		3,262,757		3,268,698
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	484		42		111		637		137,395		138,032
Commercial lines of credit	—		—		—		—		136,231		136,231
International loans	80		—		—		80		25,741		25,821
Total commercial and industrial loans	564		42		111		717		299,367		300,084
Leases receivable	2,090		1,043		385		3,518		239,776		243,294
Consumer loans	170		—		—		170		22,660		22,830
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	5,277	$	2,079	$	2,990	$	10,346	$	3,824,560	$	3,834,906

There were no loans that were 90 days or more past due and accruing interest as of June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Impaired Loans and Leases

Loans and leases are considered impaired when the Bank will be unable to collect all interest and principal payments per the contractual terms of the loan and lease agreement, unless the loan is well-collateralized and in the process of collection; or they are classified as Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) because, due to the financial difficulties of the borrowers, we have granted concessions to the borrowers we would not otherwise consider; or when current information or events make it unlikely to collect in full according to the contractual terms of the loan or lease agreements; or there is a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition that raises uncertainty as to timely collection of either principal or interest; or full payment of both interest and principal is in doubt according to the original contractual terms.

We evaluate loan and lease impairment in accordance with applicable GAAP. Impaired loans and leases are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the receivable's effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the receivable's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan or lease is collateral dependent, less estimated costs to sell. If the measure of the impaired loan or lease is less than the recorded investment in the loan or lease, the deficiency is either charged off against the allowance for loan and lease losses or we establish a specific allocation in the allowance for loan and lease losses. Additionally, loans and leases that are considered impaired are specifically excluded from the quarterly migration analysis when determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses required for the period.

The allowance for collateral-dependent loans is determined by calculating the difference between the outstanding loan balance and the value of the collateral as determined by recent appraisals. The allowance for collateral-dependent loans varies from loan to loan based on the collateral coverage of the loan at the time of designation as nonperforming. We continue to monitor the collateral coverage, using recent appraisals, on these loans on a quarterly basis and adjust the allowance accordingly.

The following tables provide information on impaired loans and leases (excluding PCI loans), disaggregated by loan class, as of the dates indicated:



	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		With No Related Allowance Recorded		With an Allowance Recorded		Related Allowance
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	1,495	$	1,506	$	1,186	$	309	$	66
Hospitality	6,057		6,730		2,341		3,716		3,078
Gas station	4,828		4,991		4,828		—		—
Other	4,502		4,810		3,652		850		494
Residential property	2,813		2,837		2,813		—		—
Total real estate loans	19,695		20,874		14,820		4,875		3,638
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	3,775		3,859		1,252		2,523		651
Commercial lines of credit	1,500		1,500		—		1,500		1,190
Total commercial and industrial loans	5,275		5,359		1,252		4,023		1,841
Consumer loans	1,224		1,228		1,224		—		—
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	26,194	$	27,461	$	17,296	$	8,898	$	5,479

December 31, 2016
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	1,678	$	1,684	$	151	$	1,527	$	120
Hospitality	6,227		6,823		2,243		3,984		3,078
Gas station	4,984		5,092		4,984		—		—
Other	6,070		6,808		3,127		2,943		782
Residential property	2,798		2,851		2,798		—		—
Total real estate loans	21,757		23,258		13,303		8,454		3,980
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	4,106		4,171		1,229		2,877		347
Commercial lines of credit	68		68		68		—		—
Total commercial and industrial loans	4,174		4,239		1,297		2,877		347
Consumer loans	419		489		419		—		—
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	26,350	$	27,986	$	15,019	$	11,331	$	4,327



	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	1,500	$	29	$	1,584	$	61
Hospitality	6,074		99		6,164		167
Gas station	4,860		117		4,844		211
Other	4,532		98		4,932		187
Residential property	2,823		28		2,798		61
Total real estate loans	19,789		371		20,322		687
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	3,829		52		3,861		110
Commercial lines of credit	1,500		16		750		16
Total commercial and industrial loans	5,329		68		4,611		126
Consumer loans	1,226		3		775		6
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	26,344	$	442	$	25,708	$	819

June 30, 2016
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	2,434	$	44	$	2,653	$	85
Hospitality	3,362		146		5,032		300
Gas station	4,653		99		4,880		261
Other	7,525		183		7,887		395
Residential property	2,537		27		2,653		57
Total real estate loans	20,511		499		23,105		1,098
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	5,089		87		5,151		164
Commercial lines of credit	28		4		37		9
International loans	—		—		630		—
Total commercial and industrial loans	5,117		91		5,818		173
Consumer loans	690		8		692		16
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	26,318	$	598	$	29,615	$	1,287

The following is a summary of interest foregone on impaired loans and leases (excluding PCI loans) for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
	(in thousands)
Interest income that would have been recognized had impaired loans and leases performed in accordance with their original terms	$	622		$	718		$	1,213		$	1,611
Less: Interest income recognized on impaired loans and leases	(442		)	(598		)	(819		)	(1,287		)
Interest foregone on impaired loans and leases	$	180		$	120		$	394		$	324

There were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans are included in the table above.

Nonaccrual Loans and Leases and Nonperforming Assets

Loans and leases are placed on nonaccrual status when, in the opinion of management, the full timely collection of principal or interest is in doubt. Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued when principal or interest payments become more than 90 days past due, unless management believes the receivable is adequately collateralized and in the process of collection. However, in certain instances, we may place a particular loan or lease receivable on nonaccrual status earlier, depending upon the individual circumstances surrounding the delinquency. When a receivable is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed against current income. Subsequent collections of cash are applied as principal reductions when received, except when the ultimate collectability of principal is probable, in which case interest payments are credited to income. Nonaccrual loans and leases may be restored to accrual status when principal and interest payments become current and full repayment is expected.

The following table details nonaccrual loans and leases (excluding PCI loans), disaggregated by loan class, as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(in thousands)
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	210	$	404
Hospitality	5,199		5,266
Gas station	945		1,025
Other	1,990		2,033
Residential property	667		564
Total real estate loans	9,011		9,292
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	1,199		824
Commercial lines of credit	1,500		—
Total commercial and industrial loans	2,699		824
Leases receivable	3,644		901
Consumer loans	1,110		389
Total nonaccrual Non-PCI loans and leases	$	16,464	$	11,406

The following table details nonperforming assets (excluding PCI loans) as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(in thousands)
Nonaccrual Non-PCI loans and leases	$	16,464	$	11,406
Loans and leases 90 days or more past due and still accruing	—		—
Total nonperforming Non-PCI loans and leases	16,464		11,406
OREO	4,321		7,484
Total nonperforming assets	$	20,785	$	18,890

As of June 30, 2017, OREO consisted of seven properties with a combined carrying value of $4.3 million, six of which with a combined carrying value of $4.2 million were acquired in the Central Bancorp Inc. ("CBI") acquisition on August 31, 2014, or were obtained as a result of PCI loan collateral foreclosures subsequent to the acquisition date. As of December 31, 2016, OREO consisted of 12 properties with a combined carrying value of $7.5 million, including $5.7 million OREO acquired in the CBI acquisition or obtained as a result of PCI loan collateral foreclosures subsequent to the acquisition date.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The following table details TDRs (excluding PCI loans) as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:



	Nonaccrual TDRs										Accrual TDRs
	Deferral of Principal		Deferral of Principal and Interest		Reduction of Principal and Interest		Extension of Maturity		Total		Deferral of Principal		Deferral of Principal and Interest		Reduction of Principal and Interest		Extension of Maturity		Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans	$	2,083	$	3,989	$	69	$	—	$	6,141	$	3,772	$	—	$	1,255	$	1,255	$	6,282
Commercial and industrial loans	139		67		352		385		943		14		189		1,709		540		2,452
Consumer loans	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		114		—		114
Total Non-PCI TDR loans	$	2,222	$	4,056	$	421	$	385	$	7,084	$	3,786	$	189	$	3,078	$	1,795	$	8,848

December 31, 2016
Real estate loans	$	1,679	$	4,373	$	143	$	—	$	6,195	$	4,795	$	—	$	1,514	$	1,633	$	7,942
Commercial and industrial loans	149		71		69		419		708		22		198		2,135		730		3,085
Consumer loans	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		119		—		119
Total Non-PCI TDR loans	$	1,828	$	4,444	$	212	$	419	$	6,903	$	4,817	$	198	$	3,768	$	2,363	$	11,146

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, total TDRs were $15.9 million and $18.0 million, respectively. A debt restructuring is considered a TDR if we grant a concession, that we would not have otherwise considered to the borrower, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties. Loans are considered to be TDRs if they were restructured through payment structure modifications such as reducing the amount of principal and interest due monthly and/or allowing for interest only monthly payments for three months or more. All TDRs are impaired and are individually evaluated for specific impairment using one of these three criteria: (1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (2) the loan’s observable market price; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $3.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of allowance relating to these loans were included in the allowance for loan and lease losses.

For the restructured loans on accrual status, we determined that, based on the financial capabilities of the borrowers at the time of the loan restructuring and the borrowers’ past performance in the payment of debt service under the previous loan terms, performance and collection under the revised terms are probable.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, there was one commercial term loan with recorded investment of $55,000 that defaulted subsequent to the modifications occurring within the previous 12 months. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, there was one commercial real estate loan with recorded investment of $399,000 and two commercial term loans with combined recorded investment of $85,000 that defaulted subsequent to the modifications occurring within the previous 12 months. There were no such defaults during the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2017.

Purchased Credit Impaired Loans

The following table summarizes the changes in carrying value of PCI loans during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:



	Carrying Amount			Accretable Yield
	(in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2017	$	8,892		$	(5,677	)
Accretion	317			317
Payments received	(1,434		)	—
Disposal/transfer to OREO	37			—
Change in expected cash flows, net	—			121
Loan loss (provision) income	252			—
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	8,064		$	(5,239	)

Balance at January 1, 2016	$	14,573		$	(5,944	)
Accretion	753			753
Payments received	(6,713		)	—
Disposal/transfer to OREO	1,103			—
Change in expected cash flows, net	—			683
Loan loss (provision) income	(144		)	—
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	9,572		$	(4,508	)

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, pass/pass-watch, special mention and classified PCI loans, disaggregated by loan class, were as follows:



	Pass/Pass-Watch		Special Mention		Classified		Total		Allowance		Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans	$	1,243	$	1,108	$	6,334	$	8,685	$	658	$	8,027
Commercial and industrial loans	—		—		55		55		41		14
Consumer loans	—		—		44		44		21		23
Total PCI loans	$	1,243	$	1,108	$	6,433	$	8,784	$	720	$	8,064

December 31, 2016
Real estate loans	$	1,153	$	1,180	$	7,344	$	9,677	$	922	$	8,755
Commercial and industrial loans	—		—		136		136		41		95
Consumer loans	—		—		50		50		8		42
Total PCI loans	$	1,153	$	1,180	$	7,530	$	9,863	$	971	$	8,892

Loans accounted for as PCI are generally considered accruing and performing loans as the accretable discount is accreted to interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably estimable. Accordingly, PCI loans that are contractually past due are still considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of future cash flows is not reasonably estimable, the loans are classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income is not recognized until the timing and amount of future cash flows can be reasonably estimated. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had no PCI loans on nonaccrual status and included in the delinquency table below.

The following table presents a summary of the borrowers' underlying payment status of PCI loans as of the dates indicated:



	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total		Allowance Amount		Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans	$	349	$	—	$	425	$	774	$	7,911	$	8,685	$	658	$	8,027
Commercial and industrial loans	—		—		5		5		50		55		41		14
Consumer loans	—		—		39		39		5		44		21		23
Total PCI loans	$	349	$	—	$	469	$	818	$	7,966	$	8,784	$	720	$	8,064

December 31, 2016
Real estate loans	$	975	$	—	$	361	$	1,336	$	8,341	$	9,677	$	922	$	8,755
Commercial and industrial loans	—		—		6		6		130		136		41		95
Consumer loans	—		—		50		50		—		50		8		42
Total PCI loans	$	975	$	—	$	417	$	1,392	$	8,471	$	9,863	$	971	$	8,892

Below is a summary of PCI loans as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:



	Pooled PCI Loans							Non-pooled PCI Loans
	Number of Loans	Number of Pools	Carrying Amount (in thousands)			Percentage of Total		Number of Loans	Carrying Amount (in thousands)			Percentage of Total		Total PCI Loans (in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans:
Commercial property	41	6	$	6,837		88.6	%	1	$	883		11.4	%	$	7,720
Residential property	—	—	—			—	%	1	965			100.0	%	$	965
Total real estate loans	41	6	6,837			78.7	%	2	1,848			21.3	%	8,685
Commercial and industrial loans	3	3	55			100.0	%	—	—			—	%	55
Consumer loans	1	1	5			11.4	%	1	39			88.6	%	44
Total acquired loans	45	10	6,897			78.5	%	3	1,887			21.5	%	8,784
Allowance for loan losses			(355		)				(365		)			(720		)
Total carrying amount			$	6,542					$	1,522				$	8,064



	Pooled PCI Loans							Non-pooled PCI Loans
	Number of Loans	Number of Pools	Carrying Amount (in thousands)			Percentage of Total		Number of Loans	Carrying Amount (in thousands)			Percentage of Total		Total PCI Loans (in thousands)
December 31, 2016
Real estate loans:
Commercial property	45	6	$	7,780		89.4	%	1	$	921		10.6	%	$	8,701
Residential property	—	—	—			—	%	2	976			100.0	%	$	976
Total real estate loans	45	6	7,780			80.4	%	3	1,897			19.6	%	9,677
Commercial and industrial loans	6	3	136			100.0	%	—	—			—	%	136
Consumer loans	1	1	50			100.0	%	—	—			—	%	50
Total acquired loans	52	10	7,966			80.8	%	3	1,897			19.2	%	9,863
Allowance for loan losses			(617		)				(354		)			(971		)
Total carrying amount			$	7,349					$	1,543				$	8,892

Note 4 — Servicing Assets and Liabilities

The changes in servicing assets and liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:



	2017			2016
	(in thousands)
Servicing assets:
Balance at beginning of period	$	10,564		$	11,744
Addition related to sale of SBA loans	1,194			863
Amortization	(1,608		)	(1,270		)
Reversal of allowance	330			—
Balance at end of period	$	10,480		$	11,337

Servicing liabilities:
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,143		$	4,784
Amortization	(523		)	(863		)
Reversal of allowance	(67		)	—
Balance at end of period	$	2,553		$	3,921

At June 30, 2017 and 2016, we serviced loans sold to unaffiliated parties in the amounts of $477.3 million and $481.4 million, respectively. These represented loans that have been sold for which the Bank continues to provide servicing. These loans are maintained off balance sheet and are not included in the loans receivable balance. All of the loans serviced were SBA loans.

The Company recorded servicing fee income of $1.2 million for each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and $2.4 million and $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Servicing fee income, net of amortization of servicing assets and liabilities, is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of income. Net amortization expense was $658,000 and $52,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $1.1 million and $407,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Note 5 — Income Taxes

The Company’s income tax expense was $9.1 million and $8.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective income tax rate was 38.5 percent for both the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company’s income tax expense was $17.7 million and $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective income tax rate was 38.5 percent and 34.2 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 includes a $1.8 million tax benefit recorded as a result of finalization of the Company's 2014 amended income tax returns.

Management concluded that as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, a valuation allowance of $1.0 million was appropriate against certain state net operating losses.

The Company is subject to examination by various federal and state tax authorities for the years ended December 31, 2008 through 2016. As of June 30, 2017, the Company was subject to audit or examination by Internal Revenue Service for the 2014 tax year and California Franchise Tax Board for the 2008 and 2009 tax years. Management does not anticipate any material changes in our financial statements as a result of these audits or examinations.

Note 6 — Debt

FHLB Borrowings

The Bank had $20.0 million and $315.0 million in advances (borrowings) from the FHLB as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The FHLB advances were all overnight borrowings at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, interest expense on FHLB advances was $49,000 and $299,000,

respectively, and the weighted-average interest rate was 0.98 percent and 0.43 percent, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, interest expense on FHLB advances was $517,000 and $494,000, respectively, and the weighted-average interest rate was 0.72 percent and 0.43 percent, respectively.

The Bank maintains a secured credit facility with the FHLB, allowing the Bank to borrow on an overnight and term basis. The Bank had $1.0 billion of loans pledged as collateral with the FHLB, which provides $756.5 million in borrowing capacity, of which $736.5 million remained available at June 30, 2017.

The Bank also has securities with market values of $9.7 million pledged with the FRB, which provides $9.5 million in available borrowing capacity through the Fed Discount Window. There were no outstanding borrowings with the FRB as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Subordinated Debentures

The Company issued Fixed-to-Floating Subordinated Notes (“Notes”) of $100 million on March 21, 2017, with a final maturity on March 30, 2027. The Notes will bear interest at an initial fixed rate of 5.45% per annum, payable semi-monthly on March 30 and September 30 of each year, commencing September 30, 2017. From and including March 30, 2022 and thereafter, the Notes will bear interest at a floating rate equal to the then current three-month LIBOR, as calculated on each applicable date of determination, plus 3.315% payable quarterly. If the then current three-month LIBOR is less than zero, three-month LIBOR will be deemed to be zero. Debt issuance cost was $2.3 million, which is being amortized through the Note's maturity date. At June 30, 2017, the balance of Notes included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet, net of debt issuance cost, was $97.9 million. The amortization of debt issuance cost was $43,000 and $47,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

The Company assumed Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (“Subordinated Debentures”) as a result of the acquisition of CBI with an unpaid principal balance of $26.8 million and an estimated fair value of $18.5 million. The $8.3 million discount is being amortized to interest expense through the debentures' maturity date of March 15, 2036. CBI formed a trust in 2005 and issued $26.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities (“TPS”) at 6.26 percent fixed rate for the first five years and a variable rate at the 3 month LIBOR plus 140 basis points thereafter and invested the proceeds in the Subordinated Debentures. The Company may redeem the Subordinated Debentures at an earlier date if certain conditions are met. The TPS will be subject to mandatory redemption if the Subordinated Debentures are repaid by the Company. Interest is payable quarterly, and the Company has the option to defer interest payments on the Subordinated Debentures from time to time for a period not to exceed five consecutive years. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance of Subordinated Debentures included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, net of discount of $7.7 million and $7.8 million, was $19.1 million and $19.0 million, respectively. The amortization of discount was $81,000 and $62,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and $158,000 and $118,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Note 7 — Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated on both a basic and a diluted basis. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings, excluding common shares in treasury.

For diluted EPS, weighted-average number of common shares included the impact of restricted stock under the treasury method. Unvested restricted stock containing rights to non-forfeitable dividends are considered participating securities prior to vesting and have been included in the earnings allocation in computing basic and diluted EPS under the two-class method. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income, net of income allocated to participating securities, by the weighted-average number of common shares. For diluted EPS, weighted-average number of common shares include the diluted effect of stock options.

The following table is a reconciliation of the components used to derive basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except for share and per share data)
Basic EPS:
Net income	$	14,457	$	14,148	$	28,240	$	28,952
Less: income allocated to unvested restricted shares	93		98		177		178
Income allocated to common shares	$	14,364	$	14,050	$	28,063	$	28,774
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS	32,078,038		31,882,489		32,040,113		31,864,427
Basic EPS	$	0.45	$	0.44	$	0.88	$	0.90

Effect of dilutive securities - options and unvested restricted stock	164,996		147,421		176,558		136,736

Diluted EPS:
Income allocated to common shares	$	14,364	$	14,050	$	28,063	$	28,774
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS	32,243,034		32,029,910		32,216,671		32,001,163
Diluted EPS	$	0.45	$	0.44	$	0.87	$	0.90

There were no stock options with an anti-dilutive effect for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, 52,332 and 90,875 stock options, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because their effect was anti-dilutive.

Note 8 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:



	Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available for Sale Securities			Unrealized Gains and Losses on Interest-Only Strip			Tax Benefit (Expense)			Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Balance at beginning of period	$	(2,737	)	$	—		$	1,134		$	(1,603	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification	3,910			—			(1,232		)	2,678
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income	(938		)	—			—			(938		)
Period change	2,972			—			(1,232		)	1,740
Balance at end of period	$	235		$	—		$	(98	)	$	137

June 30, 2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,392		$	9		$	(2,037	)	$	5,364
Other comprehensive income (loss)	6,424			(9		)	(2,658		)	3,757
Balance at end of period	$	13,816		$	—		$	(4,695	)	$	9,121

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, there was a $938,000 reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to gains in earnings resulting from the sale of available-for-sale securities. The $938,000 reclassification adjustment out of accumulated other comprehensive income was included in net gain on sales of securities under noninterest income. Net unrealized gains of $430,000 related to these sold securities had previously been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of the beginning of the period. There was no sale of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:



	Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available for Sale Securities			Unrealized Gains and Losses on Interest-Only Strip			Tax Benefit (Expense)			Total
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Balance at beginning of period	$	(4,089	)	$	—		$	1,695		$	(2,394	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassification	5,530			—			(1,793		)	3,737
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income	(1,206		)	—			—			(1,206		)
Period change	4,324			—			(1,793		)	2,531
Balance at end of period	$	235		$	—		$	(98	)	$	137

June 30, 2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	(2,331	)	$	9		$	2,007		$	(315	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	16,147			(9		)	(6,702		)	9,436
Balance at end of period	$	13,816		$	—		$	(4,695	)	$	9,121

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, there was a $1.2 million reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to gains in earnings resulting from the sale of available-for-sale securities. The $1.2 million reclassification adjustment out of accumulated other comprehensive income was included in net gain on sales of securities under noninterest income. Net unrealized gains of $744,000 related to these sold securities had previously been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of the beginning of the period. There was no sale of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Note 9 — Regulatory Matters

Risk-Based Capital

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC approved the Basel III regulatory capital framework and related changes under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The rules revise minimum capital requirements and adjust prompt corrective action thresholds. The rules also revise the regulatory capital elements, add a new common equity Tier I capital ratio, and increase the minimum Tier I capital ratio requirement. The revisions permit banking organizations to retain, through a one-time election, the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income. Basel III rules, including certain transitional provisions, became effective January 1, 2015, and its requirements are included in the capital ratios presented in the table shown below.

In addition, a new capital conservation buffer of 2.5% began to be phased in effective January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2019, and must be met to avoid limitations on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends, repurchase shares or pay discretionary bonuses. In January 2016, the new capital conservation buffer requirement was 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each year until fully implemented in January 2019. The Company and the Bank's capital conservation buffer was 6.58% and 7.44%, respectively, as of June 30, 2017, and 5.86% and 5.64%, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.

The capital ratios of Hanmi Financial and the Bank as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:



	Actual				Minimum Regulatory Requirement				Minimum to Be Categorized as “Well Capitalized”
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	669,476	15.69	%	$	341,429	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	659,526	15.44	%	$	341,689	8.00	%	$	427,111	10.00	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	536,708	12.58	%	$	256,072	6.00	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	624,633	14.62	%	$	256,267	6.00	%	$	341,689	8.00	%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	521,442	12.22	%	$	192,054	4.50	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	624,633	14.62	%	$	192,200	4.50	%	$	277,622	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	536,708	11.08	%	$	193,732	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	624,633	12.89	%	$	193,822	4.00	%	$	242,278	5.00	%

December 31, 2016
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	554,089	13.86	%	$	319,901	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	544,759	13.64	%	$	319,520	8.00	%	$	399,399	10.00	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	520,477	13.02	%	$	239,926	6.00	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	511,146	12.80	%	$	239,640	6.00	%	$	319,520	8.00	%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	509,239	12.73	%	$	179,944	4.50	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	511,146	12.80	%	$	179,730	4.50	%	$	259,610	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets):
Hanmi Financial	$	520,477	11.53	%	$	180,581	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
Hanmi Bank	$	511,146	11.33	%	$	180,411	4.00	%	$	225,514	5.00	%

Note 10 — Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value including a three-level valuation hierarchy, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The three-level fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are defined as follows:


•	Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.


•	Level 2 - Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.


•	Level 3 - Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Fair value is used on a recurring basis for certain assets and liabilities in which fair value is the primary basis of accounting. Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to evaluate assets or liabilities for impairment or for disclosure purposes.

We record securities available for sale at fair value on a recurring basis. Certain other assets, such as loans held for sale, impaired loans, OREO, and core deposit intangible, are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Non-recurring fair value measurements typically involve assets that are periodically evaluated for impairment and for which any impairment is recorded in the period in which the re-measurement is performed.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument below:

Securities available for sale - The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities, or other model-based valuation techniques requiring observable inputs other than quoted prices such as yield curve, prepayment speeds, and default rates. Level 1 securities include U.S. treasury securities and mutual funds that are traded on an active exchange or by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. The fair value of these securities is determined by quoted prices on an active exchange or over-the-counter market. Level 2 securities primarily include mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, U.S. government agency securities, SBA loan pool securities, municipal bonds and corporate bonds in markets that are active. In determining the fair value of the securities categorized as Level 2, we obtain reports from nationally recognized broker-dealers detailing the fair value of each investment security held as of each reporting date. The broker-dealers use prices obtained from nationally recognized pricing services to value our fixed income securities. The fair value of the municipal securities is determined based on pricing data provided by nationally recognized pricing services. We review the prices obtained for reasonableness based on our understanding of the marketplace, and also consider any credit issues related to the bonds. As we have not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided to us and as they are based on observable market data, they have been categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 securities are instruments that are not traded in the market. As such, no observable market data for the instrument is available, which necessitates the use of significant unobservable inputs.

Loans held for sale - Loans held for sale are all SBA loans and carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Management obtains quotes, bids or pricing indication sheets on all or part of these loans directly from the purchasing financial institutions. Premiums received or to be received on the quotes, bids or pricing indication sheets are indicative of the fact that cost is lower than fair value. At June 30, 2017, the entire balance of SBA loans held for sale was recorded at its cost. We record SBA loans held for sale on a nonrecurring basis with Level 2 inputs.

Impaired loans (excluding PCI loans) - Nonaccrual loans and performing restructured loans are considered impaired for reporting purposes and are measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Nonaccrual Non-PCI loans with an unpaid principal balance over $100,000 and all performing restructured loans are reviewed individually for the amount of impairment, if any. Nonaccrual Non-PCI loans with an unpaid principal balance of $100,000 or less are evaluated for impairment collectively. The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral dependent impaired loans are recorded based on either the current appraised value of the collateral, a Level 2 measurement, or management’s judgment and estimation of value reported on older appraisals that are then adjusted based on recent market trends, a Level 3 measurement.

OREO - Fair value of OREO is based primarily on third party appraisals, less costs to sell and result in a Level 2 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Appraisals are required annually and may be updated more frequently as circumstances require and the fair value adjustments are made to OREO based on the updated appraised value of the property.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Observable Inputs with No Active Market with Identical Characteristics		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Balance
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	279,765	$	—	$	279,765
Collateralized mortgage obligations	—		91,438		—		91,438
U.S. government agency securities	—		7,457		—		7,457
SBA loan pools securities	—		3,895		—		3,895
Municipal bonds-tax exempt	—		161,063		—		161,063
Municipal bonds-taxable	—		537		—		537
Corporate bonds	—		5,022		—		5,022
U.S. treasury securities	154		—		—		154
Mutual funds	22,515		—		—		22,515
Total securities available for sale	$	22,669	$	549,177	$	—	$	571,846

December 31, 2016
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	229,630	$	—	$	229,630
Collateralized mortgage obligations	—		76,451		—		76,451
U.S. government agency securities	—		7,441		—		7,441
SBA loan pools securities	—		4,146		—		4,146
Municipal bonds-tax exempt	—		158,030		—		158,030
Municipal bonds-taxable	—		13,701		—		13,701
Corporate bonds	—		5,015		—		5,015
U.S. treasury securities	156		—		—		156
Mutual funds	22,394		—		—		22,394
Total securities available for sale	$	22,550	$	494,414	$	—	$	516,964

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are as follows:



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Observable Inputs With No Active Market With Identical Characteristics		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Loss During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Assets:
Impaired loans (excluding PCI loans) ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	3,811	$	2,157	$	1,379
OREO ⁽²⁾	—		4,321		—		—

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Observable Inputs With No Active Market With Identical Characteristics		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Loss During the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016
	(in thousands)
December 31, 2016
Assets:
Impaired loans (excluding PCI loans) ⁽³⁾	$	—	$	15,257	$	6,767	$	868
OREO ⁽⁴⁾	—		7,484		—		—


⁽¹⁾	Consist of real estate loans of $3.8 million and commercial and industrial loans of $2.2 million.


⁽²⁾	Consist of properties obtained from the foreclosure of commercial property loans of $2.6 million and residential property loans of $1.7 million.


⁽³⁾	Consist of real estate loans of $17.8 million, commercial and industrial loans of $3.8 million, and consumer loans of $419,000.


⁽⁴⁾	Consist of properties obtained from the foreclosure of commercial property loans of $5.4 million and residential property loans of $2.1 million.

ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis are discussed above.

The estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data in order to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows:



	June 30, 2017
	Carrying	Fair Value
	Amount	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
	(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	138,507	138,507	—	—
Securities available for sale	571,846	22,669	549,177	—
Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease losses	4,039,304	—	—	3,989,950
Loans held for sale	10,949	—	10,949	—
Accrued interest receivable	11,167	11,167	—	—
FHLB stock	16,385	—	16,385	—
Financial liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	1,260,929	—	1,260,929	—
Interest-bearing deposits	2,998,244	—	—	2,965,188
Borrowings	137,011	—	—	137,011
Accrued interest payable	3,432	3,432	—	—
Off-balance sheet items:
Commitments to extend credit	313,290	—	—	313,290
Standby letters of credit	19,249	—	—	19,249
Commercial letters of credit	14,890	—	—	14,890



	December 31, 2016
	Carrying		Fair Value
	Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	147,235	$	147,235	$	—	$	—
Securities available for sale	516,964		22,550		494,414		—
Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease losses	3,812,340		—		—		3,789,579
Loans held for sale	9,316		—		9,316		—
Accrued interest receivable	10,987		10,987		—		—
FHLB stock	16,385		—		16,385		—
Financial liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	1,203,240		—		1,203,240		—
Interest-bearing deposits	2,606,497		—		—		2,541,929
Borrowings	333,978		—		—		333,978
Accrued interest payable	2,567		2,567		—		—
Off-balance sheet items:
Commitments to extend credit	310,987		—		—		310,987
Standby letters of credit	15,669		—		—		15,669
Commercial letters of credit	4,215		—		—		4,215

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it was practicable to estimate that value are explained below:

Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments (Level 1).

Securities - The fair value of securities, consisting of securities available for sale, is generally obtained from market bids for similar or identical securities, from independent securities brokers or dealers, or from other model-based valuation techniques described above (Levels 1, 2 and 3).

Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and leases losses - Loans and leases receivable include Non-PCI loans and leases, PCI loans and Non-PCI impaired loans. The fair value of Non-PCI loans and leases receivable is estimated based on the discounted cash flow approach. The discount rate was derived from the associated yield curve plus spreads and reflects the offering rates offered by the Bank for loans and leases with similar financial characteristics. Yield curves are constructed by product type using the Bank’s loan and lease pricing model for like-quality credits. The discount rates used in the Bank’s model represent the rates the Bank would offer to current borrowers for like-quality credits. These rates could be different from what other financial institutions could offer for these loans and leases. No adjustments have been made for changes in credit within the loan and lease portfolio. It is our opinion that the allowance for loan and lease losses relating to performing and nonperforming loans and leases results in a fair valuation of such loans and leases. Additionally, the fair value of our loans and leases may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such loans and leases and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize (Level 3).

The fair value of PCI loans receivable was estimated based on discounted expected cash flows. Increases in expected cash flows and improvements in the timing of cash flows over those previously estimated increase the amount of accretable yield and are recognized as an increase in yield and interest income prospectively. Decreases in the amount and delays in the timing of expected cash flows compared to those previously estimated decrease the amount of accretable yield and usually result in a provision for loan losses and the establishment of an allowance for loan losses (Level 3).

The fair value of impaired loans (excluding PCI loans) is estimated based on the net realizable fair value of the collateral or the observable market price of the most recent sale or quoted price from loans held for sale. The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral dependent impaired loans are recorded based on the current appraised value of the collateral (Level 3).

Loans held for sale - Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair market value, as determined based upon quotes, bids or sales contract prices, or as may be assessed based upon the fair value of the collateral which is obtained from recent real estate appraisals (Level 2). Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustment is typically significant and results in Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Accrued interest receivable - The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value (Level 1).

FHLB stock - The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates its fair value as such stock may be resold to the issuer at carrying value (Level 2).

Noninterest-bearing deposits - The fair value of noninterest-bearing deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (Level 2).

Interest-bearing deposits - The fair value of interest-bearing deposits, such as savings accounts, money market checking, and certificates of deposit, is estimated based on discounted cash flows. The cash flows for non-maturity deposits, including savings accounts and money market checking, are estimated based on their historical decaying experiences. The discount rate used for fair valuation is based on interest rates currently being offered by the Bank on comparable deposits as to amount and term (Level 3).

Borrowings - Borrowings consist of FHLB advances, subordinated debentures and other borrowings. Discounted cash flows based on current market rates for borrowings with similar remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of borrowings (Level 3).

Accrued interest payable - The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value (Level 1).

Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit - The fair values of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are based upon the difference between the current value of similar loans and the price at which the Bank has committed to make the loans (Level 3).

Note 11 — Share-Based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation Expense

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, share-based compensation expenses were $670,000 and $923,000, respectively, and net tax benefits recognized from stock option and restricted stock awards were $274,000 and $366,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, share-based compensation expenses were $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and net tax benefits recognized from stock option exercises and restricted stock awards were $550,000 and $604,000, respectively.

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation, during the three months ended March 30, 2016. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. As a result of adoption of this ASU, excess tax benefits related to the Company's share-based compensation were recognized as income tax expense in the consolidated statement of income during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Unrecognized Share-Based Compensation Expense

As of June 30, 2017, unrecognized share-based compensation expense was as follows:



	Unrecognized Expense		Average Expected Recognition Period
	(in thousands)
Stock option awards	$	32	0.8 years
Restricted stock awards	5,170		2.3 years
Total unrecognized share-based compensation expense	$	5,202	2.3 years

Stock Option Awards

The table below provides stock option information for the three months ended June 30, 2017:



	Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value of In-the- Money Options
						(in thousands)
Options outstanding at beginning of period	386,901		$	17.53	6.5 years	$	5,116	⁽¹⁾
Options exercised	(10,500	)	$	12.13	4.6 years	—
Options outstanding at end of period	376,401		$	17.68	6.3 years	$	4,168	⁽²⁾

Options exercisable at end of period	357,730		$	17.45	6.3 years	$	4,042	⁽²⁾


⁽¹⁾	Intrinsic value represents the excess of the closing stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was $30.75 as of March 31, 2017, over the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options.


⁽²⁾	Intrinsic value represents the excess of the closing stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was $28.75 as of June 30, 2017, over the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options.

The table below provides stock option information for the six months ended June 30, 2017:



	Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value of In-the- Money Options
						(in thousands)
Options outstanding at beginning of period	387,901		$	17.49	6.8 years	$	6,752	⁽¹⁾
Options exercised	(11,500	)	$	12.16	4.7 years	—
Options outstanding at end of period	376,401		$	17.68	6.3 years	$	4,168	⁽²⁾

Options exercisable at end of period	357,730		$	17.45	6.3 years	$	4,042	⁽²⁾


⁽¹⁾	Intrinsic value represents the excess of the closing stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was $34.90 as of December 31, 2016, over the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options.


⁽²⁾	Intrinsic value represents the excess of the closing stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was $28.75 as of June 30, 2017, over the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options.

There were 10,500 and 18,000 stock options exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. There were 11,500 and 40,209 stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards under the Company’s 2007 and 2013 Equity Compensation Plans typically vest over three years and are subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the lapse of restrictions. Hanmi Financial becomes entitled to an income tax deduction in an amount equal to the taxable income reported by the holders of the restricted shares when the restrictions are released and the shares are issued. Forfeited shares of restricted stock become available for future grants upon forfeiture.

The table below provides information for restricted stock awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017:



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017				Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share		Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Restricted stock at beginning of period	336,455		$	20.39	343,958		$	16.60
Restricted stock granted	3,761		28.91		91,006		31.36
Restricted stock vested	(30,430	)	22.62		(119,344	)	18.07
Restricted stock forfeited	(3,835	)	25.25		(9,669	)	23.26
Restricted stock at end of period	305,951		20.21		305,951		20.21

Note 12 — Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk similar to the risk involved with on-balance sheet items recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Bank’s exposure to losses in the event of non-performance by the other party to commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by

the Bank upon extension of credit, was based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, premises and equipment, and income-producing or borrower-occupied properties.

The following table shows the distribution of undisbursed loan commitments as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	313,290	$	310,987
Standby letters of credit	19,249		15,669
Commercial letters of credit	14,890		4,215
Total undisbursed loan commitments	$	347,429	$	330,871

The allowance for off-balance sheet items is maintained at a level believed to be sufficient to absorb probable losses related to these unfunded credit facilities. The determination of the allowance adequacy is based on periodic evaluations of the unfunded credit facilities including an assessment of the probability of commitment usage, credit risk factors for loans outstanding to these same customers, and the terms and expiration dates of the unfunded credit facilities. Net adjustments to the allowance for off-balance sheet items are included in other operating expenses. Activity in the allowance for loan off-balance sheet items was as follows for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016		2017			2016
	(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,184		$	1,220	$	1,184		$	986
Provision (income)	(49		)	255		(49		)	489
Balance at end of period	$	1,135		$	1,475	$	1,135		$	1,475

Note 13 — Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the financial data included herein. There have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017, or would be required to be recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) as of June 30, 2017.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the major factors that influenced our results of operations and financial condition as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. This analysis should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K”) and with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017 (this “Report”).

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements under this item and elsewhere in this Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements in this Report other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, statements about anticipated future operating and financial performance, financial position and liquidity, business strategies, regulatory and competitive outlook, investment and expenditure plans, capital and financing needs and availability, developments regarding our capital plans, plans and objectives of management for future operations, strategic alternatives for a possible business combination, merger or sale transactions, and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation and statements of assumption underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statement. These factors include the following: failure to maintain adequate levels of capital and liquidity to support our operations; the effect of potential future supervisory action against us or Hanmi Bank; general economic and business conditions internationally, nationally and in those areas in which we operate, including, but not limited to, California, Illinois and Texas; volatility and deterioration in the credit and equity markets; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; availability of capital from private and government sources; demographic changes; competition for loans and deposits and failure to attract or retain loans and deposits; fluctuations in interest rates and a decline in the level of our interest rate spread; risks of natural disasters related to our real estate portfolio; risks associated with Small Business Administration ("SBA") loans; failure to attract or retain key employees; changes in governmental regulation; enforcement actions against us and litigation we may become a party to; ability of Hanmi Bank to make distributions to Hanmi Financial, which is restricted by certain factors, including Hanmi Bank's retained earnings, net income, prior distributions made, and certain other financial tests; ability to successfully and efficiently integrate the operations of banks and other institutions we acquire; adequacy of our allowance for loan and lease losses; credit quality and the effect of credit quality on our provision for loan and lease losses and allowance for loan and lease losses; changes in the financial performance and/or condition of our borrowers and the ability of our borrowers to perform under the terms of their loans and leases and other terms of credit agreements; our ability to control expenses; and changes in securities markets. In addition, for a discussion of some of the other factors that might cause such a difference, see the discussion contained in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as other factors we identify from time to time in our filings with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date, on which such statements were made, except as required by law.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have established various accounting policies that govern the application of GAAP in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We had no significant changes in our accounting policies since the filing of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain accounting policies require us to make significant estimates and assumptions that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we consider these critical accounting policies. For a description of these critical accounting policies, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies” in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We use estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and our results of operations for the reporting periods. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of Hanmi Financial’s Board of Directors.

Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain selected financial data for the periods indicated:



	As of or for the
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
	(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Summary balance sheets:
Cash and due from banks	$	138,507		$	156,632		$	138,507		$	156,632
Securities	571,846			636,275			571,846			636,275
Loans and leases receivable ⁽¹⁾	4,039,304			3,409,603			4,039,304			3,409,603
Assets	4,973,346			4,441,333			4,973,346			4,441,333
Deposits	4,259,173			3,589,289			4,259,173			3,589,289
Liabilities	4,423,206			3,916,148			4,423,206			3,916,148
Stockholders’ equity	550,140			525,185			550,140			525,185
Tangible equity	537,428			523,648			537,428			523,648
Average loans and leases receivable ⁽¹⁾	3,951,934			3,328,416			3,917,004			3,260,625
Average securities	585,384			657,756			556,129			670,063
Average interest-earning assets	4,601,105			4,055,578			4,532,544			4,002,683
Average assets	4,875,473			4,325,500			4,807,226			4,273,288
Average deposits	4,166,487			3,479,365			4,020,971			3,481,176
Average borrowings	136,850			296,858			218,695			248,724
Average interest-bearing liabilities	3,083,461			2,605,737			3,031,587			2,575,246
Average stockholders’ equity	544,283			518,015			539,305			508,742
Average tangible equity	531,522			516,424			526,498			507,111
Per share data:
Earnings per share – basic ⁽²⁾	$	0.45		$	0.44		$	0.88		$	0.90
Earnings per share – diluted ⁽²⁾	$	0.45		$	0.44		$	0.87		$	0.90
Book value per share ⁽³⁾	$	16.98		$	16.28		$	16.98		$	16.28
Tangible book value per share ⁽⁴⁾	$	16.59		$	16.23		$	16.59		$	16.23
Cash dividends per share	$	0.19		$	0.14		$	0.38		$	0.28
Common shares outstanding	32,393,856			32,260,320			32,393,856			32,260,320
Performance ratios:
Return on average assets ^{(5) (6)}	1.19		%	1.32		%	1.18		%	1.36		%
Return on average stockholders’ equity ^{(5) (7)}	10.65		%	10.98		%	10.56		%	11.41		%
Return on average tangible equity ^{(5) (8)}	10.91		%	11.02		%	10.82		%	11.45		%
Net interest margin ⁽⁹⁾	3.81		%	4.02		%	3.85		%	4.00		%
Net interest margin excluding acquisition accounting⁽⁹⁾	3.76		%	3.84		%	3.80		%	3.75		%
Efficiency ratio ⁽¹⁰⁾	54.74		%	56.46		%	54.84		%	56.84		%
Dividend payout ratio ⁽¹¹⁾	42.43		%	31.82		%	53.66		%	31.11		%
Average stockholders’ equity to average assets	11.16		%	11.98		%	11.22		%	11.91		%



Capital ratios⁽¹⁵⁾:
Total risk-based capital:
Hanmi Financial	15.69		%	15.16		%	15.69		%	15.16		%
Hanmi Bank	15.44		%	14.58		%	15.44		%	14.58		%
Tier 1 risk-based capital:
Hanmi Financial	12.58		%	14.00		%	12.58		%	14.00		%
Hanmi Bank	14.62		%	13.43		%	14.62		%	13.43		%
Common equity Tier 1 capital:
Hanmi Financial	12.22		%	13.85		%	12.22		%	13.85		%
Hanmi Bank	14.62		%	13.43		%	14.62		%	13.43		%
Tier 1 leverage:
Hanmi Financial	11.08		%	11.69		%	11.08		%	11.69		%
Hanmi Bank	12.89		%	11.21		%	12.89		%	11.21		%
Asset quality ratios:
Nonperforming Non-PCI loans and leases to loans and leases ⁽¹²⁾	0.41		%	0.36		%	0.41		%	0.36		%
Nonperforming assets to assets ⁽¹³⁾	0.42		%	0.54		%	0.42		%	0.54		%
Net loan and lease charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans and leases	(0.02		)%	(0.02		)%	(0.01		)%	0.01		%
Allowance for loan lease losses to loans and leases	0.83		%	1.15		%	0.83		%	1.15		%
Allowance for loan and lease losses to non-performing loans and leases ⁽¹²⁾ ⁽¹⁴⁾	200.67		%	277.60		%	200.67		%	277.60		%
Acquired loans:
PCI loans, net of discounts	$	8,784		$	15,020		$	8,784		$	15,020
Allowance for loan losses on PCI loans	720			5,448			720			5,448
Non-PCI loans, net of discounts	96,600			117,750			96,600			117,750
Unamortized acquisition discounts on Non-PCI loans	5,322			7,735			5,322			7,735


⁽¹⁾	Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease losses


⁽²⁾	Calculation based on net income allocated to common shares


⁽³⁾	Stockholders’ equity divided by common shares outstanding


⁽⁴⁾	Tangible equity divided by common shares outstanding


⁽⁵⁾	Calculation based on annualized net income


⁽⁶⁾	Net income divided by average assets


⁽⁷⁾	Net income divided by average stockholders’ equity


⁽⁸⁾	Net income divided by average tangible equity


⁽⁹⁾	Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis before provision for loan and lease losses divided by average interest-earning assets


⁽¹⁰⁾	Noninterest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income before provision for loan and lease losses and noninterest income


⁽¹¹⁾	Dividend declared per share divided by basic earnings per share


⁽¹²⁾	Excludes PCI loans


⁽¹³⁾	Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and leases (see footnote (12) above) and OREO


⁽¹⁴⁾	Excludes allowance for loan and lease losses allocated to PCI loans


⁽¹⁵⁾	Basel III rules, including certain transitional provisions, became effective January 1, 2015

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The Company calculates certain supplemental financial information determined by methods other than in accordance with U.S. GAAP, including tangible assets, tangible stockholders' equity, tangible book value per share, core interest income and yield, and net interest income and margin excluding acquisition accounting. These non-GAAP measures are used by management in analyzing Hanmi Financial’s capital strength, core loan and lease interest income and yield, and net interest income and margin without the impact of the CBI acquisition.

Tangible equity is calculated by subtracting goodwill created from acquisition of the Commercial Equipment Leasing Divison and core deposit intangible from stockholders’ equity. Banking and financial institution regulators also exclude goodwill and core deposit intangible from stockholders’ equity when assessing the capital adequacy of a financial institution. Core loan and lease interest income and yield are calculated by subtracting accretion of discount on purchased loans. Net interest income and net interest margin are calculated by adjusting the reported amounts and rates for the impact of the CBI acquisition, including accretion of discount on purchased loans, accretion of time deposit premium and amortization of subordinated debentures discount.

Management believes the presentation of these financial measures excluding the impact of items described in the preceding paragraph provide useful supplemental information that are essential to a proper understanding of the capital strength of Hanmi Financial and our core interest income and margin. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitution for results determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

Tangible Assets, Tangible Stockholders’ Equity and Tangible Book Value Per Share

The following table reconciles these non-GAAP performance measures to the most comparable GAAP performance measures as of the dates indicated:



	June 30,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Total assets	$	4,973,346		$	4,441,333
Less goodwill	(11,031		)	—
Less other intangible assets, net	(1,681		)	(1,537		)
Tangible assets	$	4,960,634		$	4,439,796

Total stockholders’ equity	$	550,140		$	525,185
Less goodwill	(11,031		)	—
Less other intangible assets, net	(1,681		)	(1,537		)
Tangible stockholders' equity	$	537,428		$	523,648

Book value per share	$	16.98		$	16.28
Effect of goodwill	(0.34		)	—
Effect of other intangible assets	(0.01		)	(0.05		)
Tangible book value per share	$	16.59		$	16.23

Core Loan and Lease Yield and Net Interest Margin

The impact of acquisition accounting adjustments on core loan and lease interest income and yield and net interest margin are summarized in the following table:



	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017					June 30, 2016
	Amount			Rate		Amount			Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Core loan and lease interest income and yield	$	47,462		4.82	%	$	39,554		4.78	%
Accretion of discount on purchased loans	509			0.05	%	1,091			0.13	%
As reported	$	47,971		4.87	%	$	40,645		4.91	%

Net interest income and net interest margin excluding acquisition accounting ⁽¹⁾	$	43,129		3.76	%	$	38,671		3.84	%
Accretion of discount on Non-PCI loans and leases	457			0.04	%	994			0.10	%
Accretion of discount on PCI loans and leases	52			—	%	97			0.01	%
Accretion of time deposits premium	116			0.01	%	791			0.08	%
Amortization of subordinated debentures discount	(81		)	(0.01	)%	(62		)	(0.01	)%
Net impact	544			0.05	%	1,820			0.18	%
As reported on a fully taxable equivalent basis	$	43,673		3.81	%	$	40,491		4.02	%


⁽¹⁾	Amounts calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current statutory federal tax rate (rates may not sum due to rounding).



	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017					June 30, 2016
	Amount			Rate		Amount			Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Core loan and lease interest income and yield	$	92,259		4.75	%	$	76,590		4.72	%
Accretion of discount on purchased loans	1,090			0.06	%	3,122			0.20	%
As reported	$	93,349		4.81	%	$	79,712		4.92	%

Net interest income and net interest margin excluding acquisition accounting ⁽¹⁾	$	85,357		3.80	%	$	74,836		3.75	%
Accretion of discount on Non-PCI loans and leases	984			0.04	%	2,748			0.14	%
Accretion of discount on PCI loans and leases	106			—	%	374			0.02	%
Accretion of time deposits premium	242			0.01	%	1,733			0.09	%
Amortization of subordinated debentures discount	(158		)	(0.01	)%	(118		)	—	%
Net impact	1,174			0.05	%	4,737			0.25	%
As reported on a fully taxable equivalent basis	$	86,531		3.85	%	$	79,573		4.00	%


⁽¹⁾	Amounts calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current statutory federal tax rate (rates may not sum due to rounding).

Executive Overview

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, net income was $14.5 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, compared with $14.1 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Net income for the second quarter of 2017 increased 2.2%, or $0.3 million. Income before the provision for income taxes for the second quarter of 2017 increased 2.2%, or $0.5 million principally because of the 8.0%, or $3.2 million, increase in net interest income driven by an increase in loans and leases receivable. The increase in net interest income however was partially offset by the reduction in the negative loan and lease loss provision of $1.9 million and a $1.1 million increase in non-interest expenses.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, net income was $28.2 million, or $0.87 per diluted share, compared with $29.0 million, or $0.90 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Net income for the first six months of 2017 decreased 2.5%, or $0.7 million. Income before the provision for income taxes for the first half of 2017 increased 4.4%, or

$1.9 million, principally because of the 8.9%, or $7.0 million, increase in net interest income driven by an increase in loans and leases receivable. The increase in net interest income however was partially offset by the reduction in the negative loan and lease loss provision of $3.4 million and a $2.2 million increase in non-interest expenses.

Other financial highlights include the following:


•	Loans and leases receivable, before the allowance for loan and lease losses, were $4.07 billion at the end of the second quarter of 2017, up $228.3 million, or 6.0 percent, from $3.84 billion at the end of 2016.


•	Deposits at June 30, 2017 were $4.26 billion, an increase of $449.4 million, or 11.8 percent, from $3.81 billion at the end of 2016.


•	Non-performing assets were at the end of the second quarter of 2017 were $20.8 million, or 0.42 percent of assets , compared with $18.9 million, or 0.40 percent of total assets at the end of 2016.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Our primary source of revenue is net interest income, which is the difference between interest and fees derived from earning assets, and interest paid on liabilities obtained to fund those assets. Our net interest income is affected by changes in the level and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as volume changes. Net interest income is also affected by changes in the yields earned on assets and rates paid on liabilities, referred to as rate changes. Interest rates charged on loans and leases are affected principally by changes to interest rates, the demand for such loans and leases, the supply of money available for lending purposes, and other competitive factors. Those factors are, in turn, affected by general economic conditions and other factors beyond our control, such as federal economic policies, the general supply of money in the economy, legislative tax policies, governmental budgetary matters, and the actions of the Federal Reserve.

The following tables show the average balances of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity; the amount of interest income, on a tax-equivalent basis, and interest expense; the average yield or rate for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the periods indicated. All average balances are daily average balances.



	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017							June 30, 2016
	Average Balance			Interest Income / Expense		Average Yield / Rate		Average Balance			Interest Income / Expense		Average Yield / Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans and leases receivable⁽¹⁾	$	3,951,934		$	47,971	4.87	%	$	3,328,416		$	40,645	4.91	%
Securities ⁽²⁾	585,384			3,444		2.35	%	657,756			3,397		2.07	%
FRB and FHLB stock	16,385			283		6.93	%	30,808			579		7.52	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	47,402			123		1.04	%	38,598			49		0.51	%
Total interest-earning assets	4,601,105			51,821		4.52	%	4,055,578			44,670		4.43	%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks	116,750							114,247
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(33,540		)					(41,483		)
Other assets	191,158							197,158
Total assets	$	4,875,473						$	4,325,500
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand: interest-bearing	$	93,873		$	18	0.08	%	$	96,397		$	19	0.08	%
Money market and savings	1,532,733			3,224		0.84	%	944,355			1,212		0.52	%
Time deposits	1,320,005			3,221		0.98	%	1,268,127			2,453		0.78	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	2,946,611			6,463		0.88	%	2,308,879			3,684		0.65	%
FHLB advances	20,000			49		0.98	%	278,077			299		0.43	%
Subordinated debentures	116,850			1,636		5.59	%	18,781			196		4.20	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	3,083,461			8,148		1.06	%	2,605,737			4,179		0.65	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits: noninterest-bearing	1,219,876							1,170,486
Other liabilities	27,853							31,262
Stockholders’ equity	544,283							518,015
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,875,473						$	4,325,500
Net interest income (taxable equivalent)				$	43,673						$	40,491
Cost of deposits ⁽³⁾						0.62	%						0.43	%
Net interest spread ⁽⁴⁾						3.46	%						3.78	%
Net interest margin ⁽⁵⁾						3.81	%						4.02	%


⁽¹⁾	Loans and leases receivable include LHFS and exclude the allowance for loan and lease losses. Nonaccrual loans and leases are

included in the average loan and lease balance.


⁽²⁾	Amounts calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current statutory federal tax rate.


⁽³⁾	Represents interest expense on deposits as a percentage of all interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits.


⁽⁴⁾	Represents the average yield earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.


⁽⁵⁾	Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

The table below shows changes in interest income (on a tax equivalent basis) and interest expense and the amounts attributable to variations in interest rates and volumes for the periods indicated. The variances attributable to simultaneous volume and rate changes have been allocated to the change due to volume and the change due to rate categories in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount attributable solely to the change in volume and to the change in rate.



	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017 vs. June 30, 2016
	Increases (Decreases) Due to Change In
	Volume			Rate			Total
	(in thousands)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans and leases receivable	$	7,657		$	(331	)	$	7,326
Securities	(391		)	438			47
FRB and FHLB stock	(253		)	(43		)	(296		)
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	13			61			74
Total interest and dividend income	$	7,026		$	125		$	7,151
Interest expense:
Demand: interest-bearing	$	(1	)	$	—		$	(1	)
Money market and savings	1,012			1,000			2,012
Time deposits	106			662			768
FHLB advances	(426		)	176			(250		)
Subordinated debentures	1,354			86			1,440
Total interest expense	$	2,045		$	1,924		$	3,969
Change in net interest income (taxable equivalent)	$	4,981		$	(1,799	)	$	3,182

Interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased $7.2 million, or 16.0 percent, to $51.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $44.7 million for the same period in 2016. Interest expense increased $4.0 million, or 95.0 percent, to $8.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $4.2 million for the same period in 2016. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, was $43.7 million and $40.5 million, respectively. The increase in net interest income was primarily attributable to the 18.7 percent growth in average loans and leases and the change in the mix of interest earning assets with average loans and leases at 86.0 percent of average interest-earning assets for the second quarter of 2017, up from 82.1 percent for the second quarter of 2016, offset by higher rates paid on interest-bearing deposit and increases in other borrowings balances and rates. The net interest spread and net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were 3.46 percent and 3.81 percent, respectively, compared with 3.78 percent and 4.02 percent, respectively, for the same period in 2016. Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting adjustments, net interest margin was 3.76 percent and 3.84 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Average loans and leases increased $623.5 million, or 18.7 percent, to $3.95 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $3.33 billion for the same period in 2016. Average securities decreased $72.4 thousand, or 11.0 percent, to $585.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $657.8 million for the same period in 2016. Average interest-earning assets increased $545.5 million, or 13.5 percent, to $4.60 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $4.06 billion for the same period in 2016. The increase in average loans and leases was due mainly to new loan production and the commencement of the Commercial Equipment Leasing Division in the fourth quarter of 2016. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $477.7 million, or 18.3 percent, to $3.08 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared with $2.61 billion for the same period in 2016. The increase in average interest-bearing liabilities resulted primarily from an increase in money market and savings deposits and the $100 million of subordinated debt issued in the first quarter of 2017. In addition, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $49.4 million, or 4.2 percent, to $1.20 billion for the second quarter of 2017 from $1.17 billion in the same period in 2016.

The average yield on loans and leases decreased to 4.87 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 4.91 percent for the same period in 2016, primarily due to a decrease in discount accretion on purchased loans. The average yield on securities, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased to 2.35 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 2.07 percent for the same period in 2016, attributable primarily to purchasing higher yielding U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on interest-earning assets, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased 9 basis points to 4.52 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 4.43 percent for the same period in 2016, due mainly to the higher percentage of loans in the mix of interest-earning assets. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased by 41 basis points to 1.06 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 0.65 percent for the same period in 2016.



	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017							June 30, 2016
	Average Balance			Interest Income / Expense		Average Yield / Rate		Average Balance			Interest Income / Expense		Average Yield / Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans and leases receivable⁽¹⁾	$	3,917,004		$	93,349	4.81	%	$	3,260,625		$	79,712	4.92	%
Securities ⁽²⁾	556,129			6,468		2.33	%	670,063			6,926		1.03	%
FRB and FHLB stock	16,385			657		8.09	%	30,652			1,121		3.66	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	43,026			200		0.94	%	41,343			97		0.47	%
Total interest-earning assets	4,532,544			100,674		4.48	%	4,002,683			87,856		4.41	%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks	117,273							114,455
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(33,193		)					(42,001		)
Other assets	190,602							198,151
Total assets	$	4,807,226						$	4,273,288
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand: interest-bearing	$	95,727		$	38	0.08	%	$	95,979		$	38	0.08	%
Money market and savings	1,470,165			5,890		0.81	%	923,196			2,295		0.50	%
Time deposits	1,247,000			5,689		0.92	%	1,307,347			5,077		0.78	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	2,812,892			11,617		0.83	%	2,326,522			7,410		0.64	%
FHLB advances	144,558			517		0.72	%	229,973			494		0.43	%
Subordinated debentures	74,137			2,009		5.41	%	18,751			379		4.06	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	3,031,587			14,143		0.94	%	2,575,246			8,283		0.65	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits: noninterest-bearing	1,208,079							1,154,654
Other liabilities	28,255							34,646
Stockholders’ equity	539,305							508,742
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,807,226						$	4,273,288
Net interest income (taxable equivalent)				$	86,531						$	79,573
Cost of deposits ⁽³⁾						0.58	%						0.43	%
Net interest spread ⁽⁴⁾						3.54	%						3.76	%
Net interest margin ⁽⁵⁾						3.85	%						4.00	%


⁽¹⁾	Loans and leases receivable include LHFS and exclude the allowance for loan and lease losses. Nonaccrual loans and leases are included in the average loan and lease balance.


⁽²⁾	Amounts calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the current statutory federal tax rate.


⁽³⁾	Represents interest expense on deposits as a percentage of all interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits.


⁽⁴⁾	Represents the average yield earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.


⁽⁵⁾	Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.



	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017 vs. June 30, 2016
	Increases (Decreases) Due to Change In
	Volume			Rate			Total
	(in thousands)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans and leases receivable	$	17,121		$	(3,484	)	$	13,637
Securities	(1,607		)	1,149			(458		)
FRB and FHLB stock	(695		)	231			(464		)
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	4			99			103
Total interest and dividend income	$	14,823		$	(2,005	)	$	12,818
Interest expense:
Money market and savings	$	1,757		$	1,838		$	3,595
Time deposits	(61		)	673			612
FHLB advances	(110		)	133			23
Subordinated debentures	1,465			165			1,630
Total interest expense	$	3,051		$	2,809		$	5,860
Change in net interest income (taxable equivalent)	$	11,772		$	(4,814	)	$	6,958

Interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased $12.8 million, or 14.6 percent, to $100.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $87.9 million for the same period in 2016. Interest expense increased $5.9 million, or 70.8 percent, to $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $8.3 million for the same period in 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, was $86.5 million and $79.6 million, respectively. The increase in net interest income was primarily attributable to the 20.1 percent growth in average loans and leases and the change in the mix of interest earning assets with average loans and leases at 86.4 percent of average interest-earning assets for the first half of 2017, up from 81.5 percent for the same period in 2016. The net interest spread and net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were 3.54 percent and 3.85 percent, respectively, compared with 3.76 percent and 4.00 percent, respectively, for the same period in 2016. Excluding the effects of acquisition accounting adjustments, net interest margin was 3.80 percent and 3.75 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Average loans and leases increased $656.4 million, or 20.1 percent, to $3.92 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $3.26 billion for the same period in 2016. Average securities decreased $113.9 million, or 17.0 percent, to $556.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $670.1 million for the same period in 2016. Average interest-earning assets increased $530.0 million, or 13.2 percent, to $4.53 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $4.00 billion for the same period in 2016. The increase in average loans and leases was due mainly to new loan production and the commencement of the Commercial Equipment Leasing Division in the fourth quarter of 2016. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $456.3 million, or 17.7 percent, to $3.03 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared with $2.58 billion for the same period in 2016. The increase in average interest-bearing liabilities resulted primarily from an increase in money market and savings deposits and the $100 million of subordinated debt issued in the first quarter of 2017. In addition, average noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $53.4 million, or 4.6 percent, to $1.21 billion for the first six months of 2017 from $1.15 billion in the same period in 2016.

The average yield on loans and leases decreased to 4.81 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from 4.92 percent for the same period in 2016, primarily due to a decrease in discount accretion on purchased loans. The average yield on securities, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased to 2.33 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from 1.03 percent for

the same period in 2016, attributable primarily to purchasing higher yielding U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on interest-earning assets, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased 7 basis points to 4.48 percent for the six months ended June 30,2017 from 4.41 percent for the same period in 2016, due mainly to the higher percentage of loans in the mix of interest-earning assets. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased by 29 basis points to 0.94 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from 0.65 percent for the same period in 2016.

Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

In anticipation of credit risks inherent in our lending business, we set aside an allowance for loan and lease losses through charges to earnings. These charges are made not only for our outstanding loan and lease portfolio, but also for off-balance sheet items, such as commitments to extend credit, or letters of credit. The provisions, whether a charge or a credit, made for our outstanding loan and lease portfolio are recorded to the allowance for loan and lease losses, whereas charges or credits to other noninterest expense for off-balance sheet items are recorded to the allowance for off-balance sheet items, and are presented as a component of other liabilities.

The provision for loan and lease losses was $0.4 million for the second quarter of 2017, which included a negative loan loss provision of $0.2 million related to Purchased Credit Impaired loans from the 2014 acquisition. For the same period in 2016, the provision for loan and lease losses was a negative $1.5 million, which included a negative loan loss provision of $0.06 million related to Purchased Credit Impaired loans. The charge to other noninterest expense for losses on off-balance sheet items was $0.05 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $0.30 million for the same period in 2016.

The provision for loan and lease losses was $0.3 million for the first six months of 2017, which included a negative loan loss provision of $0.2 million related to Purchased Credit Impaired loans from the 2014 acquisition. For the same period in 2016, the provision for loan and lease losses was a negative $3.0 million, which included a loan loss provision of $0.1 million related to Purchased Credit Impaired loans. The charge to other noninterest expense for losses on off-balance sheet items was $0.05 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $0.5 million for the same period in 2016.

See also “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items" for further details.

Noninterest Income

The following table sets forth the various components of noninterest income for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2017		2016		Amount			Percentage
	(dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	2,461	$	2,898	$	(437	)	(15.1	)%
Trade finance and other service charges and fees	1,269		1,064		205			19.3	%
Other operating income	1,826		1,674		152			9.1	%
Subtotal service charges, fees and other income	5,556		5,636		(80		)	(1.4	)%
Gain on sale of SBA loans	2,668		1,774		894			50.4	%
Disposition gains on PCI loans	540		1,963		(1,423		)	(72.5	)%
Net gain on sales of securities	938		—		938			100.0	%
Total noninterest income	$	9,702	$	9,373	$	329		3.5	%

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, noninterest income was $9.7 million, an increase of $0.3 million, or 3.5 percent, compared with $9.4 million for the same period in 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to increased gains on the sale of SBA loans and securities transactions offset by lower gains from the resolution or disposition of PCI loans and service charges on deposit accounts. Sales of securities resulted in a net gain of $938,000 for the second quarter of 2017 compared to no gains for the same period in 2016. When a PCI loan is removed from a loan pool and the cash proceeds or assets received from the settlement of the loan are in excess of its carrying amount, we recognize such gains as disposition gains. Disposition gains on PCI loans were $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2107 compared with $1.9 million the same period in 2016. Gains on SBA loan sales were $2.7 million for the second quarter of 2017, an increase of $0.9 million from the second quarter of 2016 as the volume of loan sales increased to $32.4 million from $20.2 million in the same quarter last year.

The following table sets forth the various components of noninterest income for the periods indicated:



	Six Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2017		2016		Amount			Percentage
	(dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	4,989	$	5,899	$	(910	)	(15.4	)%
Trade finance and other service charges and fees	2,316		2,109		207			9.8	%
Other operating income	3,551		3,072		479			15.6	%
Subtotal service charges, fees and other income	10,856		11,080		(224		)	(2.0	)%
Gain on sale of SBA loans	4,132		2,632		1,500			57.0	%
Disposition gains on PCI loans	723		2,622		(1,899		)	(72.4	)%
Net gain on sales of securities	1,206		—		1,206			100.0	%
Total noninterest income	$	16,917	$	16,334	$	583		3.6	%

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, noninterest income was $16.9 million, an increase of $0.6 million, or 3.6 percent, compared with $16.3 million for the same period in 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to increased gains on the sale of SBA loans and securities transactions offset by lower gains from the resolution or disposition of PCI loans and service charges on deposit accounts. Sales of securities resulted in a net gain of $1.2 million for the first six months of 2017 compared to no gains for the same period in 2016. Disposition gains on PCI loans were $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2107 compared with $2.6 million the same period in 2016. Gains on SBA loan sales were $4.1 million for the first six months of 2017, an increase of $1.5 million from the first six months of 2016 as the volume of loan sales increased to $52.0 million from $32.6 million in the same quarter last year.

Noninterest Expense

The following table sets forth the components of noninterest expense for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2017			2016		Amount			Percentage
	(dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	16,623		$	16,061	$	562		3.5	%
Occupancy and equipment	3,878			3,938		(60		)	-1.5	%
Data processing	1,738			1,454		284			19.5	%
Professional fees	1,554			1,509		45			3.0	%
Supplies and communications	745			709		36			5.1	%
Advertising and promotion	1,015			1,094		(79		)	-7.2	%
OREO expense	519			183		336			183.6	%
Merger and integration costs (income)	(9		)	—		(9		)	-100.0	%
Other operating expenses	2,881			2,915		(34		)	-1.2	%
Total noninterest expense	$	28,944		$	27,863	$	1,081		3.9	%

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, noninterest expense was $28.9 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 3.9 percent, compared with $27.9 million for the same period in 2016. The increase was due primarily to increases in salaries and employee benefits, OREO expense and data processing. The increase in salaries and employee benefits is largely due to the increased headcount due to the commencement of the Commercial Equipment Leasing Division and merit increases compared to the same period in 2016.

The following table sets forth the components of noninterest expense for the periods indicated:



	Six Months Ended June 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2017			2016		Amount			Percentage
	(dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	33,727		$	31,759	$	1,968		6.2	%
Occupancy and equipment	7,861			7,434		427			5.7	%
Data processing	3,369			2,889		480			16.6	%
Professional fees	2,702			2,974		(272		)	-9.1	%
Supplies and communications	1,379			1,445		(66		)	-4.6	%
Advertising and promotion	1,817			1,616		201			12.4	%
OREO expense	418			648		(230		)	-35.5	%
Merger and integration costs (income)	(40		)	—		(40		)	-100.0	%
Other operating expenses	4,948			5,167		(219		)	-4.2	%
Total noninterest expense	$	56,181		$	53,932	$	2,249		4.2	%

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, noninterest expense was $56.2 million, an increase of $2.2 million or 4.2 percent, compared with $53.9 million for the same period in 2016. The increase was due primarily to increases in salaries and employee benefits, data processing and occupancy and equipment expense, offset by lower OREO expenses. The increase in salaries and employee benefits is largely due to the increased headcount due to the commencement of the Commercial Equipment Leasing Division and merit increases compared to the same period in 2016.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $9.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared with $8.9 million for the same period in 2016. The effective income tax rate was 38.5 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Income tax expense was $17.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared with $15.0 million for the same period in 2016. The effective income tax rate was 38.5 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared with 34.2 percent for the same period in 2016. Income tax expense for the first six months of 2016 included a $1.8 million benefit arising from the finalization of the 2014 amended income tax returns. The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2016 would have been 38.2 percent without this benefit.

Financial Condition

Securities

As of June 30, 2017, our securities portfolio was composed primarily of U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, as well as tax exempt municipal bonds. Most of the securities carried fixed interest rates. Other than holdings of U.S. government agency securities, there were no securities of any one issuer exceeding 10 percent of stockholders’ equity as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The following table summarizes the amortized cost, estimated fair value and unrealized gain (loss) on securities as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017							December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Gain (Loss)
	(in thousands)
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities ^{(1) (2)}	$	280,494	$	279,765	$	(729	)	$	230,489	$	229,630	$	(859	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations ⁽¹⁾	92,360		91,438		(922		)	77,447		76,451		(996		)
U.S. government agency securities	7,499		7,457		(42		)	7,499		7,441		(58		)
SBA loan pool securities	4,037		3,895		(142		)	4,356		4,146		(210		)
Municipal bonds-tax exempt	158,614		161,063		2,449			159,789		158,030		(1,759		)
Municipal bonds-taxable	531		537		6			13,391		13,701		310
Corporate bonds	5,006		5,022		16			5,010		5,015		5
U.S. treasury securities	154		154		—			156		156		—
Mutual funds	22,916		22,515		(401		)	22,916		22,394		(522		)
Total securities available for sale	$	571,611	$	571,846	$	235		$	521,053	$	516,964	$	(4,089	)


⁽¹⁾	Collateralized by residential mortgages and guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored entities.


⁽²⁾	Includes securities collateralized by home equity conversion mortgages with total estimated fair value of $9.1 million and $52.9 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

As of June 30, 2017, securities available for sale increased 10.6 percent to $571.8 million, compared with $517.0 million as of December 31, 2016, due mainly to security purchases. As of June 30, 2017, securities available for sale had a net unrealized gain of $235,000, comprised of $3.4 million of unrealized gains and $3.1 million of unrealized losses. As of December 31, 2016, securities available for sale had a net unrealized loss of $4.1 million, comprised of $1.2 million of unrealized gains and $5.3 million of unrealized losses.

The following table summarizes the contractual maturity schedule for securities, at amortized cost, and their weighted-average yields as of June 30, 2017:



					After One Year But				After Five Years But
	Within One Year				Within Five Years				Within Ten Years				After Ten Years				Total
	Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield
									(dollars in thousands)
Securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	9,136	1.93	%	$	33,906	1.75	%	$	95,558	2.20	%	$	141,894	2.34	%	$	280,494	2.21	%
Collateralized mortgage obligations	—		—	%	387		1.47	%	18,814		1.63	%	73,159		1.81	%	92,360		1.77	%
U.S. government agency securities	—		—	%	6,000		1.35	%	1,499		2.20	%	—		—	%	7,499		1.52	%
SBA loan pool securities	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	4,037		1.73	%	4,037		1.73	%
Municipal bonds-tax exempt ⁽¹⁾	—		—	%	5,323		2.64	%	87,342		3.26	%	65,949		4.18	%	158,614		3.62	%
Municipal bonds-taxable	531		3.27	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	531		3.27	%
Corporate bonds	5,006		1.63	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	5,006		1.63	%
U.S. treasury securities	154		1.19	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	154		1.19	%
Mutual funds	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	22,916		2.11	%	22,916		2.11	%
Total securities available for sale	$	14,827	1.87	%	$	45,616	1.80	%	$	203,213	2.60	%	$	307,955	2.58	%	$	571,611	2.51	%


⁽¹⁾	The yield on municipal bonds has been computed on a federal tax-equivalent basis of 35 percent.

Loans and Leases Receivable, Net

The following table shows the loan and lease portfolio composition by type as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(in thousands)
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	916,113		$	859,953
Hospitality	739,067			651,158
Gas station	249,929			262,879
Other ⁽¹⁾	1,104,100			1,109,656
Total commercial real estate loans	3,009,209			2,883,646
Construction	58,159			55,962
Residential property	383,657			338,767
Total real estate loans	3,451,025			3,278,375
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	159,487			138,168
Commercial lines of credit	148,421			136,231
International loans	39,328			25,821
Total commercial and industrial loans	347,236			300,220
Leases receivable	257,525			243,294
Consumer loans⁽²⁾	17,276			22,880
Loans and leases receivable	4,073,062			3,844,769
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(33,758		)	(32,429		)
Loans and leases receivable, net	$	4,039,304		$	3,812,340


⁽¹⁾	The remaining other real estate categories represent less than one percent of total loans and leases, which, among other property types, include mixed-use, apartment, office, industrial, faith-based facilities and warehouse.


⁽²⁾	Consumer loans include home equity lines of credit of $15.1 million and $17.7 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, net loans and leases receivable were $4.04 billion and $3.81 billion, respectively, representing an increase of $227.0 million, or 6.0 percent. The increase in loans and leases as of June 30, 2017 compared with December 31, 2016 was primarily attributable to new loan and lease production of $481.7 million and residential mortgage loan purchases of $73.0 million.

Our loan and lease portfolio included the following concentrations of loans to one type of industry that were greater than 10 percent of loans and leases outstanding:



	Balance at June 30, 2017		Percentage of Loans and Leases Outstanding
	Balance at June 30, 2017		Percentage of Loans and Leases Outstanding
Industry	(in thousands)
Lessor of nonresidential buildings	$	1,257,366	30.9	%
Hospitality	$	746,927	18.3	%

There was no other concentration of loans and leases to any one type of industry exceeding 10.0 percent of loans and leases outstanding.

Nonperforming Loans and Leases and Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming loans and leases (excluding PCI loans) consist of loans and leases on nonaccrual status and loans and leases 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest. Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and leases and OREO. Non-purchased credit impaired (“Non-PCI”) loans and leases are placed on nonaccrual status when, in the opinion of management, the full timely collection of principal or interest is in doubt. Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued when principal or interest payments become more than 90 days past due, unless we believe the loan is adequately collateralized and in the process of collection. However, in certain instances, we may place a particular receivable on nonaccrual status earlier, depending upon the individual circumstances surrounding the receivable's delinquency. When an asset is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued but unpaid interest is reversed against current income. Subsequent collections of cash are applied as principal reductions when received, except when the ultimate collectability of principal is probable, in which case interest payments are credited to income. Nonaccrual assets may be restored to accrual status when principal and interest become current and full repayment is expected. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis for impaired loans and leases not meeting the criteria for nonaccrual. OREO consists of properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means that management intends to offer for sale.

Except for nonperforming loans and leases set forth below and PCI loans, we are not aware of any loans or leases as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 for which known credit problems of the borrower would cause serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with their present repayment terms, or any known events that would result in the receivable being designated as nonperforming at some future date. We cannot, however, predict the extent to which a deterioration in general economic conditions, real estate values, increases in general rates of interest, or changes in the financial condition or business of borrower may adversely affect a borrower’s ability to pay.

The following table provides information with respect to the components of nonperforming assets (excluding PCI loans) as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			Increase (Decrease)
	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			Amount			Percentage
				(dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming Non-PCI loans and leases:
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	210		$	404		$	(194	)	-48.0	%
Hospitality	5,199			5,266			(67		)	-1.3	%
Gas station	945			1,025			(80		)	-7.8	%
Other	1,990			2,033			(43		)	-2.1	%
Total commercial real estate loans	8,344			8,728			(384		)	-4.4	%
Residential property	667			564			103			18.3	%
Commercial and industrial loans	2,699			824			1,875			227.5	%
Leases receivable	3,644			901			2,743			304.4	%
Consumer loans	1,110			389			721			185.3	%
Total nonperforming Non-PCI loans	16,464			11,406			5,058			44.3	%
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing	—			—			—			—
Total nonperforming Non-PCI loans and leases⁽¹⁾	16,464			11,406			5,058			44.3	%
OREO	4,321			7,484			(3,163		)	-42.3	%
Total nonperforming assets	$	20,785		$	18,890		$	1,895		10.0	%

Nonperforming Non-PCI loans and leases as a percentage of Non-PCI loans and leases	0.41		%	0.30		%
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of assets	0.42		%	0.40		%
Troubled debt restructured performing Non-PCI loans and leases	$	8,848		$	11,146


⁽¹⁾	Includes nonperforming TDRs of $7.1 million and $6.9 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Nonaccrual Non-PCI loans and leases were $16.5 million as of June 30, 2017, compared with $11.4 million as of December 31, 2016, representing an increase of $5.1 million, or 44.3 percent, primarily due to lease receivables. There were no Non-PCI loans or leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, $7.0 million of loans and leases were placed on nonaccrual status. These additions to nonaccrual loans and leases were partially offset by $0.3 million of nonaccrual loans and leases restored to accrual status and $1.4 million in principal payoffs and pay downs and $0.2 million in OREO transfers.

Delinquent Non-PCI loans and leases (defined as 30 to 89 days past due and still accruing) were $11.6 million as of June 30, 2017, compared with $7.4 million as of December 31, 2016.

The ratio of nonperforming Non-PCI loans and leases to Non-PCI loans and leases increased to 0.41 percent at June 30, 2017 from 0.30 percent at December 31, 2016. Of the $16.5 million nonperforming Non-PCI loans and leases, approximately $12.2 million were impaired based on the definition contained in ASC 310, Receivables, which resulted in an aggregate impairment reserve of $5.5 million as of June 30, 2017. The allowance for collateral-dependent loans is calculated as the difference between the outstanding loan balance and the value of the collateral as determined by recent appraisals less estimated costs to sell. The allowance for collateral-dependent loans varies from loan to loan based on the collateral coverage of the loan at the time of designation as nonperforming. We continue to monitor the collateral coverage, based on recent appraisals, on these loans on a quarterly basis and adjust the allowance accordingly.

As of June 30, 2017, OREO consisted of 7 properties with a combined carrying value of $4.3 million, as compared with 12 properties with a combined carrying value of $7.5 million as of December 31, 2016.

Impaired Loans and Leases

We evaluate loan and lease impairment in accordance with GAAP. With the exception of PCI loans, loans and leases are considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan and lease agreement, including scheduled interest payments. Impaired loans and leases are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the receivable's effective interest rate or, as an expedient, at the receivable's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, less costs to sell. If the measure of the impaired receivable is less than the recorded investment in the receivable, the deficiency will be charged off against the allowance for loan and lease losses or, alternatively, a specific allocation will be established. Additionally, impaired loans and leases are specifically excluded from the quarterly migration analysis when determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses required for the period.

The following table provides information on impaired loans and lease (excluding PCI loans) as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Recorded Investment		Percentage		Recorded Investment		Percentage
	(dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	1,495	5.7	%	$	1,678	6.4	%
Hospitality	6,057		23.2	%	6,227		23.6	%
Gas station	4,828		18.4	%	4,984		18.9	%
Other	4,502		17.2	%	6,070		23.0	%
Total commercial real estate loans	16,882		64.5	%	18,959		71.9	%
Residential property	2,813		10.7	%	2,798		10.6	%
Commercial and industrial loans:	5,275		20.1	%	4,174		15.9	%
Consumer loans	1,224		4.7	%	419		1.6	%
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	26,194	100.0	%	$	26,350	100.0	%

Total impaired loans and leases decreased $0.2 million, or 0.6 percent, to $26.2 million as of June 30, 2017, as compared with $26.4 million at December 31, 2016. Specific allowances associated with impaired loans and leases were $5.5 million and $4.3 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, interest income that would have been recognized had impaired loans and leases performed in accordance with their original terms totaled $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Of these amounts, actual interest recognized on impaired loans and leases was $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, interest income that would have been recognized had impaired loans and leases performed in accordance with their original terms totaled $1.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Of these amounts, actual interest recognized on impaired loans and leases was $0.8 million and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table provides information on TDRs (excluding PCI loans) as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Nonaccrual TDRs		Accrual TDRs		Total		Nonaccrual TDRs		Accrual TDRs		Total
	(in thousands)
Real estate loans
Commercial property	$	6,141	$	5,228	$	11,369	$	6,195	$	6,870	$	13,065
Residential property	—		1,054		1,054		—		1,072		1,072
Commercial and industrial loans	943		2,452		3,395		708		3,085		3,793
Consumer loans	—		114		114		—		119		119
Total Non-PCI loans and leases	$	7,084	$	8,848	$	15,932	$	6,903	$	11,146	$	18,049

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, no loans were restructured and subsequently classified as TDRs. Temporary payment structure modifications included, but were not limited to, extending the maturity date, reducing the amount of principal and/or interest due monthly, and/or allowing for interest only monthly payments for nine months or less.

As of June 30, 2017, TDRs on accrual status were $8.8 million, all of which were temporary interest rate and payment reductions or extensions of maturity, and a $0.2 million allowance relating to these loans was included in the allowance for loan and lease losses. For the TDRs on accrual status, we determined that, based on the financial capabilities of the borrowers at the time of the loan restructuring and the borrowers’ past performance in the payment of debt service under the previous loan terms, performance and collection under the revised terms is probable. As of June 30, 2017, TDRs on nonaccrual status were $7.1 million, and a $3.5 million allowance relating to these loans was included in the allowance for loan and lease losses.

As of December 31, 2016, TDRs on accrual status were $11.1 million, all of which were temporary interest rate and payment reductions or extensions of maturity, and a $0.7 million allowance relating to these loans was included in the allowance for loan and lease losses. As of December 31, 2016, TDRs on nonaccrual status were $6.9 million, and a $2.6 million allowance relating to these loans was included in the allowance for loan and lease losses.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Allowance for Off-Balance Sheet Items

The Bank charges or credits operating expenses for provisions to the allowance for loan and lease losses and the allowance for off-balance sheet items at least quarterly based upon the allowance need. The allowance is determined through an analysis involving quantitative calculations based on historic loss rates and qualitative adjustments for general reserves and individual impairment calculations for specific allocations. The Bank charges the allowance for actual losses and credits the allowance for recoveries on loans and leases previously charged-off.

The Bank evaluates the allowance methodology at least annually. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2016 through the first half of 2017, the Bank utilized a 24-quarter look-back period with equal weighting to all quarters. For the first six months of 2016, the Bank utilized a 20-quarter look-back period.

To determine general reserve requirements, existing loans and leases are divided into eleven general pools of risk-rated loans, as well as three homogeneous pools. During the first half of 2016, existing loans were divided into fourteen general loan pools of risk-rated loans as well as three homogenous loan pools. For risk-rated loans, migration analysis allocates historical losses by pool and risk grade to determine risk factors for potential loss inherent in the current outstanding portfolio. As three homogeneous pools are bulk graded, the risk grade is not factored into the historical loss analysis. In addition, specific reserves are allocated for loans deemed “impaired.”

When determining the appropriate level for allowance for loan and lease losses, management considers qualitative adjustments for any factors that are likely to cause estimated loan and lease losses associated with the Bank’s current portfolio to differ from historical loss experience, including, but not limited to, national and local economic and business conditions, volume and geographic concentrations, and problem loan trends.

To systematically quantify the credit risk impact of trends and changes within the loan and lease portfolio, a credit risk matrix is utilized. The qualitative factors are considered on a loan pool by loan pool basis subsequent to, and in conjunction with, a loss migration analysis. The credit risk matrix provides various scenarios with positive or negative impact on the portfolio along with corresponding basis points for qualitative adjustments.

The following tables reflect our allocation of allowance for loan and lease losses by category as well as the receivable for each loan type:



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Allowance Amount		Percentage		Non- PCI Loans and Leases		Allowance Amount		Percentage		Non- PCI Loans and Leases
	(dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	4,185	12.7	%	$	914,470	$	4,172	13.3	%	$	857,629
Hospitality	9,003		27.3	%	737,369		9,171		29.2	%	649,540
Gas station	1,312		4.0	%	247,566		1,438		4.6	%	260,187
Other	6,189		18.6	%	1,102,084		7,448		23.7	%	1,107,589
Total commercial real estate loans	20,689		62.6	%	3,001,489		22,229		70.8	%	2,874,945
Construction	1,019		3.1	%	58,159		1,916		6.1	%	55,962
Residential property	1,053		3.2	%	382,692		1,067		3.4	%	337,791
Total real estate loans	22,761		68.9	%	3,442,340		25,212		80.3	%	3,268,698
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	4,344		13.1	%	159,432		3,961		12.6	%	138,032
Commercial lines of credit	2,325		7.0	%	148,421		1,297		4.1	%	136,231
International loans	310		0.9	%	39,328		324		1.0	%	25,821
Total commercial and industrial loans	6,979		21.0	%	347,181		5,582		17.7	%	300,084
Leases receivable	87		0.3	%	257,525		307		1.0	%	243,294
Consumer loans	2,032		6.2	%	17,232		191		0.6	%	22,830
Unallocated	1,179		3.6	%	—		166		0.4	%	—
Total	$	33,038	100.0	%	$	4,064,278	$	31,458	100.0	%	$	3,834,906



	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Allowance Amount		Percentage		PCI Loans		Allowance Amount		Percentage		PCI Loans
	(dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
Commercial property
Retail	$	75	10.4	%	$	1,643	$	122	12.6	%	$	2,324
Hospitality	132		18.3	%	1,698		138		14.2	%	1,618
Gas station	378		52.6	%	2,363		589		60.7	%	2,692
Other	—		—	%	2,016		1		0.1	%	2,067
Total commercial real estate loans	585		81.3	%	7,720		850		87.6	%	8,701
Residential property	73		10.1	%	965		72		7.4	%	976
Total real estate loans	658		91.4	%	8,685		922		95.0	%	9,677
Commercial and industrial loans:
Commercial term	41		5.7	%	55		41		4.2	%	136
Consumer loans	21		2.9	%	44		8		0.8	%	50
Total	$	720	100.0	%	$	8,784	$	971	100.0	%	$	9,863

The following tables set forth certain information regarding allowance for loan and lease losses and allowance for off-balance sheet items for the periods presented. Allowance for off-balance sheet items is determined by applying reserve factors according to pool and grade as well as actual current commitment usage figures by type to existing contingent liabilities.



	As of and for the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2017									December 31, 2016									June 30, 2016
	Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total			Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total			Non-PCI Loans and Leases			PCI Loans			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan and Lease losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	32,261		$	891		$	33,152		$	33,439		$	5,533		$	38,972		$	35,381		$	5,645		$	41,026
Actual charge-offs	(665		)	—			(665		)	(2,326		)	(4,991		)	(7,317		)	(662		)	(137		)	(799		)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off	849			—			849			623			—			623			995			—			995
Net loan recoveries (charge-offs)	184			—			184			(1,703		)	(4,991		)	(6,694		)	333			(137		)	196
Loan and lease loss provision (income)	593			(171		)	422			(278		)	429			151			(1,455		)	(60		)	(1,515		)
Balance at end of period	$	33,038		$	720		$	33,758		$	31,458		$	971		$	32,429		$	34,259		$	5,448		$	39,707

Allowance for off-balance sheet items:
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,184		$	—		$	1,184		$	1,491		$	—		$	1,491		$	1,220		$	—		$	1,220
Provision (income)	(49		)	—			(49		)	(307		)	—			(307		)	255			—			255
Balance at end of period	$	1,135		$	—		$	1,135		$	1,184		$	—		$	1,184		$	1,475		$	—		$	1,475

Ratios:
Net loan and lease charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans and leases⁽¹⁾	(0.02		)%	—		%	(0.02		)%	0.18		%	157.18		%	0.73		%	(0.04		)%	3.14		%	(0.02		)%
Net loan and lease charge-offs (recoveries) to loans and leases⁽¹⁾	(0.02		)%	—		%	(0.02		)%	0.18		%	202.41		%	0.70		%	(0.04		)%	3.65		%	(0.02		)%
Allowance for loan and lease losses to average loans and leases	0.83		%	8.12		%	0.86		%	0.85		%	7.64		%	0.88		%	1.02		%	31.26		%	1.19		%
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans and leases	0.81		%	8.20		%	0.83		%	0.82		%	9.84		%	0.84		%	1.00		%	36.27		%	1.15		%
Net loan and lease charge-offs (recoveries) to allowance for loan and lease losses⁽¹⁾	(2.23		)%	—		%	(2.17		)%	21.65		%	2056.02		%	82.57		%	(3.89		)%	10.06		%	(1.97		)%
Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans and leases	200.67		%	—		%	205.04		%	275.80		%	—		%	284.32		%	277.60		%	—		%	321.75		%
Balance:
Average loans and leases during period	$	3,999,635		$	8,872		$	3,951,934		$	3,686,013		$	12,702		$	3,690,955		$	3,360,467		$	17,428		$	3,328,416
Loans and leases at end of period	$	4,064,278		$	8,784		$	4,073,062		$	3,834,906		$	9,863		$	3,844,769		$	3,434,290		$	15,020		$	3,449,310
Nonperforming loans and leases at end of period	$	16,464		$	—		$	16,464		$	11,406		$	—		$	11,406		$	12,341		$	—		$	12,341


⁽¹⁾	Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) are annualized to calculate the ratios.



	As of and for the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2016
	Non-PCI Loans			PCI Loans			Total			Non-PCI Loans			PCI Loans			Total

Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	31,458		$	971		$	32,429		$	37,494		$	5,441		$	42,935
Actual charge-offs	(851		)	—			(851		)	(1,299		)	(137		)	(1,436		)
Recoveries on loans previously charged off	1,838			—			1,838			1,248			—			1,248
Net loan recoveries (charge-offs)	987			—			987			(51		)	(137		)	(188		)
Loan and lease loss provision (income	593			(251		)	342			(3,184		)	144			(3,040		)
Balance at end of period	$	33,038		$	720		$	33,758		$	34,259		$	5,448		$	39,707

Allowance for off-balance sheet items:
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,184		$	—		$	1,184		$	986		$	—		$	986
Provision (income)	(49		)	—			(49		)	489			—			489
Balance at end of period	$	1,135		$	—		$	1,135		$	1,475		$	—		$	1,475

Ratios:
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans⁽¹⁾	(0.05		)%	—		%	(0.05		)%	—		%	1.56		%	0.01		%
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to loans ⁽¹⁾	(0.05		)%	—		%	(0.05		)%	—		%	1.82		%	0.01		%
Allowance for loan losses to average loans	0.84		%	7.72		%	0.86		%	1.04		%	31.10		%	1.22		%
Allowance for loan losses to loans	0.81		%	8.2		%	0.83		%	1.00		%	36.27		%	1.15		%
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to allowance for loan losses⁽¹⁾	(5.97		)%	—		%	(5.85		)%	0.03		%	5.03		%	0.95		%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans	200.67		%	—		%	205.04		%	277.60		%	—		%	321.75		%
Balance:
Average loans during period	$	3,949,592		$	9,324		$	3,917,004		$	3,298,796		$	17,517		$	3,260,625
Loans at end of period	$	4,046,278		$	8,784		$	4,073,062		$	3,434,290		$	15,020		$	3,449,310
Nonperforming loans at end of period	$	16,464		$	—		$	16,464		$	12,341		$	—		$	12,341


⁽¹⁾	Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) are annualized to calculate the ratios.

Allowance for loan and lease losses was $33.8 million, $32.4 million and $39.7 million, as of June 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and June 30, 2016, respectively. The increase of $1.4 million, or 4.1 percent, in the allowance for loan and lease losses as of June 30, 2017, compared with December 31, 2016 was due primarily to the increase in estimated loss factors and an increase in loans and lease. Accordingly, the non-PCI loan and lease loss allowance increased $1.5 million to $33.0 million as of June 30, 2017, compared with $31.5 million at December 31, 2016. The PCI loan loss allowance decreased $0.3 million to $0.7 million as of June 30, 2017, compared with $1.0 million at December 31, 2016.

The allowance for off-balance sheet exposure, primarily unfunded loan commitments, was $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.5 million as of June 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively. The Bank closely monitors the borrower’s repayment capabilities, while funding existing commitments to ensure losses are minimized.

Based on management’s evaluation and analysis of portfolio credit quality and prevailing economic conditions, we believe these allowances are adequate for losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and for off-balance sheet exposures as of June 30, 2017.

The following table presents a summary of net charge-offs (recoveries):



	As of and for the Three Months Ended							As of and for the Six Months Ended
	Charge-offs		Recoveries		Net Charge-offs (Recoveries)			Charge-offs		Recoveries		Net Charge-offs (Recoveries)
	(in thousands)
June 30, 2017
Real estate loans	$	38	$	447	$	(409	)	$	142	$	1,159	$	(1,017	)
Commercial and industrial loans	—		367		(367		)	40		644		(604		)
Leases receivable	627		20		607			669		20		649
Consumer loans	—		15		(15		)			15		(15		)
Total Non-PCI loans	$	665	$	849	$	(184	)	$	851	$	1,838	$	(987	)

June 30, 2016
Real estate loans	$	156	$	97	59			$	691	$	190	501
Commercial and industrial loans	506		845		(339		)	608		1,005		(397		)
Consumer loans	—		53		(53		)	—		53		(53		)
Total Non-PCI loans	$	662	$	995	$	(333	)	$	1,299	$	1,248	$	51

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, total charge-offs were $0.7 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, total recoveries were $0.8 million, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 14.7 percent, from $1.0 million for the same period in 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, total charge-offs were $0.9 million, a decrease of $0.5 million or 34.5 percent from $1.3 million for the same period in 2016, and total recoveries were $1.8 million, an increase of $0.6 million or 47.3 percent from $1.2 million for the same period in 2016.

Deposits

The following table shows the composition of deposits by type as of the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Balance		Percent		Balance		Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Demand – noninterest-bearing	$	1,260,929	29.6	%	$	1,203,240	31.6	%
Interest-bearing:
Demand	93,390		2.2	%	96,856		2.5	%
Money market and savings	1,528,127		35.9	%	1,329,324		34.9	%
Time deposits of $100,000 or more	1,057,243		24.8	%	844,386		22.2	%
Other time deposits	319,484		7.5	%	335,931		8.8	%
Total deposits	$	4,259,173	100.0	%	$	3,809,737	100.0	%


⁽¹⁾	Includes $460.5 million and $445.4 million of time deposits of $250,000 or more as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Deposits increased $449.4 million, or 11.8 percent, to $4.26 billion as of June 30, 2017 from $3.81 billion as of December 31, 2016. The increase in deposits was mainly attributable to the $198.8 million and $196.4 million increase in money market and savings deposits and time deposits, respectively.

Borrowings

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were $20.0 million and $315.0 million in overnight advances from the FHLB, respectively. The reduction in FHLB advances was supported by the increase in deposits for the first six months of 2017. In addition, subordinated debentures were $117.0 million and $19.0 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The change represents the proceeds from the Subordinated Note that closed on March 21, 2017.

Interest Rate Risk Management

The spread between interest income on interest-earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities is the principal component of net interest income, and interest rate changes substantially affect our financial performance. We emphasize capital protection through stable earnings rather than maximizing yield. In order to achieve stable earnings, we prudently manage our assets and liabilities and closely monitor the percentage changes in net interest income and equity value in relation to limits established within our guidelines.

The Company performs simulation modeling to estimate the potential effects of interest rate changes. The following table summarizes one of the stress simulations performed to forecast the impact of changing interest rates on net interest income and the value of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected on our balance sheet (i.e., an instantaneous parallel shift in the yield curve of the magnitude indicated below). This sensitivity analysis is compared to policy limits, which specify the maximum tolerance level for net interest income exposure over a 1- to 12-month and a 13- to 24-month horizon, given the basis point adjustment in interest rates reflected below.



	Net Interest Income Simulation
	1- to 12-Month Horizon				13- to 24-Month Horizon
Change in Interest Rate	Dollar Change			Percentage Change	Dollar Change			Percentage Change
	(dollars in thousands)
300%	$	532		0.30%	$	6,060		3.37%
200%	$	255		0.14%	$	4,039		2.25%
100%	$	431		0.24%	$	2,893		1.61%
(100)%	$	(12,586	)	(7.00)%	$	(21,317	)	(11.87)%



	Economic Value of Equity (EVE)
Change in Interest Rate	Dollar Change			Percentage Change
	(dollars in thousands)
300%	$	(18,304	)	(3.27)%
200%	$	(11,674	)	(2.09)%
100%	$	866		0.15%
(100)%	$	(45,434	)	(8.11)%

The estimated sensitivity does not necessarily represent our forecast, and the results may not be indicative of actual changes to our net interest income. These estimates are based upon a number of assumptions including the nature and timing of interest rate levels including yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and leases and securities, pricing strategies on loans and leases and deposits, and replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While the assumptions used are based on current economic and local market conditions, there is no assurance as to the predictive nature of these conditions, including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Capital Resources

Historically, our primary source of capital has been the retention of operating earnings. In order to ensure adequate levels of capital, the Board regularly assesses projected sources and uses of capital in conjunction with projected increases in assets and levels of risk. Management considers, among other things, earnings generated from operations, and access to capital from financial markets through the issuance of additional securities, including common stock or notes, to meet our capital needs.

At June 30, 2017, the Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio of 15.44 percent, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 14.62 percent, common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 14.62 percent and Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 12.89 percent, placed the Bank in the “well capitalized” category pursuant to capital rules, which is defined as institutions with total risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 10.00 percent, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 8.00 percent, common equity Tier 1 capital ratios equal to or greater than 6.50 percent and Tier 1 leverage capital ratio equal to or greater than 5.00 percent.

At June 30, 2017, the Company's total risk-based capital ratio was 15.69 percent, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 12.58 percent, common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was 12.22 percent and Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 11.08 percent.

For a discussion of implemented changes to the capital adequacy framework prompted by Basel III and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, see our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Liquidity

Hanmi Financial

Management believes that Hanmi Financial, on a stand-alone basis, has adequate liquid assets to meet its current obligations.

Hanmi Bank

The principal objective of our liquidity management program is to maintain the Bank’s ability to meet the day-to-day cash flow requirements of our customers who either wish to withdraw funds or to draw upon credit facilities to meet their cash needs. Management believes that the Bank, on a stand-alone basis, has adequate liquid assets to meet its current obligations. The Bank’s primary funding source will continue to be deposits originating from its branch platform. The Bank’s wholesale funds historically consisted of FHLB advances and brokered deposits. As of June 30, 2017, the Bank had $145.1 million of brokered deposits.

We monitor the sources and used of funds on a regular basis to maintain an acceptable liquidity position. The Bank’s primary source of borrowings is the FHLB, from which the Bank is eligible to borrow up to 30% of its assets. As of June 30, 2017, the total borrowing capacity available based on pledged collateral and remaining available borrowing capacity were $756.5 million and $736.5 million, respectively, compared to $736.6 million and $421.6 million, respectively as of December 31, 2016.

As a means of augmenting its liquidity, the Bank had an available borrowing source of $9.5 million from the Federal Reserve Discount Window, to which the Bank pledged securities with a carrying value of $9.7 million, and had no borrowings as of June 30, 2017.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For a discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 12 - Off-Balance Sheet Commitments included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) in this Report and “Item 1. Business - Off-Balance Sheet Commitments” in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no material changes to the contractual obligations described in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

FASB ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), replaces existing revenue recognition guidance for contracts to provide goods or services to customers and amends existing guidance related to recognition of gains and losses on the sale of certain nonfinancial assets such as real estate. ASU 2014-09 established a principles-based approach to recognizing revenue that applies to all contracts other than those covered by other authoritative U.S. GAAP guidance. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are also required. ASU 2014-09 was to be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and was to be

applied on either a modified retrospective or full retrospective basis. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which defers the original effective date for all entities by one year. Public business entities should apply the guidance in ASU 2015-14 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.

While the guidance will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP, the ASU is not applicable to financial instruments and, therefore, will not impact a majority of the Company’s revenue, including net interest income. While in scope of the new guidance, the Company does not expect a material change in the timing or measurement of revenues related to deposit account fees. The Company will continue to evaluate the effect that this guidance will have on other revenue streams within its scope, as well as changes in disclosures required by the new guidance. However, we do not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. The FASB additionally clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for the accounting guidance on financial liabilities under the fair value option. While we are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, we do not expect its adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), introduces the most significant change for lessees including the requirement under the new guidance to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all leases not considered short-term leases. By definition, a short-term lease is one in which: (a) the lease term is 12 months or less; and (b) there is not an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. For short-term leases, lessees may elect an accounting policy by class of underlying asset under which right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are not recognized and lease payments are generally recognized as expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis. This change will result in lessees recognizing right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for most leases currently accounted for as operating leases under the legacy lease accounting guidance. Examples of changes in the new guidance affecting both lessees and lessors include: (a) defining initial direct costs to only include those incremental costs that would not have been incurred if the lease had not been entered into, (b) requiring related party leases to be accounted for based on their legally enforceable terms and conditions, (c) eliminating the additional requirements that must be applied today to leases involving real estate and (d) revising the circumstances under which the transfer contract in a sale-leaseback transaction should be accounted for as the sale of an asset by the seller-lessee and the purchase of an asset by the buyer-lessor. In addition, both lessees and lessors are subject to new disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.

As a lessee in several operating lease arrangements that are not considered short-tem, effective January 1, 2019, the Company expects to recognize a lease liability for the present value of future such lease commitments and a right of use asset for the same leases. While the Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance, the adoption will result in an increase in the Company’s assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and it will likely not have a significant impact on our consolidated net income, stockholders’ equity or cash flows.

FASB ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, introduces new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments within its scope. The new guidance introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. It also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. Current expected credit losses (“CECL”) model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost; and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, loan commitments, financial guarantees, and net investments in leases, as well as reinsurance and trade receivables. Upon initial recognition of the exposure, the CECL model requires an entity to estimate the credit losses expected over the life of an exposure (or pool of exposures). The estimate of expected credit losses (ECL) should consider historical information, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including estimates of prepayments. Financial instruments with similar risk characteristics should be grouped together when estimating ECL. ASU 2016-13 is effective for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application of the guidance will be permitted for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently of evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), addresses eight classification issues related to the statement of cash flows: (1) Debt prepayment of debt extinguishment costs; (2) Settlement of zero-coupon bonds: (3) Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (4) Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (5) Proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6) Distributions received from equity method investees; (7) Beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) Separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Entities will also be required to reconcile such total to amounts on the balance sheet and disclose the nature of the restrictions. ASU 2016-18 is effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of Business, provides guidance on evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The new standard clarifies that when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset, or a group of similar assets, the asset acquired would not represent a business. The new ASU introduces this initial required screen, if met, eliminates the need for further assessment. For public business entities with a calendar year end, the standard is effective in 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments can be applied to transactions occurring before the guidance was issued, as long as the applicable financial statements have not been issued. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill impairment by eliminating the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., the current Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under this ASU, the impairment test is simply the comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount (the current Step 1), with the impairment charge being the deficit in fair value but not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The simplified one-step impairment test applies to all reporting units (including those with zero or negative carrying amounts). An entity should apply the amendments in this ASU on a prospective basis. An entity is required to disclose the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle upon transition. That disclosure should be provided in the first annual period and in the interim period within the first annual period when the entity initially adopts the amendments in this standard. Public business entities should adopt the amendments in this ASU for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Topic 310): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, shortens the period of amortization of the premium on certain callable debt securities to the earliest call date. ASU 2017-08 applies to securities that have explicit, non-contingent call features that are callable at fixed prices and on preset dates. Securities purchased at a discount and mortgage-backed securities in which early repayment is based on prepayment of the underlying assets of the security are outside the scope of ASU 2017-08. For public business entities, the standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period, and applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, provides clarity and reduces both diversity in practice, and costs and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. Under ASU 2017-09, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all the following are met: (1) the fair value of the modified award is the same as the fair value of the original award immediately before the original award is modified, (2) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified and (3) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the

original award immediately before the original award is modified. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market risks in Hanmi Bank’s portfolio, see “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Interest Rate Risk Management” and “- Capital Resources” in this Report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2017, Hanmi Financial carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer). The purpose of the disclosure controls and procedures is to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Hanmi Financial’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2017.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the most recent fiscal quarter, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect Hanmi Financial's internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, Hanmi Financial and its subsidiaries are parties to litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans, and other issues related to the business of Hanmi Financial and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, the resolution of any such issues would not have a material adverse impact on the financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity of Hanmi Financial or its subsidiaries.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed under Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits



Exhibit Number	Document
10.1	Employment Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2017, by and among Hanmi Financial Corporation, Hanmi Bank and C. G. Kum (incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.1 to Hanmi Financial's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 3, 2017).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document *
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document *
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document *
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document *

* Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language).

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



			Hanmi Financial Corporation

Date:	August 9, 2017	By:	/s/ C. G. Kum
			C. G. Kum
			President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

		By:	/s/ Romolo C. Santarosa
			Romolo C. Santarosa
			Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)